rust/tests/ui/target-feature/feature-hierarchy.rs
Ralf Jung a0215d8e46 Re-do recursive const stability checks
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features

This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.

Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed.
There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR
building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable
functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be
`rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be
sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special
case so IMO it's fine.

The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be
constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be
const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability
requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked),
it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever
becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or
`#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply
const-stability.

Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to
use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]`
functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding
`#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to
be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is
used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]`
functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No
other attributes are required.
2024-10-25 20:31:40 +02:00

60 lines
1.5 KiB
Rust

//@ revisions: aarch64-neon aarch64-sve2
//@ [aarch64-neon] compile-flags: -Ctarget-feature=+neon --target=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
//@ [aarch64-neon] needs-llvm-components: aarch64
//@ [aarch64-sve2] compile-flags: -Ctarget-feature=-neon,+sve2 --target=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
//@ [aarch64-sve2] needs-llvm-components: aarch64
//@ build-pass
#![no_core]
#![crate_type = "rlib"]
#![feature(intrinsics, rustc_attrs, no_core, lang_items, staged_api)]
#![stable(feature = "test", since = "1.0.0")]
// Tests vetting "feature hierarchies" in the cases where we impose them.
// Supporting minimal rust core code
#[lang = "sized"]
trait Sized {}
#[lang = "copy"]
trait Copy {}
impl Copy for bool {}
extern "rust-intrinsic" {
#[stable(feature = "test", since = "1.0.0")]
#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "test", since = "1.0.0")]
fn unreachable() -> !;
}
#[rustc_builtin_macro]
macro_rules! cfg {
($($cfg:tt)*) => {};
}
// Test code
const fn do_or_die(cond: bool) {
if cond {
} else {
unsafe { unreachable() }
}
}
macro_rules! assert {
($x:expr $(,)?) => {
const _: () = do_or_die($x);
};
}
#[cfg(aarch64_neon)]
fn check_neon_not_sve2() {
// This checks that a normal aarch64 target doesn't suddenly jump up the feature hierarchy.
assert!(cfg!(target_feature = "neon"));
assert!(cfg!(not(target_feature = "sve2")));
}
#[cfg(aarch64_sve2)]
fn check_sve2_includes_neon() {
// This checks that aarch64's sve2 includes neon
assert!(cfg!(target_feature = "neon"));
assert!(cfg!(target_feature = "sve2"));
}