nordic-dev.net/rust
nordic-dev.net/rust
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git synced 2024-11-27 01:04:03 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
a330e49593
rust/compiler/rustc_target
History
Matthias Krüger 713c852a2f
Rollup merge of #117671 - kjetilkjeka:nvptx_c_abi_avoid_direct, r=davidtwco 
NVPTX: Avoid PassMode::Direct for args in C abi

Fixes #117480

I must admit that I'm confused about `PassMode` altogether, is there a good sum-up threads for this anywhere? I'm especially confused about how "indirect" and "byval" goes together. To me it seems like "indirect" basically means "use a indirection through a pointer", while "byval" basically means "do not use indirection through a pointer".

The return used to keep `PassMode::Direct` for small aggregates. It turns out that `make_indirect` messes up the tests and one way to fix it is to keep `PassMode::Direct` for all aggregates. I have mostly seen this PassMode mentioned for args. Is it also a problem for returns? When experimenting with `byval` as an alternative i ran into [this assert](61a3eea804/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/abi.rs (L463C22-L463C22))

I have added tests for the same kind of types that is already tested for the "ptx-kernel" abi. The tests cannot be enabled until something like #117458 is completed and merged.

CC: ``@RalfJung`` since you seem to be the expert on this and have already helped me out tremendously

CC: ``@RDambrosio016`` in case this influence your work on `rustc_codegen_nvvm`

``@rustbot`` label +O-NVPTX
2024-05-28 18:04:31 +02:00
..
src Rollup merge of #117671 - kjetilkjeka:nvptx_c_abi_avoid_direct, r=davidtwco 2024-05-28 18:04:31 +02:00
Cargo.toml Update to bitflags 2 in the compiler 2023-12-30 18:17:28 +01:00
README.md Fix outdated crate names in compiler docs 2021-04-08 11:12:14 -05:00

README.md

rustc_target contains some very low-level details that are specific to different compilation targets and so forth.

For more information about how rustc works, see the rustc dev guide.