bors 9556d7a09a Auto merge of #88337 - eddyb:field-failure-is-not-an-option, r=nagisa ... rustc_target: `TyAndLayout::field` should never error. This refactor (making `TyAndLayout::field` return `TyAndLayout` without any `Result` around it) is based on a simple observation, regarding `TyAndLayout::field`: If `cx.layout_of(ty)` succeeds (for some `cx` and `ty`), then `.field(cx, i)` on the resulting `TyAndLayout` should *always* succeed in computing `cx.layout_of(field_ty)` (where `field_ty` is the type of the `i`th field of `ty`). The reason for this is that no matter which field is chosen, `cx.layout_of(field_ty)` *will have already been computed*, as part of computing `cx.layout_of(ty)`, as we cannot determine the layout of *any* type without considering the layouts of *all* of its fields. And so it should be fine to turn any errors into ICEs, since they likely indicate a `cx` mismatch, or some other edge case that is due to a compiler bug (as opposed to ever being an user-facing error). <hr/> Each commit should probably be reviewed separately, though note that there's some `where` clauses (in `rustc_target::abi::call::*`) that change in most commits. cc `@nagisa` `@oli-obk`		2021-08-29 22:54:26 +00:00
..
src	Auto merge of #88337 - eddyb:field-failure-is-not-an-option, r=nagisa	2021-08-29 22:54:26 +00:00
Cargo.toml	Auto merge of #86700 - lqd:matthews-nll-hrtb-errors, r=nikomatsakis	2021-08-18 15:54:59 +00:00