When a method chain ending in `?` causes an E0277 because the
expression's `Result::Err` variant doesn't have a type that can be
converted to the `Result<_, E>` type parameter in the return type,
provide additional context of which parts of the chain can and can't
support the `?` operator.
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error to `String`
--> $DIR/question-mark-result-err-mismatch.rs:28:25
|
LL | fn bar() -> Result<(), String> {
| ------------------ expected `String` because of this
LL | let x = foo();
| ----- this can be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<String, String>`
LL | let one = x
LL | .map(|s| ())
| ----------- this can be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<(), String>`
LL | .map_err(|_| ())?;
| ---------------^ the trait `From<()>` is not implemented for `String`
| |
| this can't be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<(), ()>`
|
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
= help: the following other types implement trait `From<T>`:
<String as From<char>>
<String as From<Box<str>>>
<String as From<Cow<'a, str>>>
<String as From<&str>>
<String as From<&mut str>>
<String as From<&String>>
= note: required for `Result<(), String>` to implement `FromResidual<Result<Infallible, ()>>`
```
Fix#72124.
Add `deeply_normalize_for_diagnostics`, use it in coherence
r? lcnr
Normalize trait refs used for coherence error reporting with `-Ztrait-solver=next-coherence`.
Two things:
1. I said before that we can't add this to `TyErrCtxt` because we compute `OverlapResult`s even if there are no diagnostics being emitted, e.g. for a reservation impl.
2. I didn't want to add this to an `InferCtxtExt` trait because I felt it was unnecessary. I don't particularly care about the API though.
Pretty print `Fn<(..., ...)>` trait refs with parentheses (almost) always
It's almost always better, at least in diagnostics, to print `Fn(i32, u32)` instead of `Fn<(i32, u32)>`.
Related to but doesn't fix#118225. That needs a separate fix.
Add support for making lib features internal
We have the notion of an "internal" lang feature: a feature that is never intended to be stabilized, and using which can cause ICEs and other issues without that being considered a bug.
This extends that idea to lib features as well. It is an alternative to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115623: instead of using an attribute to declare lib features internal, we simply do this based on the name. Everything ending in `_internals` or `_internal` is considered internal.
Then we rename `core_intrinsics` to `core_intrinsics_internal`, which fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115597.
Make the following API stable:
// in core::any
pub fn type_name_of_val<T: ?Sized>(_val: &T) -> &'static str
Const stability is not added because this relies on `type_name` which is also
not const. That has a blocking issue.
Fixes#66359
Add support for `gen fn`
This builds on #116447 to add support for `gen fn` functions. For the most part we follow the same approach as desugaring `async fn`, but replacing `Future` with `Iterator` and `async {}` with `gen {}` for the body.
The version implemented here uses the return type of a `gen fn` as the yield type. For example:
```rust
gen fn count_to_three() -> i32 {
yield 1;
yield 2;
yield 3;
}
```
In the future, I think we should experiment with a syntax like `gen fn count_to_three() yield i32 { ... }`, but that can go in another PR.
cc `@oli-obk` `@compiler-errors`
Remove the `precise_pointer_size_matching` feature gate
`usize` and `isize` are special for pattern matching because their range might depend on the platform. To make code portable across platforms, the following is never considered exhaustive:
```rust
let x: usize = ...;
match x {
0..=18446744073709551615 => {}
}
```
Because of how rust handles constants, this also unfortunately counts `0..=usize::MAX` as non-exhaustive. The [`precise_pointer_size_matching`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56354) feature gate was introduced both for this convenience and for the possibility that the lang team could decide to allow the above.
Since then, [half-open range patterns](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67264) have been implemented, and since #116692 they correctly support `usize`/`isize`:
```rust
match 0usize { // exhaustive!
0..5 => {}
5.. => {}
}
```
I believe this subsumes all the use cases of the feature gate. Moreover no attempt has been made to stabilize it in the 5 years of its existence. I therefore propose we retire this feature gate.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56354
Tweak unclosed generics errors
Remove unnecessary span label for parse errors that already have a suggestion.
Provide structured suggestion to close generics in more cases.
Tweak `.clone()` suggestion to work in more cases
When going through auto-deref, the `<T as Clone>` impl sometimes needs to be specified for rustc to actually clone the value and not the reference.
