Don't typecheck recovered method call from suggestion
Only make the use-dot-operator-to-call-method suggestion, but do not double down and use the recovered type to perform method call typechecking as it will produce confusing diagnostics relevant for the *fixed* code.
### Code Sample
```rust
struct Client;
impl Client {
fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {}
}
fn f() {
let c = Client;
post(c, ());
}
```
### Before This PR
```
error[[E0277]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0277.html): cannot add `()` to `()`
--> src/lib.rs:9:5
|
9 | post(c, ());
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ no implementation for `() + ()`
|
= help: the trait `Add` is not implemented for `()`
note: required by a bound in `Client::post`
--> src/lib.rs:4:16
|
4 | fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Client::post`
error[[E0061]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0061.html): this function takes 2 arguments but 1 argument was supplied
--> src/lib.rs:9:5
|
9 | post(c, ());
| ^^^^ an argument of type `()` is missing
|
note: method defined here
--> src/lib.rs:4:8
|
4 | fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {}
| ^^^^ ----- ---- ----
help: provide the argument
|
9 | post((), ())(c, ());
| ++++++++
error[[E0425]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0425.html): cannot find function `post` in this scope
--> src/lib.rs:9:5
|
9 | post(c, ());
| ^^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: use the `.` operator to call the method `post` on `&Client`
|
9 - post(c, ());
9 + c.post(());
|
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0061, E0277, E0425.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0061`.
```
### After This PR
```
error[E0425]: cannot find function `post` in this scope
--> tests/ui/typeck/issue-106929.rs:9:5
|
9 | post(c, ());
| ^^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: use the `.` operator to call the method `post` on `&Client`
|
9 - post(c, ());
9 + c.post(());
|
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`.
```
Fixes#106929.
`EarlyBinder::new` -> `EarlyBinder::bind`
for consistency with `Binder::bind`. it may make sense to also add `EarlyBinder::dummy` in places where we know that no parameters exist, but I left that out of this PR.
r? `@jackh726` `@kylematsuda`
bootstrap: Various Step refactors
This ended up being a bunch of only somewhat related changes, sorry 😓 on the bright side, they're all fairly small and well-commented in the commit messages.
- Document `ShouldRun::crates`
- Switch Steps from crates to crate_or_deps where possible
and document why the single remaining place can't switch
- Switch doc::{Std, Rustc} to `crate_or_deps`
Previously they were using `all_krates` and various hacks to determine
which crates to document. Switch them to `crate_or_deps` so `ShouldRun`
tells them which crate to document instead of having to guess.
This also makes a few other refactors:
- Remove the now unused `all_krates`; new code should only use
`crate_or_deps`.
- Add tests for documenting Std
- Remove the unnecessary `run_cargo_rustdoc_for` closure so that we only
run cargo once
- Give a more helpful error message when documenting a no_std target
- Use `builder.msg` in the Steps instead of `builder.info`
- Extend `msg` and `description` to work with any subcommand
Previously `description` only supported `Testing` and `Benchmarking`,
and `msg` gave weird results for `doc` (it would say `Docing`).
- Add a `make_run_crates` function and use it Rustc and Std
This fixes the panic from the previous commit.
- Allow checking individual crates
This is useful for profiling metadata generation.
This comes very close to removing all_krates, but doesn't quite -
there's one last usage left in `doc`. This is fixed in a later commit.
- Give a more helpful error when calling `cargo_crates_in_set` for an alias
Before:
```
thread 'main' panicked at 'no entry found for key', builder.rs:110:30
```
After:
```
thread 'main' panicked at 'missing crate for path library', check.rs:89:26
```
fix: dedup `static_candidates` before report
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103646
`record_static_candidate` had been executed twice, resulting in the presence of two identical `CandidateSource::Trait(Cat)` in static_candidates. This PR aims to deduplication the `static_candidates` list, allowing it to execute `suggest_associated_call_syntax` properly.
Uplift `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint into two lints.
## `invalid_from_utf8_unchecked`
(deny-by-default)
The `invalid_from_utf8_unchecked` lint checks for calls to `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut` with an invalid UTF-8 literal.
