This was first tagged as 2.15.0, 1½ years ago; plenty of time for
everyone to catch up.
By now, the warning is causing more confusion than that it is helpful,
because passing a `.drv` or `drvPath` has legitimate use cases.
The API docs build is extremely noisy (#11841) and probably not many
people care about it anyway. Also, they get rebuild on *every* ninja
invocation which is generally a waste of time.
Of course, you can still build the docs via `nix build
.#nix-{internal,external}-api-docs`, which is pretty fast.
In these trivial cases the final vector size (or lower bound on the size) is known,
so we can avoid some vector reallocations. This is not very important, but is just
good practice and general hygiene.
This is good practice to avoid pessimisations.
Left comments for the reasoning why ctors should be noexcept.
There are some tricky cases where we intentionally want throwing move ctors/assignments.
But those cases should really be reviewed, since some of those can be replaced
with more idiomatic copy/move-and-swap.
`auto &&` and `T &&` are forwarding references and can be
either lvalue or rvalue references. Moving from universal references
is incorrect and should not be done.
Moving from integral or floating-point values is pointless and just
worsens debug performance.
Naming class member variables the same as constructor arguments is a very
slippery slope because of how member variable names get resolved. Compiler
is not very helpful here and we need static analysis to forbid this kind of
stuff.
The following example illustrates the cause quite well:
```cpp
struct B {
B(int) {}
};
struct A {
A(int b): b([&](){
return b;
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(b), int>);
}()) {
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(b), int>);
}
void member() {
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(b), B>);
}
B b;
};
int main() {
A(1).member();
}
```
From N4861 6.5.1 Unqualified name lookup:
> In all the cases listed in [basic.lookup.unqual], the scopes are searched
> for a declaration in the order listed in each of the respective categories;
> name lookup ends as soon as a declaration is found for the name.
> If no declaration is found, the program is ill-formed.
In the affected code there was a use-after-move for all accesses in the constructor
body, but this UB wasn't triggered.
These types of errors are trivial to catch via clang-tidy's [clang-analyzer-cplusplus.Move].
