mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2025-05-14 02:49:40 +00:00
51a0058d4c
3998: Make add_function generate functions in other modules via qualified path r=matklad a=TimoFreiberg Additional feature for #3639 - [x] Add tests for paths with more segments - [x] Make generating the function in another file work - [x] Add `pub` or `pub(crate)` to the generated function if it's generated in a different module - [x] Make the assist jump to the edited file - [x] Enable file support in the `check_assist` helper 4006: Syntax highlighting for format strings r=matklad a=ltentrup I have an implementation for syntax highlighting for format string modifiers `{}`. The first commit refactors the changes in #3826 into a separate struct. The second commit implements the highlighting: first we check in a macro call whether the macro is a format macro from `std`. In this case, we remember the format string node. If we encounter this node during syntax highlighting, we check for the format modifiers `{}` using regular expressions. There are a few places which I am not quite sure: - Is the way I extract the macro names correct? - Is the `HighlightTag::Attribute` suitable for highlighting the `{}`? Let me know what you think, any feedback is welcome! Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <leander.tentrup@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <ltentrup@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| ast | ||
| parsing | ||
| validation | ||
| algo.rs | ||
| ast.rs | ||
| fuzz.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| parsing.rs | ||
| ptr.rs | ||
| syntax_error.rs | ||
| syntax_node.rs | ||
| tests.rs | ||
| validation.rs | ||