### Example
```rust
unsafe {
std::str::from_utf8_unchecked(b"cl\x82ippy");
}
```
### Explanation
Creating such a `str` would result in undefined behavior as per documentation for `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut`.
## `invalid_from_utf8`
(warn-by-default)
The `invalid_from_utf8` lint checks for calls to `std::str::from_utf8` and `std::str::from_utf8_mut` with an invalid UTF-8 literal.
### Example
```rust
std::str::from_utf8(b"ru\x82st");
```
### Explanation
Trying to create such a `str` would always return an error as per documentation for `std::str::from_utf8` and `std::str::from_utf8_mut`.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
````@rustbot```` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
-----
For Clippy:
changelog: Moves: Uplifted `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` into rustc
Optimize scalar and scalar pair representations loaded from ByRef in llvm
in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105653 I noticed that we were generating suboptimal LLVM IR if we had a `ConstValue::ByRef` that could be represented by a `ScalarPair`. Before https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105653 this is probably rare, but after it, every slice will go down this suboptimal code path that requires LLVM to untangle a bunch of indirections and translate static allocations that are only used once to read a scalar pair from.
Only make the use-dot-operator-to-call-method suggestion, but do not
double down and use the recovered type to perform method call
typechecking as it will produce confusing diagnostics on the "fixed"
code.
Make `TrustedStep` require `Copy`
All the implementations of the trait already are `Copy`, and this seems to be enough to simplify the implementations enough to make the MIR inliner willing to inline basics like `Range::next`.
r? `@thomcc`
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #111558 (Move tests)
- #111827 (Add build instructions for cranelift backend as part of Rust repo)
- #111988 (Make `TyKind: Debug` have less verbose output)
- #112022 (Check nested obligations during coercion unify in new solver)
- #112057 (Suggest correct `self_ty`)
- #112063 (Add a test for issue 110457/incremental ICE with closures with the same span)
Failed merges:
- #112068 (Move tests from `ui/discrim` dir)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
All the implementations of the trait already are `Copy`, and this seems to be enough to simplify the implementations enough to make the MIR inliner willing to inline basics like `Range::next`.
Add a test for issue 110457/incremental ICE with closures with the same span
Closes#110457
It's probably possible to minimize the test case more, considering that we now know the underlying reason for the ICE, but I didn't.
r? `@cjgillot`
Make `TyKind: Debug` have less verbose output
Current `TyKind: Debug` impl is basically unusable for debugging, its too verbose even for verbose debugging 🤣 This PR replaces the debug logic for `TyKind` with a more manual debug impl instead of a hand expanded derived impl. This should help make #107084 more reasonable to land since the output of `Ty: Debug` will be better.
This isn't a fully completed change to the `Debug` impl of `TyKind` as there's still logic from the derive macro for some variants. Some of the variants are also not consisten with the `-Zverbose` printing of `Ty`, ideally `-Zverbose` printing of `Ty` would also just defer to the debug impl instead of having lots of checks in pretty printing. I plan on fixing this in follow up PRs since it seems tricky to do in this one and its already a large PR 😅
Add build instructions for cranelift backend as part of Rust repo
All other instructions assume that user works with separate repository than Rust compiler repository. When one follows default instructions, cranelift codegen tries to use different sys-root and compiler internal crates which leads to compiler errors when building it.
I needed to do all this steps while adding new intrinsic to rustc.
r? bjorn3
- Switch from `cargo rustdoc` to `cargo doc`
This allows passing `-p` to multiple packages.
- Remove `OsStr` support
It doesn't work with RUSTDOCFLAGS, and we don't support non-utf8 paths
anyway.
- Pass `-p std` for each crate in the standard library
By default cargo only documents the top-level crate, which is
`sysroot` and has no docs.
Previously they were using `all_krates` and various hacks to determine
which crates to document. Switch them to `crate_or_deps` so `ShouldRun`
tells them which crate to document instead of having to guess.
This also makes a few other refactors:
- Remove the now unused `all_krates`; new code should only use
`crate_or_deps`.
