rust/compiler/rustc_lint/src/lifetime_syntax.rs

504 lines
17 KiB
Rust

use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxIndexMap;
use rustc_hir::intravisit::{self, Visitor};
use rustc_hir::{self as hir, LifetimeSource};
use rustc_session::{declare_lint, declare_lint_pass};
use rustc_span::Span;
use tracing::instrument;
use crate::{LateContext, LateLintPass, LintContext, lints};
declare_lint! {
/// The `mismatched_lifetime_syntaxes` lint detects when the same
/// lifetime is referred to by different syntaxes between function
/// arguments and return values.
///
/// The three kinds of syntaxes are:
///
/// 1. Named lifetimes. These are references (`&'a str`) or paths
/// (`Person<'a>`) that use a lifetime with a name, such as
/// `'static` or `'a`.
///
/// 2. Elided lifetimes. These are references with no explicit
/// lifetime (`&str`), references using the anonymous lifetime
/// (`&'_ str`), and paths using the anonymous lifetime
/// (`Person<'_>`).
///
/// 3. Hidden lifetimes. These are paths that do not contain any
/// visual indication that it contains a lifetime (`Person`).
///
/// ### Example
///
/// ```rust,compile_fail
/// #![deny(mismatched_lifetime_syntaxes)]
///
/// pub fn mixing_named_with_elided(v: &'static u8) -> &u8 {
/// v
/// }
///
/// struct Person<'a> {
/// name: &'a str,
/// }
///
/// pub fn mixing_hidden_with_elided(v: Person) -> Person<'_> {
/// v
/// }
///
/// struct Foo;
///
/// impl Foo {
/// // Lifetime elision results in the output lifetime becoming
/// // `'static`, which is not what was intended.
/// pub fn get_mut(&'static self, x: &mut u8) -> &mut u8 {
/// unsafe { &mut *(x as *mut _) }
/// }
/// }
/// ```
///
/// {{produces}}
///
/// ### Explanation
///
/// Lifetime elision is useful because it frees you from having to
/// give each lifetime its own name and show the relation of input
/// and output lifetimes for common cases. However, a lifetime
/// that uses inconsistent syntax between related arguments and
/// return values is more confusing.
///
/// In certain `unsafe` code, lifetime elision combined with
/// inconsistent lifetime syntax may result in unsound code.
pub MISMATCHED_LIFETIME_SYNTAXES,
Warn,
"detects when a lifetime uses different syntax between arguments and return values"
}
declare_lint_pass!(LifetimeSyntax => [MISMATCHED_LIFETIME_SYNTAXES]);
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for LifetimeSyntax {
#[instrument(skip_all)]
fn check_fn(
&mut self,
cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
_: hir::intravisit::FnKind<'tcx>,
fd: &'tcx hir::FnDecl<'tcx>,
_: &'tcx hir::Body<'tcx>,
_: rustc_span::Span,
_: rustc_span::def_id::LocalDefId,
) {
let mut input_map = Default::default();
let mut output_map = Default::default();
for input in fd.inputs {
LifetimeInfoCollector::collect(input, &mut input_map);
}
if let hir::FnRetTy::Return(output) = fd.output {
LifetimeInfoCollector::collect(output, &mut output_map);
}
report_mismatches(cx, &input_map, &output_map);
}
}
#[instrument(skip_all)]
fn report_mismatches<'tcx>(
cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
inputs: &LifetimeInfoMap<'tcx>,
outputs: &LifetimeInfoMap<'tcx>,
) {
for (resolved_lifetime, output_info) in outputs {
if let Some(input_info) = inputs.get(resolved_lifetime) {
if !lifetimes_use_matched_syntax(input_info, output_info) {
emit_mismatch_diagnostic(cx, input_info, output_info);
}
}
}
}
fn lifetimes_use_matched_syntax(input_info: &[Info<'_>], output_info: &[Info<'_>]) -> bool {
// Categorize lifetimes into source/syntax buckets.
let mut n_hidden = 0;
let mut n_elided = 0;
let mut n_named = 0;
for info in input_info.iter().chain(output_info) {
use LifetimeSource::*;
use hir::LifetimeSyntax::*;
let syntax_source = (info.lifetime.syntax, info.lifetime.source);
match syntax_source {
// Ignore any other kind of lifetime.