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of dereference of `S`
--> $DIR/needs-clone-through-deref.rs:15:18
|
LL | for _ in self.clone().into_iter() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ ----------- value moved due to this method call
| |
| move occurs because value has type `Vec<usize>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
note: `into_iter` takes ownership of the receiver `self`, which moves value
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/iter/traits/collect.rs:LL:COL
help: you can `clone` the value and consume it, but this might not be your desired behavior
|
LL | for _ in <Vec<usize> as Clone>::clone(&self.clone()).into_iter() {}
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +
```
When encountering a move error, look for implementations of `Clone` for the moved type. If there is one, check if all its obligations are met. If they are, we suggest cloning without caveats. If they aren't, we suggest cloning while mentioning the unmet obligations, potentially suggesting `#[derive(Clone)]` when appropriate.
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of a shared reference
--> $DIR/suggest-clone-when-some-obligation-is-unmet.rs:20:28
|
LL | let mut copy: Vec<U> = map.clone().into_values().collect();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ ------------- value moved due to this method call
| |
| move occurs because value has type `HashMap<T, U, Hash128_1>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
note: `HashMap::<K, V, S>::into_values` takes ownership of the receiver `self`, which moves value
--> $SRC_DIR/std/src/collections/hash/map.rs:LL:COL
help: you could `clone` the value and consume it, if the `Hash128_1: Clone` trait bound could be satisfied
|
LL | let mut copy: Vec<U> = <HashMap<T, U, Hash128_1> as Clone>::clone(&map.clone()).into_values().collect();
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +
help: consider annotating `Hash128_1` with `#[derive(Clone)]`
|
LL + #[derive(Clone)]
LL | pub struct Hash128_1;
|
```
Fix#109429.
When encountering multiple mutable borrows, suggest cloning and adding
derive annotations as needed.
```
error[E0596]: cannot borrow `sm.x` as mutable, as it is behind a `&` reference
--> $DIR/accidentally-cloning-ref-borrow-error.rs:32:9
|
LL | foo(&mut sm.x);
| ^^^^^^^^^ `sm` is a `&` reference, so the data it refers to cannot be borrowed as mutable
|
help: `Str` doesn't implement `Clone`, so this call clones the reference `&Str`
--> $DIR/accidentally-cloning-ref-borrow-error.rs:31:21
|
LL | let mut sm = sr.clone();
| ^^^^^^^
help: consider annotating `Str` with `#[derive(Clone)]`
|
LL + #[derive(Clone)]
LL | struct Str {
|
help: consider specifying this binding's type
|
LL | let mut sm: &mut Str = sr.clone();
| ++++++++++
```
Fix#34629. Fix#76643. Fix#91532.
Structured `use` suggestion on privacy error
When encoutering a privacy error on an item through a re-export that is accessible in an alternative path, provide a structured suggestion with that path.
```
error[E0603]: module import `mem` is private
--> $DIR/private-std-reexport-suggest-public.rs:4:14
|
LL | use foo::mem;
| ^^^ private module import
|
note: the module import `mem` is defined here...
--> $DIR/private-std-reexport-suggest-public.rs:8:9
|
LL | use std::mem;
| ^^^^^^^^
note: ...and refers to the module `mem` which is defined here
--> $SRC_DIR/std/src/lib.rs:LL:COL
|
= note: you could import this
help: import `mem` through the re-export
|
LL | use std::mem;
| ~~~~~~~~
```
Fix#42909.
When encoutering a privacy error on an item through a re-export that is
accessible in an alternative path, provide a structured suggestion with
that path.
```
error[E0603]: module import `mem` is private
--> $DIR/private-std-reexport-suggest-public.rs:4:14
|
LL | use foo::mem;
| ^^^ private module import
|
note: the module import `mem` is defined here...
--> $DIR/private-std-reexport-suggest-public.rs:8:9
|
LL | use std::mem;
| ^^^^^^^^
note: ...and refers to the module `mem` which is defined here
--> $SRC_DIR/std/src/lib.rs:LL:COL
|
= note: you could import this
help: import `mem` through the re-export
|
LL | use std::mem;
| ~~~~~~~~
```
Fix#42909.
When encountering multiple mutable borrows, suggest cloning and adding
derive annotations as needed.
