Aaron Hill ac384ac2db Fix inconsistencies in handling of inert attributes on statements ... When the 'early' and 'late' visitors visit an attribute target, they activate any lint attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`) that apply to it. This can affect warnings emitted on sibiling attributes. For example, the following code does not produce an `unused_attributes` for `#[inline]`, since the sibiling `#[allow(unused_attributes)]` suppressed the warning. ```rust trait Foo { #[allow(unused_attributes)] #[inline] fn first(); #[inline] #[allow(unused_attributes)] fn second(); } ``` However, we do not do this for statements - instead, the lint attributes only become active when we visit the struct nested inside `StmtKind` (e.g. `Item`). Currently, this is difficult to observe due to another issue - the `HasAttrs` impl for `StmtKind` ignores attributes for `StmtKind::Item`. As a result, the `unused_doc_comments` lint will never see attributes on item statements. This commit makes two interrelated fixes to the handling of inert (non-proc-macro) attributes on statements: * The `HasAttr` impl for `StmtKind` now returns attributes for `StmtKind::Item`, treating it just like every other `StmtKind` variant. The only place relying on the old behavior was macro which has been updated to explicitly ignore attributes on item statements. This allows the `unused_doc_comments` lint to fire for item statements. * The `early` and `late` lint visitors now activate lint attributes when invoking the callback for `Stmt`. This ensures that a lint attribute (e.g. `#[allow(unused_doc_comments)]`) can be applied to sibiling attributes on an item statement. For now, the `unused_doc_comments` lint is explicitly disabled on item statements, which preserves the current behavior. The exact locatiosn where this lint should fire are being discussed in PR #78306		2020-10-24 11:55:48 -04:00
..
src	Fix inconsistencies in handling of inert attributes on statements	2020-10-24 11:55:48 -04:00
Cargo.toml	mv compiler to compiler/	2020-08-30 18:45:07 +03:00