rust/tests/mir-opt/gvn.fn_pointers.GVN.panic-unwind.diff
bors 79611d90b6 Auto merge of #122551 - RayMuir:copy_fmt, r=saethlin
Added "copy" to Debug fmt for copy operands

In MIR's debug mode (--emit mir) the printing for Operands is slightly inconsistent.

The RValues - values on the right side of an Assign - are usually printed with their Operand when they are Places.

Example:
_2 = move _3

But for arguments, the operand is omitted.

_2 = _1

I propose a change be made, to display the place with the operand.

_2 = copy _1

Move and copy have different semantics, meaning this difference is important and helpful to the user. It also adds consistency to the pretty printing.

-- EDIT --

 Consider this example Rust program and its MIR output with the **updated pretty printer.**

This was generated with the arguments --emit mir --crate-type lib -Zmir-opt-level=0 (Otherwise, it's optimised away since it's a junk program).

```rust
fn main(foo: i32) {
    let v = 10;

    if v == 20 {
        foo;
    }
    else {
        v;
    }
}
```

```MIR
// WARNING: This output format is intended for human consumers only
// and is subject to change without notice. Knock yourself out.
fn main(_1: i32) -> () {
    debug foo => _1;
    let mut _0: ();
    let _2: i32;
    let mut _3: bool;
    let mut _4: i32;
    let _5: i32;
    let _6: i32;
    scope 1 {
        debug v => _2;
    }

    bb0: {
        StorageLive(_2);
        _2 = const 10_i32;
        StorageLive(_3);
        StorageLive(_4);
        _4 = copy _2;
        _3 = Eq(move _4, const 20_i32);
        switchInt(move _3) -> [0: bb2, otherwise: bb1];
    }

    bb1: {
        StorageDead(_4);
        StorageLive(_5);
        _5 = copy _1;
        StorageDead(_5);
        _0 = const ();
        goto -> bb3;
    }

    bb2: {
        StorageDead(_4);
        StorageLive(_6);
        _6 = copy _2;
        StorageDead(_6);
        _0 = const ();
        goto -> bb3;
    }

    bb3: {
        StorageDead(_3);
        StorageDead(_2);
        return;
    }
}
```

In this example program, we can see that when we move a place, it is preceded by "move". e.g. ``` _3 = Eq(move _4, const 20_i32);```. However, when we copy a place such as ```_5 = _1;```, it is not preceded by the operand in the original printout. I propose to change the print to include the copy ```_5 = copy _1``` as in this example.

Regarding the arguments part. When I originally submitted this PR, I was under the impression this only affected the print for arguments to a function, but actually, it affects anything that uses a copy. This is preferable anyway with regard to consistency. The PR is about making ```copy``` explicit.
2024-08-19 23:10:46 +00:00

119 lines
3.6 KiB
Diff

- // MIR for `fn_pointers` before GVN
+ // MIR for `fn_pointers` after GVN
fn fn_pointers() -> () {
let mut _0: ();
let _1: fn(u8) -> u8;
let _2: ();
let mut _3: fn(u8) -> u8;
let _5: ();
let mut _6: fn(u8) -> u8;
let mut _9: {closure@$DIR/gvn.rs:614:19: 614:21};
let _10: ();
let mut _11: fn();
let mut _13: {closure@$DIR/gvn.rs:614:19: 614:21};
let _14: ();
let mut _15: fn();
scope 1 {
debug f => _1;
let _4: fn(u8) -> u8;
scope 2 {
debug g => _4;
let _7: {closure@$DIR/gvn.rs:614:19: 614:21};
scope 3 {
debug closure => _7;
let _8: fn();
scope 4 {
debug cf => _8;
let _12: fn();
scope 5 {
debug cg => _12;
}
}
}
}
}
bb0: {
- StorageLive(_1);
+ nop;
_1 = identity::<u8> as fn(u8) -> u8 (PointerCoercion(ReifyFnPointer));
StorageLive(_2);
StorageLive(_3);
_3 = copy _1;
- _2 = opaque::<fn(u8) -> u8>(move _3) -> [return: bb1, unwind continue];
+ _2 = opaque::<fn(u8) -> u8>(copy _1) -> [return: bb1, unwind continue];
}
bb1: {
StorageDead(_3);
StorageDead(_2);
- StorageLive(_4);
+ nop;
_4 = identity::<u8> as fn(u8) -> u8 (PointerCoercion(ReifyFnPointer));
StorageLive(_5);
StorageLive(_6);
_6 = copy _4;
- _5 = opaque::<fn(u8) -> u8>(move _6) -> [return: bb2, unwind continue];
+ _5 = opaque::<fn(u8) -> u8>(copy _4) -> [return: bb2, unwind continue];
}
bb2: {
StorageDead(_6);
StorageDead(_5);
- StorageLive(_7);
- _7 = {closure@$DIR/gvn.rs:614:19: 614:21};
- StorageLive(_8);
+ nop;
+ _7 = const ZeroSized: {closure@$DIR/gvn.rs:614:19: 614:21};
+ nop;
StorageLive(_9);
- _9 = copy _7;
- _8 = move _9 as fn() (PointerCoercion(ClosureFnPointer(Safe)));
+ _9 = const ZeroSized: {closure@$DIR/gvn.rs:614:19: 614:21};
+ _8 = const ZeroSized: {closure@$DIR/gvn.rs:614:19: 614:21} as fn() (PointerCoercion(ClosureFnPointer(Safe)));
StorageDead(_9);
StorageLive(_10);
StorageLive(_11);
_11 = copy _8;
- _10 = opaque::<fn()>(move _11) -> [return: bb3, unwind continue];
+ _10 = opaque::<fn()>(copy _8) -> [return: bb3, unwind continue];
}
bb3: {
StorageDead(_11);
StorageDead(_10);
- StorageLive(_12);
+ nop;
StorageLive(_13);
- _13 = copy _7;
- _12 = move _13 as fn() (PointerCoercion(ClosureFnPointer(Safe)));
+ _13 = const ZeroSized: {closure@$DIR/gvn.rs:614:19: 614:21};
+ _12 = const ZeroSized: {closure@$DIR/gvn.rs:614:19: 614:21} as fn() (PointerCoercion(ClosureFnPointer(Safe)));
StorageDead(_13);
StorageLive(_14);
StorageLive(_15);
_15 = copy _12;
- _14 = opaque::<fn()>(move _15) -> [return: bb4, unwind continue];
+ _14 = opaque::<fn()>(copy _12) -> [return: bb4, unwind continue];
}
bb4: {
StorageDead(_15);
StorageDead(_14);
_0 = const ();
- StorageDead(_12);
- StorageDead(_8);
- StorageDead(_7);
- StorageDead(_4);
- StorageDead(_1);
+ nop;
+ nop;
+ nop;
+ nop;
+ nop;
return;
}
}