```
error[E0596]: cannot borrow `sm.x` as mutable, as it is behind a `&` reference
--> $DIR/accidentally-cloning-ref-borrow-error.rs:32:9
|
LL | foo(&mut sm.x);
| ^^^^^^^^^ `sm` is a `&` reference, so the data it refers to cannot be borrowed as mutable
|
help: `Str` doesn't implement `Clone`, so this call clones the reference `&Str`
--> $DIR/accidentally-cloning-ref-borrow-error.rs:31:21
|
LL | let mut sm = sr.clone();
| ^^^^^^^
help: consider annotating `Str` with `#[derive(Clone)]`
|
LL + #[derive(Clone)]
LL | struct Str {
|
help: consider specifying this binding's type
|
LL | let mut sm: &mut Str = sr.clone();
| ++++++++++
```
```
error[E0596]: cannot borrow `*inner` as mutable, as it is behind a `&` reference
--> $DIR/issue-91206.rs:14:5
|
LL | inner.clear();
| ^^^^^ `inner` is a `&` reference, so the data it refers to cannot be borrowed as mutable
|
help: you can `clone` the `Vec<usize>` value and consume it, but this might not be your desired behavior
--> $DIR/issue-91206.rs:11:17
|
LL | let inner = client.get_inner_ref();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: consider specifying this binding's type
|
LL | let inner: &mut Vec<usize> = client.get_inner_ref();
| +++++++++++++++++
```
When encountering a case where `let x: T = (val: &T).clone();` and
`T: !Clone`, already mention that the reference is being cloned. We now
also suggest `#[derive(Clone)]` not only on `T` but also on type
parameters to satisfy blanket implementations.
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/assignment-of-clone-call-on-ref-due-to-missing-bound.rs:17:39
|
LL | let mut x: HashSet<Day> = v.clone();
| ------------ ^^^^^^^^^ expected `HashSet<Day>`, found `&HashSet<Day>`
| |
| expected due to this
|
= note: expected struct `HashSet<Day>`
found reference `&HashSet<Day>`
note: `HashSet<Day>` does not implement `Clone`, so `&HashSet<Day>` was cloned instead
--> $DIR/assignment-of-clone-call-on-ref-due-to-missing-bound.rs:17:39
|
LL | let mut x: HashSet<Day> = v.clone();
| ^
= help: `Clone` is not implemented because the trait bound `Day: Clone` is not satisfied
help: consider annotating `Day` with `#[derive(Clone)]`
|
LL + #[derive(Clone)]
LL | enum Day {
|
```
Case taken from # #41825.
When encountering a move error, look for implementations of `Clone` for
the moved type. If there is one, check if all its obligations are met.
If they are, we suggest cloning without caveats. If they aren't, we
suggest cloning while mentioning the unmet obligations, potentially
suggesting `#[derive(Clone)]` when appropriate.
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of a shared reference
--> $DIR/suggest-clone-when-some-obligation-is-unmet.rs:20:28
|
LL | let mut copy: Vec<U> = map.clone().into_values().collect();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ ------------- value moved due to this method call
| |
| move occurs because value has type `HashMap<T, U, Hash128_1>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
note: `HashMap::<K, V, S>::into_values` takes ownership of the receiver `self`, which moves value
--> $SRC_DIR/std/src/collections/hash/map.rs:LL:COL
help: you could `clone` the value and consume it, if the `Hash128_1: Clone` trait bound could be satisfied
|
LL | let mut copy: Vec<U> = <HashMap<T, U, Hash128_1> as Clone>::clone(&map.clone()).into_values().collect();
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +
help: consider annotating `Hash128_1` with `#[derive(Clone)]`
|
LL + #[derive(Clone)]
LL | pub struct Hash128_1;
|
```
Fix#109429.
When going through auto-deref, the `<T as Clone>` impl sometimes needs
to be specified for rustc to actually clone the value and not the
reference.
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of dereference of `S`
--> $DIR/needs-clone-through-deref.rs:15:18
|
LL | for _ in self.clone().into_iter() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ ----------- value moved due to this method call
| |
| move occurs because value has type `Vec<usize>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
note: `into_iter` takes ownership of the receiver `self`, which moves value
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/iter/traits/collect.rs:LL:COL
help: you can `clone` the value and consume it, but this might not be your desired behavior
|
LL | for _ in <Vec<usize> as Clone>::clone(&self.clone()).into_iter() {}
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +
```
CC #109429.
Restrict what symbols can be used in `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` format strings
This commit restricts what symbols can be used in a format string for any option of the `diagnostic::on_unimplemented` attribute. We previously allowed all the ad-hoc options supported by the internal `#[rustc_on_unimplemented]` attribute. For the stable attribute we only want to support generic parameter names and `{Self}` as parameters. For any other parameter an warning is emitted and the parameter is replaced by the literal parameter string, so for example `{integer}` turns into `{integer}`. This follows the general design of attributes in the `#[diagnostic]` attribute namespace, that any syntax "error" is treated as warning and subsequently ignored.
r? `@compiler-errors`
This commit restricts what symbols can be used in a format string for
any option of the `diagnostic::on_unimplemented` attribute. We
previously allowed all the ad-hoc options supported by the internal
`#[rustc_on_unimplemented]` attribute. For the stable attribute we only
want to support generic parameter names and `{Self}` as parameters. For
any other parameter an warning is emitted and the parameter is replaced
by the literal parameter string, so for example `{integer}` turns into
`{integer}`. This follows the general design of attributes in the
`#[diagnostic]` attribute namespace, that any syntax "error" is treated
as warning and subsequently ignored.