(_, Other) => continue,
// E.g. `&T`.
(Implicit, Reference | OutlivesBound | PreciseCapturing) |
// E.g. `&'_ T`.
(ExplicitAnonymous, Reference | OutlivesBound | PreciseCapturing) |
// E.g. `ContainsLifetime<'_>`.
(ExplicitAnonymous, Path { .. }) => n_elided += 1,
// E.g. `ContainsLifetime`.
(Implicit, Path { .. }) => n_hidden += 1,
// E.g. `&'a T`.
(ExplicitBound, Reference | OutlivesBound | PreciseCapturing) |
// E.g. `ContainsLifetime<'a>`.
(ExplicitBound, Path { .. }) => n_named += 1,
};
}
let syntax_counts = (n_hidden, n_elided, n_named);
tracing::debug!(?syntax_counts);
matches!(syntax_counts, (_, 0, 0) | (0, _, 0) | (0, 0, _))
}
fn emit_mismatch_diagnostic<'tcx>(
cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
input_info: &[Info<'_>],
output_info: &[Info<'_>],
) {
// There can only ever be zero or one bound lifetime
// for a given lifetime resolution.
let mut bound_lifetime = None;
// We offer the following kinds of suggestions (when appropriate
// such that the suggestion wouldn't violate the lint):
//
// 1. Every lifetime becomes named, when there is already a
// user-provided name.
//
// 2. A "mixed" signature, where references become implicit
// and paths become explicitly anonymous.
//
// 3. Every lifetime becomes implicit.
//
// 4. Every lifetime becomes explicitly anonymous.
//
// Number 2 is arguably the most common pattern and the one we
// should push strongest. Number 3 is likely the next most common,
// followed by number 1. Coming in at a distant last would be
// number 4.
//
// Beyond these, there are variants of acceptable signatures that
// we won't suggest because they are very low-value. For example,
// we will never suggest `fn(&T1, &'_ T2) -> &T3` even though that
// would pass the lint.
//
// The following collections are the lifetime instances that we
// suggest changing to a given alternate style.
// 1. Convert all to named.
let mut suggest_change_to_explicit_bound = Vec::new();
// 2. Convert to mixed. We track each kind of change separately.
let mut suggest_change_to_mixed_implicit = Vec::new();
let mut suggest_change_to_mixed_explicit_anonymous = Vec::new();
// 3. Convert all to implicit.
let mut suggest_change_to_implicit = Vec::new();
// 4. Convert all to explicit anonymous.
let mut suggest_change_to_explicit_anonymous = Vec::new();
// Some styles prevent using implicit syntax at all.
let mut allow_suggesting_implicit = true;
// It only makes sense to suggest mixed if we have both sources.
let mut saw_a_reference = false;
let mut saw_a_path = false;
for info in input_info.iter().chain(output_info) {
use LifetimeSource::*;
use hir::LifetimeSyntax::*;
let syntax_source = (info.lifetime.syntax, info.lifetime.source);
if let (_, Other) = syntax_source {
// Ignore any other kind of lifetime.
continue;
}
if let (ExplicitBound, _) = syntax_source {
bound_lifetime = Some(info);
}
match syntax_source {
// E.g. `&T`.
(Implicit, Reference) => {
suggest_change_to_explicit_anonymous.push(info);
suggest_change_to_explicit_bound.push(info);
}
// E.g. `&'_ T`.
(ExplicitAnonymous, Reference) => {
suggest_change_to_implicit.push(info);
suggest_change_to_mixed_implicit.push(info);
suggest_change_to_explicit_bound.push(info);
}
// E.g. `ContainsLifetime`.
(Implicit, Path { .. }) => {
suggest_change_to_mixed_explicit_anonymous.push(info);
suggest_change_to_explicit_anonymous.push(info);
suggest_change_to_explicit_bound.push(info);
}
// E.g. `ContainsLifetime<'_>`.
(ExplicitAnonymous, Path { .. }) => {
suggest_change_to_explicit_bound.push(info);
}
// E.g. `&'a T`.
