Tweak suggestions when using incorrect type of enum literal
More accurate suggestions when writing wrong style of enum variant literal:
```
error[E0533]: expected value, found struct variant `E::Empty3`
--> $DIR/empty-struct-braces-expr.rs:18:14
|
LL | let e3 = E::Empty3;
| ^^^^^^^^^ not a value
|
help: you might have meant to create a new value of the struct
|
LL | let e3 = E::Empty3 {};
| ++
```
```
error[E0533]: expected value, found struct variant `E::V`
--> $DIR/struct-literal-variant-in-if.rs:10:13
|
LL | if x == E::V { field } {}
| ^^^^ not a value
|
help: you might have meant to create a new value of the struct
|
LL | if x == (E::V { field }) {}
| + +
```
```
error[E0618]: expected function, found enum variant `Enum::Unit`
--> $DIR/suggestion-highlights.rs:15:5
|
LL | Unit,
| ---- enum variant `Enum::Unit` defined here
...
LL | Enum::Unit();
| ^^^^^^^^^^--
| |
| call expression requires function
|
help: `Enum::Unit` is a unit enum variant, and does not take parentheses to be constructed
|
LL - Enum::Unit();
LL + Enum::Unit;
|
```
```
error[E0599]: no variant or associated item named `tuple` found for enum `Enum` in the current scope
--> $DIR/suggestion-highlights.rs:36:11
|
LL | enum Enum {
| --------- variant or associated item `tuple` not found for this enum
...
LL | Enum::tuple;
| ^^^^^ variant or associated item not found in `Enum`
|
help: there is a variant with a similar name
|
LL | Enum::Tuple(/* i32 */);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;
|
```
Tweak "field not found" suggestion when giving struct literal for tuple struct type:
```
error[E0560]: struct `S` has no field named `x`
--> $DIR/nested-non-tuple-tuple-struct.rs:8:19
|
LL | pub struct S(f32, f32);
| - `S` defined here
...
LL | let _x = (S { x: 1.0, y: 2.0 }, S { x: 3.0, y: 4.0 });
| ^ field does not exist
|
help: `S` is a tuple struct, use the appropriate syntax
|
LL | let _x = (S(/* f32 */, /* f32 */), S { x: 3.0, y: 4.0 });
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Handle .init_array link_section specially on wasm
Given that wasm-ld now has support for [.init_array](8f2bd8ae68/llvm/lib/MC/WasmObjectWriter.cpp (L1852)), it appears we can easily implement that section by falling through to the normal path rather than taking the typical custom_section path for wasm.
The wasm-ld appears to have a bunch of limitations. Only one static with the `link_section` in a crate or else you hit the fatal error in the link above "only one .init_array section fragment supported". They do not get merged.
You can still call multiple constructors by setting it to an array.
```
unsafe extern "C" fn ctor() {
println!("foo");
}
#[used]
#[link_section = ".init_array"]
static FOO: [unsafe extern "C" fn(); 2] = [ctor, ctor];
```
Another issue appears to be that if crate *A* depends on crate *B*, but *A* doesn't call any symbols from *B* and *B* doesn't `#[export_name = ...]` any symbols, then crate *B*'s constructor will not be called. The workaround to this is to provide an exported symbol in crate *B*.
Use more accurate span for `addr_of!` suggestion
Use a multipart suggestion instead of a single whole-span replacement:
```
error[E0796]: creating a shared reference to a mutable static
--> $DIR/reference-to-mut-static-unsafe-fn.rs:10:18
|
LL | let _y = &X;
| ^^ shared reference to mutable static
|
= note: this shared reference has lifetime `'static`, but if the static ever gets mutated, or a mutable reference is created, then any further use of this shared reference is Undefined Behavior
help: use `addr_of!` instead to create a raw pointer
|
LL | let _y = addr_of!(X);
| ~~~~~~~~~ +
```
Mention that type parameters are used recursively on bivariance error
Right now when a type parameter is used recursively, even with indirection (so it has a finite size) we say that the type parameter is unused:
```
struct B<T>(Box<B<T>>);
```
This is confusing, because the type parameter is *used*, it just doesn't have its variance constrained. This PR tweaks that message to mention that it must be used *non-recursively*.