Provide structured suggestion for type mismatch in loop
We currently provide only a `help` message, this PR introduces the last two structured suggestions instead:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/issue-98982.rs:2:5
|
LL | fn foo() -> i32 {
| --- expected `i32` because of return type
LL | / for i in 0..0 {
LL | | return i;
LL | | }
| |_____^ expected `i32`, found `()`
|
note: the function expects a value to always be returned, but loops might run zero times
--> $DIR/issue-98982.rs:2:5
|
LL | for i in 0..0 {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this might have zero elements to iterate on
LL | return i;
| -------- if the loop doesn't execute, this value would never get returned
help: return a value for the case when the loop has zero elements to iterate on
|
LL ~ }
LL ~ /* `i32` value */
|
help: otherwise consider changing the return type to account for that possibility
|
LL ~ fn foo() -> Option<i32> {
LL | for i in 0..0 {
LL ~ return Some(i);
LL ~ }
LL ~ None
|
```
Fix#98982.
Because a macro invocation can expand to a never pattern, we can't rule
out a `arm!(),` arm at parse time. Instead we detect that case at
expansion time, if the macro tries to output a pattern followed by `=>`.
move packed-struct tests into packed/ folder
We already have a bunch of other tests named `packed/packed-struct*`, no reason to have these two tests be separate.
Handle recursion limit for subtype and well-formed predicates
Adds a recursion limit check for subtype predicates and well-formed predicates.
`-Ztrait-solver=next` currently panics with unimplemented for these cases.
These cases are arguably bugs in the occurs check but:
- I could not find a simple way to fix the occurs check
- There should still be a recursion limit check to prevent hangs anyway.
closes#117151
r? types
Centralize live loans maintenance to fix scope differences due to liveness
As found in the recent [polonius crater run](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117593#issuecomment-1801398892), NLLs and the location-insensitive polonius computed different scopes on some specific CFG shapes, e.g. the following.
I had missed that liveness data was pushed from different sources than just the liveness computation: there are a few places that do this -- and some of them may be unneeded or at the very least untested, as no tests changed when I tried removing some of them.
Here, `_6` is e.g. dead on entry to `bb2[0]` during `liveness::trace`, but its regions will be marked as live later during "constraint generation" (which I plan to refactor away and put in the liveness module soon). This should cause the inflowing loans to be marked live, but they were only computed in `liveness::trace`.
Therefore, this PR moves live loan maintenance to `LivenessValues`, so that the various places pushing liveness data will all also update live loans at the same time -- except for promoteds which I don't believe need them, and their liveness handling is already interesting/peculiar.
All the regressions I saw in the initial crater run were related to this kind of shapes, and this change did fix all of them on the [next run](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117593#issuecomment-1826132145).
r? `@matthewjasper`
(This will conflict with #117880 but whichever lands first is fine by me, the end goal is the same for both)
Stabilize C string literals
RFC: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3348-c-str-literal.html
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105723
Documentation PR (reference manual): https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1423
# Stabilization report
Stabilizes C string and raw C string literals (`c"..."` and `cr#"..."#`), which are expressions of type [`&CStr`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/ffi/struct.CStr.html). Both new literals require Rust edition 2021 or later.
```rust
const HELLO: &core::ffi::CStr = c"Hello, world!";
```
C strings may contain any byte other than `NUL` (`b'\x00'`), and their in-memory representation is guaranteed to end with `NUL`.
## Implementation
Originally implemented by PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/108801, which was reverted due to unintentional changes to lexer behavior in Rust editions < 2021.
The current implementation landed in PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113476, which restricts C string literals to Rust edition >= 2021.
## Resolutions to open questions from the RFC
* Adding C character literals (`c'.'`) of type `c_char` is not part of this feature.
* Support for `c"..."` literals does not prevent `c'.'` literals from being added in the future.
* C string literals should not be blocked on making `&CStr` a thin pointer.
* It's possible to declare constant expressions of type `&'static CStr` in stable Rust (as of v1.59), so C string literals are not adding additional coupling on the internal representation of `CStr`.
* The unstable `concat_bytes!` macro should not accept `c"..."` literals.
