JP Posma 80340f62fe Docs: make Vec::from_raw_parts documentation less strict ... This is my first PR; be gentle! In https://users.rust-lang.org/t/why-does-vec-from-raw-parts-require-same-size-and-not-same-size-capacity/73036/2?u=janpaul123 it was suggested to me that I should make a PR to make the documentation of `Vec::from_raw_parts` less strict, since we don't require `T` to have the same size, just `size_of::<T>() * capacity` to be the same, since that is what results in `Layout::size` being the same in `dealloc`, which is really what matters. Also in https://users.rust-lang.org/t/why-does-vec-from-raw-parts-require-same-size-and-not-same-size-capacity/73036/8?u=janpaul123 it was suggested that it's better to use `slice::from_raw_parts`, which I think is useful advise that could also be mentioned in the docs, so I added that too. Let me know what you think! :)		2022-03-16 09:34:12 -07:00
..
benches	update vec::retain benchmarks	2021-12-04 16:20:35 +01:00
src	Docs: make Vec::from_raw_parts documentation less strict	2022-03-16 09:34:12 -07:00
tests	Rollup merge of #93950 - T-O-R-U-S:use-modern-formatting-for-format!-macros, r=Mark-Simulacrum	2022-03-10 23:12:57 +01:00
Cargo.toml	Switch all libraries to the 2021 edition	2021-12-23 19:03:47 +08:00