Make the randomize feature of rustc_abi additive
The goal here is to make rust-analyzer able to build with the `rustc_private` versions of the rustc crates it depends on. See #116847
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #117592 (Use the correct span when emitting the `env!` result)
- #117613 (Remove from vacation and compiler review group)
- #117615 (Couple of small changes)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Couple of small changes
These are unrelated to each other, but they are each small enough that opening separate PR's doesn't make sense to me either.
* Remove a place where the parse driver query is stolen.
* Update an outdated doc comment
* Use correct crate name in `-Zprint-vtable-sizes` when using `#![crate_name = "..."]`.
Use the correct span when emitting the `env!` result
The span used for the `env!` resut changed in 1.73, due to 75df62d4a2 (from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114014).
This prevents [a lint in `plrustc`](https://github.com/tcdi/plrust/blob/main/plrustc/plrustc/src/lints/builtin_macros.rs#L54-L60)[^1] from working well, because the resulting span is not inside the region where the lint is `#[deny()]`ed.
[^1]: Perhaps worth noting that the `env_macro` diagnostic item comes from [the std fork used with PL/Rust](https://github.com/tcdi/postgrestd/blob/rust-1.73.0/library/core/src/macros/mod.rs#L944).
Unfortunately, I have no idea how to write a test for this since I don't think we can have a custom lint in a test. A suggestion was made to use a custom proc macro for it, but that seems pretty involved (frankly, I might not have time to do it).
r? ``@davidtwco`` (since they're the author of the PR with the regression)
P.S. We generally try to avoid bothering upstream about PL/Rust-specific stuff (we don't want to nag), but this seems like an actual bug, since the other similar macros, such as `option_env` use the other span (and are lintable as a result).
Derive `TyEncodable`/`TyDecodable` in `rustc_type_ir`
when `derive(TyEncodable)` or `derive(TyDecodable)` sees an `I` type parameter on a struct that has no `'tcx`, then parameterize the `TyEncoder`/`TyDecoder`'s interner over that variable rather than `TyCtxt<'tcx>`.
Also, emit where clauses for fields rather than generics.
enable parallel rustc front end in nightly builds
Refers to the [MCP](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/681), this pr does:
1. Enable the parallel front end in nightly builds, and keep the default number of threads as 1. Then users can use the parallel rustc front end via -Z threads=n option.
2. Set it up to serial front end for beta/stable builds via bootstrap.
3. Switch over the alt builders from parallel rustc to serial, so we have artifacts without parallel to test against the artifacts with parallel.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@cjgillot` `@nnethercote` `@bjorn3` `@Kobzol`
Make sure that predicates with unmentioned bound vars are still considered global in the old solver
In the old solver, we consider predicates with late-bound vars to not be "global":
9c8a2694fa/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs (L1840-L1844)
The implementation of `has_late_bound_vars` was modified in #115834 so that we'd properly anonymize binders that had late-bound vars but didn't reference them. This fixed an ICE.
However, this also led to a behavioral change in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117056#issuecomment-1775014545 for a couple of crates, which now consider `for<'a> GL33: Shader` (note the binder var that is *not* used in the predicate) to not be "global". This forces associated types to not be normalizable due to the old trait solver being dumb.
This PR distinguishes types which *reference* late-bound vars and binders which *have* late-bound vars. The latter is represented with the new type flag `TypeFlags::HAS_BINDER_VARS`, which is used when we only care about knowing whether binders have vars in their bound var list (even if they're not used, like for binder anonymization).
This should fix (after beta backport) the `luminance-gl` and `luminance-webgl` crates in #117056.
r? types
**(priority is kinda high on a review here given beta becomes stable on November 16.)**
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #110340 (Deref docs: expand and remove "smart pointer" qualifier)
- #116894 (Guarantee that `char` has the same size and alignment as `u32`)
- #117534 (clarify that the str invariant is a safety, not validity, invariant)
- #117562 (triagebot no-merges: exclude different case)
- #117570 (fallback for `construct_generic_bound_failure`)
- #117583 (Remove `'tcx` lifetime on `PlaceholderConst`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fallback for `construct_generic_bound_failure`
Fixes#117547
This case regressed at #115882.
In this context, `generic_param_scope` is produced by `RPITVisitor` and not included by `hir_owner`. Therefore, I've added a fallback to address this.
Update the alignment checks to match rust-lang/reference#1387
Previously, we had a special case to not check `Rvalue::AddressOf` in this pass because we weren't quite sure if pointers needed to be aligned in the Place passed to it: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112026
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1387 merged, this PR updates this pass to match. The behavior of the check is nearly unchanged, except we also avoid inserting a check for creating references. Most of the changes in this PR are cleanup and new tests.
consts: remove dead code around `i1` constant values
`LLVMConstZext` recently got deleted, and it turns out (thanks to `@nikic` for knowing!) that this is dead code. Tests all pass for me without this logic, and per nikic:
> We always generate constants in "relocatable bag of bytes"
> representation, so you're never going to get a plain bool.
So this should be a safe thing to do.
r? `@nikic`
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
Use `filter_map` in `try_par_for_each_in`
This simplifies the expression, especially for the rayon part, and also
lets us drop the `E: Copy` constraint.
Cleanup `rustc_mir_build/../check_match.rs`
The file had become pretty unwieldy, with a fair amount of duplication. As a bonus, I discovered that we weren't running some pattern checks in if-let chains.
I recommend looking commit-by-commit. The last commit is a whim, I think it makes more sense that way but I don't hold this opinion strongly.
They've been deprecated for four years.
This commit includes the following changes.
- It eliminates the `rustc_plugin_impl` crate.
- It changes the language used for lints in
`compiler/rustc_driver_impl/src/lib.rs` and
`compiler/rustc_lint/src/context.rs`. External lints are now called
"loaded" lints, rather than "plugins" to avoid confusion with the old
plugins. This only has a tiny effect on the output of `-W help`.
- E0457 and E0498 are no longer used.
- E0463 is narrowed, now only relating to unfound crates, not plugins.
- The `plugin` feature was moved from "active" to "removed".
- It removes the entire plugins chapter from the unstable book.
- It removes quite a few tests, mostly all of those in
`tests/ui-fulldeps/plugin/`.
Closes#29597.
`LLVMConstZext` recently got deleted, and it turns out (thanks to @nikic
for knowing!) that this is dead code. Tests all pass for me without this
logic, and per nikic:
> We always generate constants in "relocatable bag of bytes"
> representation, so you're never going to get a plain bool.
So this should be a safe thing to do.
r? @nikic
@rustbot label: +llvm-main
Fix incorrect trait bound restriction suggestion
Suggest
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait<T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++
```
instead of
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait + <T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++++
```
Fix#117501.