* C strings have two equally valid `&[u8]` representations (with or without terminal `NUL`), so allowing them to be used in `concat_bytes!` would be ambiguous.
* Adding a type to represent C strings containing valid UTF-8 is not part of this feature.
* Support for a hypothetical `&Utf8CStr` may be explored in the future, should such a type be added to Rust.
generic_const_exprs: suggest to add the feature, not use it
Usually our missing feature messages look something like
```
= help: add `#![feature(inline_const)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
However `generic_const_exprs` used a different verb. That's inconsistent and it also means playground won't add that nice hyperlink to add the feature automatically. So let's use the same verb as everywhere else.
Add `-Zfunction-return={keep,thunk-extern}` option
This is intended to be used for Linux kernel RETHUNK builds.
With this commit (optionally backported to Rust 1.73.0), plus a patched Linux kernel to pass the flag, I get a RETHUNK build with Rust enabled that is `objtool`-warning-free and is able to boot in QEMU and load a sample Rust kernel module.
Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116853.
On Fn arg mismatch for a fn path, suggest a closure
When encountering a fn call that has a path to another fn being passed in, where an `Fn` impl is expected, and the arguments differ, suggest wrapping the argument with a closure with the appropriate arguments.
The last `help` is new:
```
error[E0631]: type mismatch in function arguments
--> $DIR/E0631.rs:9:9
|
LL | fn f(_: u64) {}
| ------------ found signature defined here
...
LL | foo(f);
| --- ^ expected due to this
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: expected function signature `fn(usize) -> _`
found function signature `fn(u64) -> _`
note: required by a bound in `foo`
--> $DIR/E0631.rs:3:11
|
LL | fn foo<F: Fn(usize)>(_: F) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `foo`
help: consider wrapping the function in a closure
|
LL | foo(|arg0: usize| f(/* u64 */));
| +++++++++++++ +++++++++++
```
This is intended to be used for Linux kernel RETHUNK builds.
With this commit (optionally backported to Rust 1.73.0), plus a
patched Linux kernel to pass the flag, I get a RETHUNK build with
Rust enabled that is `objtool`-warning-free and is able to boot in
QEMU and load a sample Rust kernel module.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Tweak message on ADT with private fields building
When trying to create an inaccessible ADT due to private fields, handle the case when no fields were passed.
```
error: cannot construct `Foo` with struct literal syntax due to private fields
--> $DIR/issue-76077.rs:8:5
|
LL | foo::Foo {};
| ^^^^^^^^
|
= note: private field `you_cant_use_this_field` that was not provided
```
Fix `PartialEq` args when `#[const_trait]` is enabled
This is based off of your PR that enforces effects on all methods, so just see the last commits.
r? fee1-dead
When encountering a fn call that has a path to another fn being passed
in, where an `Fn` impl is expected, and the arguments differ, suggest
wrapping the argument with a closure with the appropriate arguments.
When trying to create an inaccessible ADT due to private fields, handle
the case when no fields were passed.
```
error: cannot construct `Foo` with struct literal syntax due to private fields
--> $DIR/issue-76077.rs:8:5
|
LL | foo::Foo {};
| ^^^^^^^^
|
= note: private field `you_cant_use_this_field` that was not provided
```
ConstProp: Correctly remove const if unknown value assigned to it.
Closes#118328
The problematic sequence of MIR is:
```rust
_1 = const 0_usize;
_1 = const _; // This is an associated constant we can't know before monomorphization.
_0 = _1;
```
1. When `ConstProp::visit_assign` happens on `_1 = const 0_usize;`, it records that `0x0usize` is the value for `_1`.
2. Next `visit_assign` happens on `_1 = const _;`. Because the rvalue `.has_param()`, it can't be const evaled.
3. Finaly, `visit_assign` happens on `_0 = _1;`. Here it would think the value of `_1` was `0x0usize` from step 1.
The solution is to remove consts when checking the RValue fails, as they may have contained values that should now be invalidated, as that local was overwritten.
This should probably be back-ported to beta. Stable is more iffy, as it's gone unidentified since 1.70, so I only think it's worthwhile if there's another reason for a 1.74.1 release anyway.
Suggest `let` or `==` on typo'd let-chain
When encountering a bare assignment in a let-chain, suggest turning the
assignment into a `let` expression or an equality check.
```
error: expected expression, found `let` statement
--> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:5:8
|
LL | if let x = 1 && i = 2 {}
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: only supported directly in conditions of `if` and `while` expressions
help: you might have meant to continue the let-chain
|
LL | if let x = 1 && let i = 2 {}
| +++
help: you might have meant to compare for equality
|
LL | if let x = 1 && i == 2 {}
| +
```
Add `never_patterns` feature gate
This PR adds the feature gate and most basic parsing for the experimental `never_patterns` feature. See the tracking issue (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/118155) for details on the experiment.
