rust/tests/ui/redundant_field_names.rs
2019-01-13 18:48:54 +01:00

72 lines
1.3 KiB
Rust

// run-rustfix
#![warn(clippy::redundant_field_names)]
#![allow(clippy::no_effect, dead_code, unused_variables)]
#[macro_use]
extern crate derive_new;
use std::ops::{Range, RangeFrom, RangeInclusive, RangeTo, RangeToInclusive};
mod foo {
pub const BAR: u8 = 0;
}
struct Person {
gender: u8,
age: u8,
name: u8,
buzz: u64,
foo: u8,
}
#[derive(new)]
pub struct S {
v: String,
}
fn main() {
let gender: u8 = 42;
let age = 0;
let fizz: u64 = 0;
let name: u8 = 0;
let me = Person {
gender: gender,
age: age,
name, //should be ok
buzz: fizz, //should be ok
foo: foo::BAR, //should be ok
};
// Range expressions
let (start, end) = (0, 0);
let _ = start..;
let _ = ..end;
let _ = start..end;
let _ = ..=end;
let _ = start..=end;
// Issue #2799
let _: Vec<_> = (start..end).collect();
// hand-written Range family structs are linted
let _ = RangeFrom { start: start };
let _ = RangeTo { end: end };
let _ = Range { start: start, end: end };
let _ = RangeInclusive::new(start, end);
let _ = RangeToInclusive { end: end };
}
fn issue_3476() {
fn foo<T>() {}
struct S {
foo: fn(),
}
S { foo: foo::<i32> };
}