- Add tests for documenting Std
- Remove the unnecessary `run_cargo_rustdoc_for` closure so that we only
run cargo once
- Give a more helpful error message when documenting a no_std target
- Use `builder.msg` in the Steps instead of `builder.info`
This is useful for profiling metadata generation.
This comes very close to removing all_krates, but doesn't quite -
there's one last usage left in `doc`.
Load only the crate header for `locator::crate_matches`
Previously, we used the following info to determine whether to load the crate:
1. The METADATA_HEADER, which includes a METADATA_VERSION constant
2. The embedded rustc version
3. Various metadata in the `CrateRoot`, including the SVH
This worked ok most of the time. Unfortunately, when building locally the rustc version is always
the same because `omit-git-hash` is on by default. That meant that we depended only on 1 and 3, and
we are not very good about bumping METADATA_VERSION (it's currently at 7) so in practice we were
only depending on 3. `CrateRoot` is a very large struct and changes somewhat regularly, so this led
to a steady stream of crashes from trying to load it.
Change the logic to add an intermediate step between 2 and 3: introduce a new `CrateHeader` struct
that contains only the minimum info needed to decide whether the crate should be loaded or not. That
avoids having to load all of `CrateRoot`, which in practice means we should crash much less often.
Note that this works because the SVH should be different between any two dependencies, even if the
compiler has changed, because we use `-Zbinary-dep-depinfo` in bootstrap. See
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111329#issuecomment-1538303474 for more details about how the
original crash happened.
Use `Cow` in `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage`.
Each of `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}` has a comment:
```
// FIXME(davidtwco): can a `Cow<'static, str>` be used here?
```
This commit answers that question in the affirmative. It's not the most compelling change ever, but it might be worth merging.
This requires changing the `impl<'a> From<&'a str>` impls to `impl From<&'static str>`, which involves a bunch of knock-on changes that require/result in call sites being a little more precise about exactly what kind of string they use to create errors, and not just `&str`. This will result in fewer unnecessary allocations, though this will not have any notable perf effects given that these are error paths.
Note that I was lazy within Clippy, using `to_string` in a few places to preserve the existing string imprecision. I could have used `impl Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` in various places as is done in the compiler, but that would have required changes to *many* call sites (mostly changing `&format("...")` to `format!("...")`) which didn't seem worthwhile.
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #112029 (Recover upon mistyped error on typo'd `const` in const param def)
- #112037 (Add details about `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` to E0133)
- #112039 (compiler: update solaris/illumos to enable tsan support.)
- #112042 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)
- #112045 (Followup to #111973)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Recover upon mistyped error on typo'd `const` in const param def
And add machine-applicable fix for the typo'd `const` keyword.
### Before
```
error: expected one of `,`, `:`, `=`, or `>`, found `N`
--> src/lib.rs:1:18
|
1 | pub fn bar<Const N: u8>() {}
| ^ expected one of `,`, `:`, `=`, or `>`
```
### After This PR
```
error: `const` keyword was mistyped as `Const`
--> test.rs:1:8
|
1 | fn bar<Const N: u8>() {}
| ^^^^^
|
help: use the `const` keyword
|
1 | fn bar<const N: u8>() {}
| ~~~~~
```
Fixes#111941.
Inline derived `hash`
Because most of the other derived functions are inlined: `clone`, `default`, `eq`, `partial_cmp`, `cmp`. The exception is `fmt`, but it tends to not be on hot paths as much.
r? `@ghost`
Each of `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}` has a comment:
```
// FIXME(davidtwco): can a `Cow<'static, str>` be used here?
```
This commit answers that question in the affirmative. It's not the most
compelling change ever, but it might be worth merging.
This requires changing the `impl<'a> From<&'a str>` impls to `impl
From<&'static str>`, which involves a bunch of knock-on changes that
require/result in call sites being a little more precise about exactly
what kind of string they use to create errors, and not just `&str`. This
will result in fewer unnecessary allocations, though this will not have
any notable perf effects given that these are error paths.
Note that I was lazy within Clippy, using `to_string` in a few places to
preserve the existing string imprecision. I could have used `impl
Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` in various places as is done in the
compiler, but that would have required changes to *many* call sites
(mostly changing `&format("...")` to `format!("...")`) which didn't seem
worthwhile.