`@scottmcm` has agreed to be my lang-team liaison for this experiment.
Fix coroutine validation for mixed panic strategy
Validation introduced in #113124 allows `UnwindAction::Continue` and `TerminatorKind::Resume` to occur only in functions with ABI that can unwind. The function ABI depends on the panic strategy, which can vary across crates.
Usually MIR is built and validated in the same crate. The coroutine drop glue thus far was an exception. As a result validation could fail when mixing different panic strategies.
Avoid the problem by executing `AbortUnwindingCalls` along with the validation.
Fixes#116953.
Eagerly return `ExprKind::Err` on `yield`/`await` in wrong coroutine context
This PR does 2 things:
1. Refuses to lower `.await` or `yield` when we are outside of the right coroutine context for the operator. Instead, we lower to `hir::ExprKind::Err`, to silence subsequent redundant errors.
2. Reworks a bit of the span tracking in `LoweringContext` to fix a bad span when we have something like `let x = [0; async_fn().await]` where the `await` is inside of an anon const. The span for the "item" still kinda sucks, since it overlaps with the `await` span, but at least it's accurate.
Validation introduced in #113124 allows UnwindAction::Continue and
TerminatorKind::Resume to occur only in functions with ABI that can
unwind. The function ABI depends on the panic strategy, which can vary
across crates.
Usually MIR is built and validated in the same crate. The coroutine drop
glue thus far was an exception. As a result validation could fail when
mixing different panic strategies.
Avoid the problem by executing AbortUnwindingCalls along with the
validation.
When encountering a bare assignment in a let-chain, suggest turning the
assignment into a `let` expression or an equality check.
```
error: expected expression, found `let` statement
--> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:5:8
|
LL | if let x = 1 && i = 2 {}
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: only supported directly in conditions of `if` and `while` expressions
help: you might have meant to continue the let-chain
|
LL | if let x = 1 && let i = 2 {}
| +++
help: you might have meant to compare for equality
|
LL | if let x = 1 && i == 2 {}
| +
```
effects: Run `enforce_context_effects` for all method calls
So that we also perform checks when overloaded `PartialEq`s are called.
r? `@compiler-errors`
rustc_span: Use correct edit distance start length for suggestions
Otherwise the suggestions can be off-base for non-ASCII identifiers. For example suggesting that `Ok` is a name similar to `读文`.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72553.
Account for `!` arm in tail `match` expr
On functions with a default return type that influences the coerced type of `match` arms, check if the failing arm is actually of type `!`. If so, suggest changing the return type so the coercion against the prior arms is successful.
```
error[E0308]: `match` arms have incompatible types
--> $DIR/match-tail-expr-never-type-error.rs:9:13
|
LL | fn bar(a: bool) {
| - help: try adding a return type: `-> i32`
LL | / match a {
LL | | true => 1,
| | - this is found to be of type `{integer}`
LL | | false => {
LL | | never()
| | ^^^^^^^
| | |
| | expected integer, found `()`
| | this expression is of type `!`, but it get's coerced to `()` due to its surrounding expression
LL | | }
LL | | }
| |_____- `match` arms have incompatible types
```
Fix#24157.
Do not erase late bound regions when selecting inherent associated types
In the fix for #97156 we would want the following code:
```rust
#![feature(inherent_associated_types)]
#![allow(incomplete_features)]
struct Foo<T>(T);
impl Foo<fn(&'static ())> {
type Assoc = u32;
}
trait Other {}
impl Other for u32 {}
// FIXME(inherent_associated_types): Avoid emitting two diagnostics (they only differ in span).
// FIXME(inherent_associated_types): Enhancement: Spruce up the diagnostic by saying something like
// "implementation is not general enough" as is done for traits via
// `try_report_trait_placeholder_mismatch`.
fn bar(_: Foo<for<'a> fn(&'a ())>::Assoc) {}
//~^ ERROR mismatched types
//~| ERROR mismatched types
fn main() {}
```
to fail with ...
```
error[E0220]: associated type `Assoc` not found for `Foo<for<'a> fn(&'a ())>` in the current scope
--> tests/ui/associated-inherent-types/issue-109789.rs:18:36
|
4 | struct Foo<T>(T);
| ------------- associated item `Assoc` not found for this struct
...
