Unify `Rvalue::Aggregate` paths in cg_ssa
In #123840 and #123886 I added two different codepaths for `Rvalue::Aggregate` in `cg_ssa`.
This merges them into one, since raw pointers are also immediates that can be built from the immediates of their "fields".
Avoid clone in `Comments::next`
`Comments::next`, in `rustc_ast_pretty`, has this comment:
```
// FIXME: This shouldn't probably clone lmao
```
The obvious thing to try is to return `Option<&Comment>` instead of `Option<Comment>`. But that leads to multiple borrows all over the place, because `Comments` must be borrowed from `PrintState` and then processed by `&mut self` methods within `PrintState`.
This PR instead rearranges things so that comments are consumed as they are used, preserving the `Option<Comment>` return type without requiring any cloning.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Remove `#[macro_use] extern crate rustc middle` from numerous crates
Because explicit importing of macros via `use` items is nicer (more standard and readable) than implicit importing via `#[macro_use]`. This PR mops up some cases I didn't get to in #124511.
r? `@saethlin`
The current way of stepping through each comment in `Comments` is a bit
weird. There is a `Vec<Comments>` and a `current` index, which is fine.
The `Comments::next` method clones the current comment but doesn't
advance `current`; the advancing instead happens in `print_comment`,
which is where each cloned comment is actually finally used (or not, in
some cases, if the comment fails to satisfy a predicate).
This commit makes things more iterator-like:
- `Comments::next` now advances `current` instead of `print_comment`.
- `Comments::peek` is added so you can inspect a comment and check a
predicate without consuming it.
- This requires splitting `PrintState::comments` into immutable and
mutable versions. The commit also moves the ref inside the `Option` of
the return type, to save callers from having to use `as_ref`/`as_mut`.
- It also requires adding `PrintState::peek_comment` alongside the
existing `PrintState::next_comment`. (The lifetimes in the signature
of `peek_comment` ended up more complex than I expected.)
We now have a neat separation between consuming (`next`) and
non-consuming (`peek`) uses of each comment. As well as being clearer,
this will facilitate the next commit that avoids unnecessary cloning.
Pretty-print let-else with added parenthesization when needed
Rustc used to produce invalid syntax for the following code, which is problematic because it means we cannot apply rustfmt to the output of `-Zunpretty=expanded`.
```rust
macro_rules! expr {
($e:expr) => { $e };
}
fn main() {
let _ = expr!(loop {}) else { return; };
}
```
```console
$ rustc repro.rs -Zunpretty=expanded | rustfmt
error: `loop...else` loops are not supported
--> <stdin>:9:29
|
9 | fn main() { let _ = loop {} else { return; }; }
| ---- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| `else` is attached to this loop
|
= note: consider moving this `else` clause to a separate `if` statement and use a `bool` variable to control if it should run
```
Unfortunately, we can't always offer a machine-applicable suggestion when there are subpatterns from macro expansion.
Co-Authored-By: Guillaume Boisseau <Nadrieril@users.noreply.github.com>
solve: all "non-structural" logging to trace
This enables us to start with `RUSTC_LOG=rustc_trait_selection::solve=debug` to figure out *where* something went wrong, to then separately use `trace` to get to the details.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Fix, document, and test parser and pretty-printer edge cases related to braced macro calls
_Review note: this is a deceptively small PR because it comes with 145 lines of docs and 196 lines of tests, and only 25 lines of compiler code changed. However, I recommend reviewing it 1 commit at a time because much of the effect of the code changes is non-local i.e. affecting code that is not visible in the final state of the PR. I have paid attention that reviewing the PR one commit at a time is as easy as I can make it. All of the code you need to know about is touched in those commits, even if some of those changes disappear by the end of the stack._
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119105. One case that is not relevant to `-Zunpretty=expanded`, but which came up as I'm porting #119105 and #118726 into `syn`'s printer and `prettyplease`'s printer where it **is** relevant, and is also relevant to rustc's `stringify!`, is statement boundaries in the vicinity of braced macro calls.
Rustc's AST pretty-printer produces invalid syntax for statements that begin with a braced macro call:
```rust
macro_rules! stringify_item {
($i:item) => {
stringify!($i)
};
}
macro_rules! repro {
($e:expr) => {
stringify_item!(fn main() { $e + 1; })
};
}
fn main() {
println!("{}", repro!(m! {}));
}
```
**Before this PR:** output is not valid Rust syntax.
```console
fn main() { m! {} + 1; }
```
```console
error: leading `+` is not supported
--> <anon>:1:19
|
1 | fn main() { m! {} + 1; }
| ^ unexpected `+`
|
help: try removing the `+`
|
1 - fn main() { m! {} + 1; }
1 + fn main() { m! {} 1; }
|
```
**After this PR:** valid syntax.
```console
fn main() { (m! {}) + 1; }
```
Uplift various `*Predicate` types into `rustc_type_ir`
Uplifts `ProjectionPredicate`, `ExistentialTraitRef`, `ExistentialProjection`, `TraitPredicate`, `NormalizesTo`, `CoercePredicate`, and `SubtypePredicate`.
Adds `rustc_type_ir_macros`, which semi-duplicates the derive for `TypeVisitable`, `TypeFoldable`, and `Lift`, but in a way that is interner-agnostic.
Moves `rustc_type_ir::trait_ref` to `rustc_type_ir::predicate`. The specific placement of all these structs doesn't matter b/c of glob imports, tho.
Refactoring after the `PlaceValue` addition
I added [`PlaceValue`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_codegen_ssa/mir/place/struct.PlaceValue.html) in #123775, but kept that one line-by-line simple because it touched so many places.
This goes through to add more helpers & docs, and change some `PlaceRef` to `PlaceValue` where the type didn't need to be included.
No behaviour changes -- the codegen is exactly the same.
It is impossible for expr here to be a braced macro call. Expr comes
from `parse_stmt_without_recovery`, in which macro calls are parsed by
`parse_stmt_mac`. See this part:
let kind = if (style == MacStmtStyle::Braces
&& self.token != token::Dot
&& self.token != token::Question)
|| self.token == token::Semi
|| self.token == token::Eof
{
StmtKind::MacCall(P(MacCallStmt { mac, style, attrs, tokens: None }))
} else {
// Since none of the above applied, this is an expression statement macro.
let e = self.mk_expr(lo.to(hi), ExprKind::MacCall(mac));
let e = self.maybe_recover_from_bad_qpath(e)?;
let e = self.parse_expr_dot_or_call_with(e, lo, attrs)?;
let e = self.parse_expr_assoc_with(
0,
LhsExpr::AlreadyParsed { expr: e, starts_statement: false },
)?;
StmtKind::Expr(e)
};
A braced macro call at the head of a statement is always either extended
into ExprKind::Field / MethodCall / Await / Try / Binary, or else
returned as StmtKind::MacCall. We can never get a StmtKind::Expr
containing ExprKind::MacCall containing brace delimiter.
The change to the test is a little goofy because the compiler was
guessing "correctly" before that `falsy! {}` is the condition as opposed
to the else body. But I believe this change is fundamentally correct.
Braced macro invocations in statement position are most often item-like
(`thread_local! {...}`) as opposed to parenthesized macro invocations
which are condition-like (`cfg!(...)`).
I didn't figure out how to reach this condition with `expr` containing
`ExprKind::MacCall`. All the approaches I tried ended up with the macro
call ending up in the `StmtKind::MacCall` case below instead.
In any case, from visual inspection this is a bugfix. If we do end up
with a `StmtKind::Expr` containing `ExprKind::MacCall` with brace
delimiter, it would not need ";" printed after it.
