Fix image layout transitions (#1171)

This commit is contained in:
Tom 2019-05-19 22:56:14 +10:00 committed by Lucas Kent
parent 45e71894af
commit e7a03b0e1e
7 changed files with 109 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ impl<P> SyncCommandBufferBuilder<P> {
// collision. But since the pipeline barrier is going to be submitted before
// the flushed commands, it would be a mistake if `collision_cmd_id` hasn't
// been flushed yet.
if collision_cmd_id >= first_unflushed_cmd_id {
if collision_cmd_id >= first_unflushed_cmd_id || entry.current_layout != start_layout {
unsafe {
// Flush the pending barrier.
self.inner.pipeline_barrier(&self.pending_barrier);
@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ impl<P> SyncCommandBufferBuilder<P> {
let mut actually_exclusive = exclusive;
let mut actual_start_layout = start_layout;
if !self.is_secondary && resource_ty == KeyTy::Image &&
start_layout != ImageLayout::Undefined &&
start_layout != ImageLayout::Preinitialized
@ -633,9 +634,11 @@ impl<P> SyncCommandBufferBuilder<P> {
let img = commands_lock.commands[latest_command_id].image(resource_index);
let initial_layout_requirement = img.initial_layout_requirement();
if initial_layout_requirement != start_layout {
actually_exclusive = true;
actual_start_layout = initial_layout_requirement;
// Checks if the image is initialized and transitions it
// if it isn't
let is_layout_initialized = img.is_layout_initialized();
if initial_layout_requirement != start_layout || !is_layout_initialized {
// Note that we transition from `bottom_of_pipe`, which means that we
// wait for all the previous commands to be entirely finished. This is
@ -648,6 +651,19 @@ impl<P> SyncCommandBufferBuilder<P> {
// suboptimal in some cases, in the general situation it will be ok.
//
unsafe {
let from_layout = if is_layout_initialized {
actually_exclusive = true;
initial_layout_requirement
} else {
if img.preinitialized_layout() {
ImageLayout::Preinitialized
} else {
ImageLayout::Undefined
}
};
if initial_layout_requirement != start_layout {
actual_start_layout = initial_layout_requirement;
}
let b = &mut self.pending_barrier;
b.add_image_memory_barrier(img,
0 .. img.mipmap_levels(),
@ -661,8 +677,9 @@ impl<P> SyncCommandBufferBuilder<P> {
access,
true,
None,
initial_layout_requirement,
from_layout,
start_layout);
img.layout_initialized();
}
}
}

View File

@ -312,18 +312,6 @@ macro_rules! ordered_passes_renderpass {
})*
$(if $atch_name == num {
// If the clear OP is Clear or DontCare, default to the Undefined layout.
if initial_layout == Some(ImageLayout::DepthStencilAttachmentOptimal) ||
initial_layout == Some(ImageLayout::ColorAttachmentOptimal) ||
initial_layout == Some(ImageLayout::TransferDstOptimal)
{
if $crate::framebuffer::LoadOp::$load == $crate::framebuffer::LoadOp::Clear ||
$crate::framebuffer::LoadOp::$load == $crate::framebuffer::LoadOp::DontCare
{
initial_layout = Some(ImageLayout::Undefined);
}
}
$(initial_layout = Some($init_layout);)*
$(final_layout = Some($final_layout);)*
})*

View File

@ -497,6 +497,16 @@ unsafe impl<F, A> ImageAccess for AttachmentImage<F, A>
let prev_val = self.gpu_lock.fetch_sub(1, Ordering::SeqCst);
debug_assert!(prev_val >= 1);
}
#[inline]
unsafe fn layout_initialized(&self) {
self.initialized.store(true, Ordering::SeqCst);
}
#[inline]
fn is_layout_initialized(&self) -> bool {
self.initialized.load(Ordering::SeqCst)
}
}
unsafe impl<F, A> ImageClearValue<F::ClearValue> for Arc<AttachmentImage<F, A>>