18 | fn bar(_: Foo<for<'a> fn(&'a ())>::Assoc) {}
| ^^^^^ associated item not found in `Foo<for<'a> fn(&'a ())>`
|
= note: the associated type was found for
- `Foo<fn(&'static ())>`
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0220`.
```
This PR fixes the ICE we are currently getting "was a subtype of Foo<Binder(fn(&ReStatic ()), [])> during selection but now it is not"
Also fixes#112631
r? `@lcnr`
On functions with a default return type that influences the coerced type
of `match` arms, check if the failing arm is actually of type `!`. If
so, suggest changing the return type so the coercion against the prior
arms is successful.
```
error[E0308]: `match` arms have incompatible types
--> $DIR/match-tail-expr-never-type-error.rs:9:13
|
LL | fn bar(a: bool) {
| - help: try adding a return type: `-> i32`
LL | / match a {
LL | | true => 1,
| | - this is found to be of type `{integer}`
LL | | false => {
LL | | never()
| | ^^^^^^^
| | |
| | expected integer, found `()`
| | this expression is of type `!`, but it get's coerced to `()` due to its surrounding expression
LL | | }
LL | | }
| |_____- `match` arms have incompatible types
```
Fix#24157.
Suggest swapping the order of `ref` and `box`
It is not valid grammar to write `ref box <ident>` in patterns, but `box ref <ident>` is.
This patch adds a diagnostic to suggest swapping them, analogous to what we do for `mut let`.
Add `debug_assert_nounwind` and convert `assert_unsafe_precondition`
`assert_unsafe_precondition` checks non-CTFE-evaluable conditions in runtime and performs no-op in compile time, while many of its current usage can be checked during const eval.
Rewrite exhaustiveness in one pass
This is at least my 4th attempt at this in as many years x) Previous attempts were all too complicated or too slow. But we're finally here!
The previous version of the exhaustiveness algorithm computed reachability for each arm then exhaustiveness of the whole match. Since each of these steps does roughly the same things, this rewrites the algorithm to do them all in one go. I also think this makes things much simpler.
I also rewrote the documentation of the algorithm in depth. Hopefully it's up-to-date and easier to follow now. Plz comment if anything's unclear.
r? `@oli-obk` I think you're one of the rare other people to understand the exhaustiveness algorithm?
cc `@varkor` I know you're not active anymore, but if you feel like having a look you might enjoy this :D
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79307
Don't ICE when encountering placeholders in implied bounds computation
I *could* fix this the right way, though I don't really want to think about the implications of the change. This should have minimal side-effects.
r? `@aliemjay`
Fixes#118286
Fixes error count display is different when there's only one error left
Supersedes #114759
### What did I do?
I did the small change in `rustc_errors` by hand. Then I did the other changes in `/compiler` by hand, those were just find replace on `*.rs` in the workspace. The changes in run-make are find replace for `run-make` in the workspace.
All other changes are blessed using `x test TEST --bless`. I blessed the tests that were blessed in #114759.
### how to review this nightmare
ping bors with an `r+`. You should check that my logic is sound and maybe quickly scroll through the diff, but fully verifying it seems fairly hard to impossible. I did my best to do this correctly.
Thank you `@adrianEffe` for bringing this up and your initial implementation.
cc `@flip1995,` you said you want to do a subtree sync asap
cc `@RalfJung` maybe you want to do a quick subtree sync afterwards as well for Miri
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
Add `Span` to `TraitBoundModifier`
This improves diagnostics for the message "`~const` is not allowed here", and also fixes the span that we use when desugaring `~const Tr` into `Tr<host>` in effects desugaring.
feat: make `let_binding_suggestion` more reasonable
This is my first PR for rustc, which trying to fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117894, I am not familiar with some internal api so maybe some modification here isn't the way to go, appreciated for any review suggestion.
Rework supertrait lint once again
I accidentally pushed the wrong commits because I totally didn't check I was on the right computer when updating #118026.
Sorry, this should address all the nits in #118026.