(ExplicitBound, Reference) => {
suggest_change_to_implicit.push(info);
suggest_change_to_mixed_implicit.push(info);
suggest_change_to_explicit_anonymous.push(info);
}
// E.g. `ContainsLifetime<'a>`.
(ExplicitBound, Path { .. }) => {
suggest_change_to_mixed_explicit_anonymous.push(info);
suggest_change_to_explicit_anonymous.push(info);
}
(Implicit, OutlivesBound | PreciseCapturing) => {
panic!("This syntax / source combination is not possible");
}
// E.g. `+ '_`, `+ use<'_>`.
(ExplicitAnonymous, OutlivesBound | PreciseCapturing) => {
suggest_change_to_explicit_bound.push(info);
}
// E.g. `+ 'a`, `+ use<'a>`.
(ExplicitBound, OutlivesBound | PreciseCapturing) => {
suggest_change_to_mixed_explicit_anonymous.push(info);
suggest_change_to_explicit_anonymous.push(info);
}
(_, Other) => {
panic!("This syntax / source combination has already been skipped");
}
}
if matches!(syntax_source, (_, Path { .. } | OutlivesBound | PreciseCapturing)) {
allow_suggesting_implicit = false;
}
match syntax_source {
(_, Reference) => saw_a_reference = true,
(_, Path { .. }) => saw_a_path = true,
_ => {}
}
}
let make_implicit_suggestions =
|infos: &[&Info<'_>]| infos.iter().map(|i| i.removing_span()).collect::<Vec<_>>();
let inputs = input_info.iter().map(|info| info.reporting_span()).collect();
let outputs = output_info.iter().map(|info| info.reporting_span()).collect();
let explicit_bound_suggestion = bound_lifetime.map(|info| {
build_mismatch_suggestion(info.lifetime_name(), &suggest_change_to_explicit_bound)
});
let is_bound_static = bound_lifetime.is_some_and(|info| info.is_static());
tracing::debug!(?bound_lifetime, ?explicit_bound_suggestion, ?is_bound_static);
let should_suggest_mixed =
// Do we have a mixed case?
(saw_a_reference && saw_a_path) &&
// Is there anything to change?
(!suggest_change_to_mixed_implicit.is_empty() ||
!suggest_change_to_mixed_explicit_anonymous.is_empty()) &&
// If we have `'static`, we don't want to remove it.
!is_bound_static;
let mixed_suggestion = should_suggest_mixed.then(|| {
let implicit_suggestions = make_implicit_suggestions(&suggest_change_to_mixed_implicit);
let explicit_anonymous_suggestions = suggest_change_to_mixed_explicit_anonymous
.iter()
.map(|info| info.suggestion("'_"))
.collect();
lints::MismatchedLifetimeSyntaxesSuggestion::Mixed {
implicit_suggestions,
explicit_anonymous_suggestions,
tool_only: false,
}
});
tracing::debug!(
?suggest_change_to_mixed_implicit,
?suggest_change_to_mixed_explicit_anonymous,
?mixed_suggestion,
);
let should_suggest_implicit =
// Is there anything to change?
!suggest_change_to_implicit.is_empty() &&
// We never want to hide the lifetime in a path (or similar).
allow_suggesting_implicit &&
// If we have `'static`, we don't want to remove it.
!is_bound_static;
let implicit_suggestion = should_suggest_implicit.then(|| {
let suggestions = make_implicit_suggestions(&suggest_change_to_implicit);
lints::MismatchedLifetimeSyntaxesSuggestion::Implicit { suggestions, tool_only: false }
});
tracing::debug!(
?should_suggest_implicit,
?suggest_change_to_implicit,
allow_suggesting_implicit,
?implicit_suggestion,
);
let should_suggest_explicit_anonymous =
// Is there anything to change?
!suggest_change_to_explicit_anonymous.is_empty() &&
// If we have `'static`, we don't want to remove it.
