mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2024-12-04 04:39:16 +00:00
8824d13161
interpret: remove support for unsized_locals I added support for unsized_locals in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59780 but the current implementation is a crude hack and IMO definitely not the right way to have unsized locals in MIR. It also [causes problems](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/146212-t-compiler.2Fconst-eval/topic/Missing.20Layout.20Check.20in.20.60interpret.2Foperand.2Ers.60.3F). and what codegen does is unsound and has been for years since clearly nobody cares (so I hope nobody actually relies on that implementation and I'll be happy if Miri ensures they do not). I think if we want to have unsized locals in Miri/MIR we should add them properly, either by having a `StorageLive` that takes metadata or by having an `alloca` that returns a pointer (making the ptr indirection explicit) or something like that. So, this PR removes the `LocalValue::Unallocated` hack. It adds `Immediate::Uninit`, for several reasons: - This lets us still do fairly little work in `push_stack_frame`, in particular we do not actually have to create any allocations. - If/when I remove `ScalarMaybeUninit`, we will need something like this to have an "optimized" representation of uninitialized locals. Without this we'd have to put uninitialized integers into the heap! - const-prop needs some way to indicate "I don't know the value of this local'; it used to use `LocalValue::Unallocated` for that, now it can use `Immediate::Uninit`. There is still a fundamental difference between `LocalValue::Unallocated` and `Immediate::Uninit`: the latter is considered a regular local that you can read from and write to, it just has a more optimized representation when compared with an actual `Allocation` that is fully uninit. In contrast, `LocalValue::Unallocated` had this really odd behavior where you would write to it but not read from it. (This is in fact what caused the problems mentioned above.) While at it I also did two drive-by cleanups/improvements: - In `pop_stack_frame`, do the return value copying and local deallocation while the frame is still on the stack. This leads to better error locations being reported. The old errors were [sometimes rather confusing](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/269128-miri/topic/Cron.20Job.20Failure.202022-06-24/near/287445522). - Deduplicate `copy_op` and `copy_op_transmute`. r? `@oli-obk` |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
src | ||
Cargo.toml |