mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2024-11-22 06:44:35 +00:00
f4966590d8
Retire the `unnamed_fields` feature for now `#![feature(unnamed_fields)]` was implemented in part in #115131 and #115367, however work on that feature has (afaict) stalled and in the mean time there have been some concerns raised (e.g.[^1][^2]) about whether `unnamed_fields` is worthwhile to have in the language, especially in its current desugaring. Because it represents a compiler implementation burden including a new kind of anonymous ADT and additional complication to field selection, and is quite prone to bugs today, I'm choosing to remove the feature. However, since I'm not one to really write a bunch of words, I'm specifically *not* going to de-RFC this feature. This PR essentially *rolls back* the state of this feature to "RFC accepted but not yet implemented"; however if anyone wants to formally unapprove the RFC from the t-lang side, then please be my guest. I'm just not totally willing to summarize the various language-facing reasons for why this feature is or is not worthwhile, since I'm coming from the compiler side mostly. Fixes #117942 Fixes #121161 Fixes #121263 Fixes #121299 Fixes #121722 Fixes #121799 Fixes #126969 Fixes #131041 Tracking: * https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49804 [^1]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Unnamed.20struct.2Funion.20fields [^2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49804#issuecomment-1972619108 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| src | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| messages.ftl | ||
| README.md | ||
For more information about how rustc works, see the rustc dev guide.