View File

@ -82,6 +82,16 @@ impl<W> SwapchainImage<W> {
fn my_image(&self) -> ImageInner {
self.swapchain.raw_image(self.image_offset).unwrap()
}
#[inline]
fn layout_initialized(&self) {
self.swapchain.image_layout_initialized(self.image_offset);
}
#[inline]
fn is_layout_initialized(&self) -> bool {
self.swapchain.is_image_layout_initialized(self.image_offset)
}
}
unsafe impl<W> ImageAccess for SwapchainImage<W> {
@ -121,6 +131,16 @@ unsafe impl<W> ImageAccess for SwapchainImage<W> {
Err(AccessError::SwapchainImageAcquireOnly)
}
#[inline]
unsafe fn layout_initialized(&self) {
self.layout_initialized();
}
#[inline]
fn is_layout_initialized(&self) -> bool{
self.is_layout_initialized()
}
#[inline]
unsafe fn increase_gpu_lock(&self) {
}

View File

@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ pub struct UnsafeImage {
// `vkDestroyImage` is called only if `needs_destruction` is true.
needs_destruction: bool,
preinitialized_layout: bool,
}
impl UnsafeImage {
@ -551,6 +552,7 @@ impl UnsafeImage {
mipmaps: mipmaps,
format_features: format_features,
needs_destruction: true,
preinitialized_layout,
};
Ok((image, mem_reqs))
@ -580,6 +582,7 @@ impl UnsafeImage {
mipmaps: mipmaps,
format_features: output.optimalTilingFeatures,
needs_destruction: false, // TODO: pass as parameter
preinitialized_layout: false, // TODO: Maybe this should be passed in?
}
}
@ -778,6 +781,11 @@ impl UnsafeImage {
pub fn usage_input_attachment(&self) -> bool {
(self.usage & vk::IMAGE_USAGE_INPUT_ATTACHMENT_BIT) != 0
}
#[inline]
pub fn preinitialized_layout(&self) -> bool {
self.preinitialized_layout
}
}
unsafe impl VulkanObject for UnsafeImage {

View File

@ -92,6 +92,27 @@ pub unsafe trait ImageAccess {
self.inner().image.supports_blit_destination()
}
/// When images are created their memory layout is initially `Undefined` or `Preinitialized`.
/// This method allows the image memory barrier creation process to signal when an image
/// has been transitioned out of its initial `Undefined` or `Preinitialized` state. This
/// allows vulkano to avoid creating unnecessary image memory barriers between future
/// uses of the image.
///
/// ## Unsafe
///
/// If a user calls this method outside of the intended context and signals that the layout
/// is no longer `Undefined` or `Preinitialized` when it is still in an `Undefined` or
/// `Preinitialized` state, this may result in the vulkan implementation attempting to use
/// an image in an invalid layout. The same problem must be considered by the implementer
/// of the method.
unsafe fn layout_initialized(&self) {}
fn is_layout_initialized(&self) -> bool {false}
unsafe fn preinitialized_layout(&self) -> bool {
self.inner().image.preinitialized_layout()
}
/// Returns the layout that the image has when it is first used in a primary command buffer.
///
/// The first time you use an image in an `AutoCommandBufferBuilder`, vulkano will suppose that
@ -277,6 +298,16 @@ unsafe impl<T> ImageAccess for T
unsafe fn unlock(&self, transitioned_layout: Option<ImageLayout>) {
(**self).unlock(transitioned_layout)
}
#[inline]
unsafe fn layout_initialized(&self) {
(**self).layout_initialized();
}
#[inline]
fn is_layout_initialized(&self) -> bool {
(**self).is_layout_initialized()
}
}
/// Wraps around an object that implements `ImageAccess` and modifies the initial layout

View File

@ -555,6 +555,24 @@ impl <W> Swapchain<W> {
pub fn clipped(&self) -> bool {
self.clipped
}
// This method is necessary to allow `SwapchainImage`s to signal when they have been
// transitioned out of their initial `undefined` image layout.
//
// See the `ImageAccess::layout_initialized` method documentation for more details.
pub(crate) fn image_layout_initialized(&self, image_offset: usize) {
let image_entry = self.images.get(image_offset);
if let Some(ref image_entry) = image_entry {
image_entry.undefined_layout.store(false, Ordering::SeqCst);
}
}
pub(crate) fn is_image_layout_initialized(&self, image_offset: usize) -> bool {
let image_entry = self.images.get(image_offset);
if let Some(ref image_entry) = image_entry {
!image_entry.undefined_layout.load(Ordering::SeqCst)
} else { false }
}
}
unsafe impl<W> VulkanObject for Swapchain<W> {