mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2025-05-04 14:07:36 +00:00
54dc7cebce
The addition of `cfg(wasm)` was an oversight on my end that has a number of downsides: * It was introduced as an insta-stable addition, forgoing the usual staging mechanism we use for potentially far-reaching changes; * It is a breaking change for people who are using `--cfg wasm` either directly or via cargo for other purposes; * It is not entirely clear if a bare `wasm` cfg is a right option or whether `wasm` family of targets are special enough to warrant special-casing these targets specifically. As for the last point, there appears to be a fair amount of support for reducing the boilerplate in specifying architectures from the same family, while ignoring their pointer width. The suggested way forward would be to propose such a change as a separate RFC as it is potentially a quite contentious addition. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| cgu_reuse_tracker.rs | ||
| code_stats.rs | ||
| config.rs | ||
| filesearch.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| options.rs | ||
| output.rs | ||
| parse.rs | ||
| search_paths.rs | ||
| session.rs | ||
| utils.rs | ||