!is_bound_static;
let explicit_anonymous_suggestion = should_suggest_explicit_anonymous
.then(|| build_mismatch_suggestion("'_", &suggest_change_to_explicit_anonymous));
tracing::debug!(
?should_suggest_explicit_anonymous,
?suggest_change_to_explicit_anonymous,
?explicit_anonymous_suggestion,
);
let lifetime_name = bound_lifetime.map(|info| info.lifetime_name()).unwrap_or("'_").to_owned();
// We can produce a number of suggestions which may overwhelm
// the user. Instead, we order the suggestions based on Rust
// idioms. The "best" choice is shown to the user and the
// remaining choices are shown to tools only.
let mut suggestions = Vec::new();
suggestions.extend(explicit_bound_suggestion);
suggestions.extend(mixed_suggestion);
suggestions.extend(implicit_suggestion);
suggestions.extend(explicit_anonymous_suggestion);
cx.emit_span_lint(
MISMATCHED_LIFETIME_SYNTAXES,
Vec::clone(&inputs),
lints::MismatchedLifetimeSyntaxes { lifetime_name, inputs, outputs, suggestions },
);
}
fn build_mismatch_suggestion(
lifetime_name: &str,
infos: &[&Info<'_>],
) -> lints::MismatchedLifetimeSyntaxesSuggestion {
let lifetime_name = lifetime_name.to_owned();
let suggestions = infos.iter().map(|info| info.suggestion(&lifetime_name)).collect();
lints::MismatchedLifetimeSyntaxesSuggestion::Explicit {
lifetime_name,
suggestions,
tool_only: false,
}
}
#[derive(Debug)]
struct Info<'tcx> {
type_span: Span,
referenced_type_span: Option<Span>,
lifetime: &'tcx hir::Lifetime,
}
impl<'tcx> Info<'tcx> {
fn lifetime_name(&self) -> &str {
self.lifetime.ident.as_str()
}
fn is_static(&self) -> bool {
self.lifetime.is_static()
}
/// When reporting a lifetime that is implicit, we expand the span
/// to include the type. Otherwise we end up pointing at nothing,
/// which is a bit confusing.
fn reporting_span(&self) -> Span {
if self.lifetime.is_implicit() { self.type_span } else { self.lifetime.ident.span }
}
/// When removing an explicit lifetime from a reference,
/// we want to remove the whitespace after the lifetime.
///
/// ```rust
/// fn x(a: &'_ u8) {}
/// ```
///
/// Should become:
///
/// ```rust
/// fn x(a: &u8) {}
/// ```
// FIXME: Ideally, we'd also remove the lifetime declaration.
fn removing_span(&self) -> Span {
let mut span = self.suggestion("'dummy").0;
if let Some(referenced_type_span) = self.referenced_type_span {
span = span.until(referenced_type_span);
}
span
}
fn suggestion(&self, lifetime_name: &str) -> (Span, String) {
self.lifetime.suggestion(lifetime_name)
}
}
type LifetimeInfoMap<'tcx> = FxIndexMap<&'tcx hir::LifetimeKind, Vec<Info<'tcx>>>;
struct LifetimeInfoCollector<'a, 'tcx> {
type_span: Span,
referenced_type_span: Option<Span>,
map: &'a mut LifetimeInfoMap<'tcx>,
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> LifetimeInfoCollector<'a, 'tcx> {
fn collect(ty: &'tcx hir::Ty<'tcx>, map: &'a mut LifetimeInfoMap<'tcx>) {
let mut this = Self { type_span: ty.span, referenced_type_span: None, map };
intravisit::walk_unambig_ty(&mut this, ty);
}
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for LifetimeInfoCollector<'a, 'tcx> {
#[instrument(skip(self))]
fn visit_lifetime(&mut self, lifetime: &'tcx hir::Lifetime) {
let type_span = self.type_span;
let referenced_type_span = self.referenced_type_span;
let info = Info { type_span, referenced_type_span, lifetime };
self.map.entry(&lifetime.kind).or_default().push(info);
}
#[instrument(skip(self))]
fn visit_ty(&mut self, ty: &'tcx hir::Ty<'tcx, hir::AmbigArg>) -> Self::Result {
let old_type_span = self.type_span;
let old_referenced_type_span = self.referenced_type_span;
self.type_span = ty.span;
if let hir::TyKind::Ref(_, ty) = ty.kind {
self.referenced_type_span = Some(ty.ty.span);
}
intravisit::walk_ty(self, ty);
self.type_span = old_type_span;
self.referenced_type_span = old_referenced_type_span;
}
}