rust/compiler/rustc_incremental/Cargo.toml
Matthias Krüger 1066af5b1a
Rollup merge of #137410 - saethlin:stable-dep-tracking-hash, r=workingjubilee
Use StableHasher + Hash64 for dep_tracking_hash

This is similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137095. We currently have a +/- 1 byte jitter in the size of dep graphs reported on perf.rust-lang.org. I think this fixes that jitter.

When I introduced `Hash64`, I wired it through most of the compiler by making it an output of `StableHasher::finalize` then fixing the compile errors. I missed this case because the `u64` hash in this function is being produced by `DefaultHasher` instead. That seems pretty sketchy because the code seems confident that the hash needs to be stable, and we have a mechanism for stable hashing that we weren't using here.
2025-02-22 11:36:46 +01:00

25 lines
789 B
TOML

[package]
name = "rustc_incremental"
version = "0.0.0"
edition = "2024"
[dependencies]
# tidy-alphabetical-start
rand = "0.8.4"
rustc_ast = { path = "../rustc_ast" }
rustc_data_structures = { path = "../rustc_data_structures" }
rustc_errors = { path = "../rustc_errors" }
rustc_fluent_macro = { path = "../rustc_fluent_macro" }
rustc_fs_util = { path = "../rustc_fs_util" }
rustc_graphviz = { path = "../rustc_graphviz" }
rustc_hashes = { path = "../rustc_hashes" }
rustc_hir = { path = "../rustc_hir" }
rustc_macros = { path = "../rustc_macros" }
rustc_middle = { path = "../rustc_middle" }
rustc_serialize = { path = "../rustc_serialize" }
rustc_session = { path = "../rustc_session" }
rustc_span = { path = "../rustc_span" }
thin-vec = "0.2.12"
tracing = "0.1"
# tidy-alphabetical-end