Not sure if we should actually mention "variance" here, but also I'd somewhat prefer we don't keep the power users in the dark w.r.t the real underlying issue, which is that the variance isn't constrained. That technical detail is reserved for a note, though.
cc `@fee1-dead`
Fixes#118976Fixes#26283Fixes#53191Fixes#105740Fixes#110466
Use a multipart suggestion instead of a single whole-span replacement:
```
error[E0796]: creating a shared reference to a mutable static
--> $DIR/reference-to-mut-static-unsafe-fn.rs:10:18
|
LL | let _y = &X;
| ^^ shared reference to mutable static
|
= note: this shared reference has lifetime `'static`, but if the static ever gets mutated, or a mutable reference is created, then any further use of this shared reference is Undefined Behavior
help: use `addr_of!` instead to create a raw pointer
|
LL | let _y = addr_of!(X);
| ~~~~~~~~~ +
```
```
error[E0533]: expected value, found struct variant `E::Empty3`
--> $DIR/empty-struct-braces-expr.rs:18:14
|
LL | let e3 = E::Empty3;
| ^^^^^^^^^ not a value
|
help: you might have meant to create a new value of the struct
|
LL | let e3 = E::Empty3 {};
| ++
```
```
error[E0533]: expected value, found struct variant `E::V`
--> $DIR/struct-literal-variant-in-if.rs:10:13
|
LL | if x == E::V { field } {}
| ^^^^ not a value
|
help: you might have meant to create a new value of the struct
|
LL | if x == (E::V { field }) {}
| + +
```
```
error[E0618]: expected function, found enum variant `Enum::Unit`
--> $DIR/suggestion-highlights.rs:15:5
|
LL | Unit,
| ---- enum variant `Enum::Unit` defined here
...
LL | Enum::Unit();
| ^^^^^^^^^^--
| |
| call expression requires function
|
help: `Enum::Unit` is a unit enum variant, and does not take parentheses to be constructed
|
LL - Enum::Unit();
LL + Enum::Unit;
|
```
```
error[E0599]: no variant or associated item named `tuple` found for enum `Enum` in the current scope
--> $DIR/suggestion-highlights.rs:36:11
|
LL | enum Enum {
| --------- variant or associated item `tuple` not found for this enum
...
LL | Enum::tuple;
| ^^^^^ variant or associated item not found in `Enum`
|
help: there is a variant with a similar name
|
LL | Enum::Tuple(/* i32 */);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;
|
```
More accurate span for type parameter suggestion
After:
```
error[E0229]: associated item constraints are not allowed here
--> $DIR/impl-block-params-declared-in-wrong-spot-issue-113073.rs:3:10
|
LL | impl Foo<T: Default> for String {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^ associated item constraint not allowed here
|
help: declare the type parameter right after the `impl` keyword
|
LL - impl Foo<T: Default> for String {}
LL + impl<T: Default> Foo<T> for String {}
|
```
Before:
```
error[E0229]: associated item constraints are not allowed here
--> $DIR/impl-block-params-declared-in-wrong-spot-issue-113073.rs:3:10
|
LL | impl Foo<T: Default> for String {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^ associated item constraint not allowed here
|
help: declare the type parameter right after the `impl` keyword
|
LL | impl<T: Default> Foo<T> for String {}
| ++++++++++++ ~
```
Fix associated item removal suggestion
We were previously telling people to write what was already there, instead of removal (treating it as a `help`). We now properly suggest to remove the code that needs to be removed.
