This actually simplifies the logic since we no longer have to wait for
enter/leave events, and also improves the UX when e.g. handling a crash
with gdb attached.
See #2659
Frame events group logically connected pointer events. It makes sense to make
the backend responsible for sending frame events, since once the events are
split (ie. once the frame events are stripped) it's not easy to figure out
which events belongs to which frame again.
This is also how Weston handles frame events.
Fixes https://github.com/swaywm/wlroots/issues/1468
As evdev-proto is installed by CI some files have been missed:
../examples/pointer-constraints.c:2:10: fatal error: 'linux/input-event-codes.h' file not found
#include <linux/input-event-codes.h>
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../examples/relative-pointer-unstable-v1.c:5:10: fatal error: 'linux/input-event-codes.h' file not found
#include <linux/input-event-codes.h>
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
handle_x11_event() and x11_handle_input_event() react to different kinds
of events, so it does not make much of a difference if
x11_handle_input_event() signals if it handled an event or not.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
