bors 2ff505ab48 Auto merge of #12428 - lowr:experimental/destructuring-assignment, r=flodiebold ... feat: implement destructuring assignment This is an attempt to implement destructuring assignments, or more specifically, type inference for [assignee expressions](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions.html#place-expressions-and-value-expressions). I'm not sure if this is the right approach, so I don't even expect this to be merged (hence the branch name 😉) but rather want to propose one direction we could choose. I don't mind getting merged if this is good enough though! Some notes on the implementation choices: - Assignee expressions are **not** desugared on HIR level unlike rustc, but are inferred directly along with other expressions. This matches the processing of other syntaxes that are desugared in rustc but not in r-a. I find this reasonable because r-a only needs to infer types and it's easier to relate AST nodes and HIR nodes, so I followed it. - Assignee expressions obviously resemble patterns, so type inference for each kind of pattern and its corresponding assignee expressions share a significant amount of logic. I tried to reuse the type inference functions for patterns by introducing `PatLike` trait which generalizes assignee expressions and patterns. - This is not the most elegant solution I suspect (and I really don't like the name of the trait!), but it's cleaner and the change is smaller than other ways I experimented, like making the functions generic without such trait, or making them take `Either<ExprId, PatId>` in place of `PatId`. in case this is merged: Closes #11532 Closes #11839 Closes #12322		2022-06-30 09:14:12 +00:00
..
src	Auto merge of #12428 - lowr:experimental/destructuring-assignment, r=flodiebold	2022-06-30 09:14:12 +00:00
Cargo.toml	internal: Bump Dependencies	2022-06-10 17:30:02 +02:00