```
error[E0229]: associated item constraints are not allowed here
--> $DIR/E0229.rs:13:25
|
LL | fn baz<I>(x: &<I as Foo<A = Bar>>::A) {}
| ^^^^^^^ associated item constraint not allowed here
|
help: consider removing this associated item binding
|
LL - fn baz<I>(x: &<I as Foo<A = Bar>>::A) {}
LL + fn baz<I>(x: &<I as Foo>::A) {}
|
```
After:
```
error[E0229]: associated item constraints are not allowed here
--> $DIR/impl-block-params-declared-in-wrong-spot-issue-113073.rs:3:10
|
LL | impl Foo<T: Default> for String {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^ associated item constraint not allowed here
|
help: declare the type parameter right after the `impl` keyword
|
LL - impl Foo<T: Default> for String {}
LL + impl<T: Default> Foo<T> for String {}
|
```
Before:
```
error[E0229]: associated item constraints are not allowed here
--> $DIR/impl-block-params-declared-in-wrong-spot-issue-113073.rs:3:10
|
LL | impl Foo<T: Default> for String {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^ associated item constraint not allowed here
|
help: declare the type parameter right after the `impl` keyword
|
LL | impl<T: Default> Foo<T> for String {}
| ++++++++++++ ~
```
We were previously telling people to write what was already there, instead of removal.
```
error[E0229]: associated item constraints are not allowed here
--> $DIR/E0229.rs:13:25
|
LL | fn baz<I>(x: &<I as Foo<A = Bar>>::A) {}
| ^^^^^^^ associated item constraint not allowed here
|
help: consider removing this associated item binding
|
LL - fn baz<I>(x: &<I as Foo<A = Bar>>::A) {}
LL + fn baz<I>(x: &<I as Foo>::A) {}
|
```
Automatically taint when reporting errors from ItemCtxt
This isn't very robust yet, as you need to use `itemctxt.dcx()` instead of `tcx.dcx()` for it to take effect, but it's at least more convenient than sprinkling `set_tainted_by_errors` calls in individual places.
based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127357
r? `@fmease`
Move trait selection error reporting to its own top-level module
This effectively moves `rustc_trait_selection::traits::error_reporting` to `rustc_trait_selection::error_reporting::traits`. There are only a couple of actual changes to the code, like moving the `pretty_impl_header` fn out of the specialization module for privacy reasons.
This is quite pointless on its own, but having `error_reporting` as a top-level module in `rustc_trait_selection` is very important to make sure we have a meaningful file structure for when we move **type** error reporting (and region error reporting, with which it's incredibly entangled currently) into `rustc_trait_selection`. I've opened a tracking issue here: #127492
r? lcnr
Uplift elaboration into `rustc_type_ir`
Allows us to deduplicate and consolidate elaboration (including these stupid elaboration duplicate fns i added for pretty printing like 3 years ago) so I'm pretty hyped about this change :3
r? lcnr
Make `can_eq` process obligations (almost) everywhere
Move `can_eq` to an extension trait on `InferCtxt` in `rustc_trait_selection`, and change it so that it processes obligations. This should strengthen it to be more accurate in some cases, but is most important for the new trait solver which delays relating aliases to `AliasRelate` goals. Without this, we always basically just return true when passing aliases to `can_eq`, which can lead to weird errors, for example #127149.
I'm not actually certain if we should *have* `can_eq` be called on the good path. In cases where we need `can_eq`, we probably should just be using a regular probe.
Fixes#127149
r? lcnr
Remove a use of `StructuredDiag`, which is incompatible with automatic error tainting and error translations
fixes#127219
I want to remove all of `StructuredDiag`, but it's a bit more involved as it is also used from the `ItemCtxt`, which doesn't support tainting yet.
Introduce a `rustc_` attribute to dump all the `DefId` parents of a `DefId`
We've run into a bunch of issues with anon consts having the wrong generics and it would have been incredibly helpful to be able to quickly slap a `rustc_` attribute to check what `tcx.parent(` will return on the relevant DefIds.
I wasn't sure of a better way to make this work for anon consts than requiring the attribute to be on the enclosing item and then walking the inside of it to look for any anon consts. This particular method will honestly break at some point when we stop having a `DefId` available for anon consts in hir but that's for another day...
r? ``@compiler-errors``
