rust/compiler/rustc_target
bors 9f85cd6f2a Auto merge of #87794 - bonega:enum_niche_prefer_zero, r=nagisa
Enum should prefer discriminant zero for niche

Given an enum with unassigned zero-discriminant, rust should prefer it for niche selection.
Zero as discriminant for `Option<Enum>` makes it possible for LLVM to optimize resulting asm.

- Eliminate branch when expected value coincides.
- Use smaller instruction `test eax, eax` instead of `cmp eax, ?`
- Possible interaction with zeroed memory?

Example:
```rust

pub enum Size {
    One = 1,
    Two = 2,
    Three = 3,
}

pub fn handle(x: Option<Size>) -> u8 {
    match x {
        None => {0}
        Some(size) => {size as u8}
    }
}
```
In this case discriminant zero is available as a niche.

Above example on nightly:
```asm
 mov     eax, edi
 cmp     al, 4
 jne     .LBB0_2
 xor     eax, eax
.LBB0_2:
 ret
```

PR:
```asm
 mov     eax, edi
 ret
```

I created this PR because I had a performance regression when I tried to use an enum to represent legal grapheme byte-length for utf8.

Using an enum instead of `NonZeroU8` [here](d683304f5d/src/internal/decoder_incomplete.rs (L90))
resulted in a performance regression of about 5%.
I consider this to be a somewhat realistic benchmark.

Thanks to `@ogoffart` for pointing me in the right direction!

Edit: Updated description
2021-09-13 22:14:57 +00:00
..
src Auto merge of #87794 - bonega:enum_niche_prefer_zero, r=nagisa 2021-09-13 22:14:57 +00:00
Cargo.toml rfc3052: Remove authors field from Cargo manifests 2021-07-29 14:56:05 -07:00
README.md Fix outdated crate names in compiler docs 2021-04-08 11:12:14 -05:00

rustc_target contains some very low-level details that are specific to different compilation targets and so forth.

For more information about how rustc works, see the rustc dev guide.