r? lcnr
improve tool-only help for multiple `#[default]` variants
When defining an enum with multiple `#[default]` variants, we emit a tool-only suggestion for every `#[default]`ed variant to remove all other `#[default]`s. This PR improves the suggestion to correctly handle the cases where one variant has multiple `#[default]`s and where different `#[default]`s have the same span due to macro expansions.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/118119
We currently provide only a `help` message, this PR introduces the last
two structured suggestions instead:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/issue-98982.rs:2:5
|
LL | fn foo() -> i32 {
| --- expected `i32` because of return type
LL | / for i in 0..0 {
LL | | return i;
LL | | }
| |_____^ expected `i32`, found `()`
|
note: the function expects a value to always be returned, but loops might run zero times
--> $DIR/issue-98982.rs:2:5
|
LL | for i in 0..0 {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this might have zero elements to iterate on
LL | return i;
| -------- if the loop doesn't execute, this value would never get returned
help: return a value for the case when the loop has zero elements to iterate on
|
LL ~ }
LL ~ /* `i32` value */
|
help: otherwise consider changing the return type to account for that possibility
|
LL ~ fn foo() -> Option<i32> {
LL | for i in 0..0 {
LL ~ return Some(i);
LL ~ }
LL ~ None
|
```
Fix#98982.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #118012 (Add support for global allocation in smir)
- #118013 (Enable Rust to use the EHCont security feature of Windows)
- #118100 (Enable profiler in dist-powerpc64-linux)
- #118142 (Tighten up link attributes for llvm-wrapper bindings)
- #118147 (Fix some unnecessary casts)
- #118161 (Allow defining opaques in `check_coroutine_obligations`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Allow defining opaques in `check_coroutine_obligations`
In the new trait solver, when an obligation stalls on an unresolved coroutine witness, we will stash away the *root* obligation, even if the stalled obligation is only a distant descendent of the root obligation, since the new solver is purely recursive.
This means that we may need to reprocess alias-relate obligations (and others) which may define opaque types in the new solver. Currently, we use the coroutine's def id as the defining anchor in `check_coroutine_obligations`, which will allow defining no opaque types, resulting in errors like:
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `{coroutine@<source>:6:5: 6:17} <: impl Clone`
--> <source>:6:5
|
6 | / move |_: ()| {
7 | | let () = yield ();
8 | | }
| |_____^ types differ
```
So this PR fixes the defining anchor and does the same trick as `check_opaque_well_formed`, where we manually compare opaques that were defined against their hidden types to make sure they weren't defined differently when processing these stalled coroutine obligations.
r? `@lcnr` cc `@cjgillot`
Add allow-by-default lint for unit bindings
### Example
```rust
#![warn(unit_bindings)]
macro_rules! owo {
() => {
let whats_this = ();
}
}
fn main() {
// No warning if user explicitly wrote `()` on either side.
let expr = ();
let () = expr;
let _ = ();
let _ = expr; //~ WARN binding has unit type
let pat = expr; //~ WARN binding has unit type
let _pat = expr; //~ WARN binding has unit type
// No warning for let bindings with unit type in macro expansions.
owo!();
// No warning if user explicitly annotates the unit type on the binding.
let pat: () = expr;
}
```
outputs
```
warning: binding has unit type `()`
--> $DIR/unit-bindings.rs:17:5
|
LL | let _ = expr;
| ^^^^-^^^^^^^^
| |
| this pattern is inferred to be the unit type `()`
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/unit-bindings.rs:3:9
|
LL | #![warn(unit_bindings)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
warning: binding has unit type `()`
--> $DIR/unit-bindings.rs:18:5
|
LL | let pat = expr;
| ^^^^---^^^^^^^^
| |
| this pattern is inferred to be the unit type `()`
warning: binding has unit type `()`
--> $DIR/unit-bindings.rs:19:5
|
LL | let _pat = expr;
| ^^^^----^^^^^^^^
| |
| this pattern is inferred to be the unit type `()`
warning: 3 warnings emitted
```
This lint is not triggered if any of the following conditions are met:
- The user explicitly annotates the binding with the `()` type.
- The binding is from a macro expansion.
- The user explicitly wrote `let () = init;`
- The user explicitly wrote `let pat = ();`. This is allowed for local lifetimes.
### Known Issue
It is known that this lint can trigger on some proc-macro generated code whose span returns false for `Span::from_expansion` because e.g. the proc-macro simply forwards user code spans, and otherwise don't have distinguishing syntax context compared to non-macro-generated code. For those kind of proc-macros, I believe the correct way to fix them is to instead emit identifers with span like `Span::mixed_site().located_at(user_span)`.
Closes#71432.
Remove `feature` from the list of well known check-cfg name
This PR removes `feature` from the list of well known check-cfg.
This is done for multiple reasons:
- Cargo is the source of truth, rustc shouldn't have any knowledge of it
- It creates a conflict between Cargo and rustc when there are no features defined.
In this case Cargo won't pass any `--check-cfg` for `feature` since no feature will ever be passed, but rustc by having in it's list adds a implicit `cfg(feature, values(any()))` which is completely wrong. Having any cfg `feature` is unexpected not allow any `feature` value.
While doing this, I took the opportunity to specialise the diagnostic a bit for the case above.
r? `@petrochenkov`
