Fixes 5395
In PR 5239 we switched from using `structopt` to `clap`. It seems that
the default behavior for `clap` is to override the `--version` flag,
which prevented our custom version display code from running.
The fix as outlined in https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/issues/3405 was
to set `#[clap(global_setting(AppSettings::NoAutoVersion))]` to prevent
clap from setting its own default behavior for the `--version` flag.
In fc357039f9 `#[main]` was removed and replaced with `#[rustc_main]`.
In some place the rename was forgotten, which makes the current code
confusing, because at first glance it seems that `#[main]` is still
around. Perform the renames also in these places.
Older llvm has the pre-C++17 restriction on success and failure memory
ordering, requiring the former to be at least as strong as the latter.
So, for llvm 12, this upgrades the success ordering to a stronger one if
necessary.
Create elided lifetime parameters for function-like types
Split from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97720
This PR refactor lifetime generic parameters in bare function types and parenthesized traits to introduce the additional required lifetimes as fresh parameters in a `for<>` bound.
This PR does the same to lifetimes appearing in closure signatures, and as-if introducing `for<>` bounds on closures (without the associated change in semantics).
r? `@petrochenkov`
Document unstable `--extern` options
These are needed for Cargo's `build-std` feature and for anyone who wanted to do a similar thing outside of Cargo.
Point at return expression for RPIT-related error
Certainly this needs some diagnostic refining, but I wanted to show that it was possible first and foremost. Not sure if this is the right approach. Open to feedback.
Fixes#80583
clarify how Rust atomics correspond to C++ atomics
``@cbeuw`` noted in https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1963 that the correspondence between C++ atomics and Rust atomics is not quite as obvious as one might think, since in Rust I can use `get_mut` to treat previously non-atomic data as atomic. However, I think using C++20 `atomic_ref`, we can establish a suitable relation between the two -- or do you see problems with that ``@cbeuw?`` (I recall you said there was some issue, but it was deep inside that PR and Github makes it impossible to find...)
Cc ``@thomcc;`` not sure whom else to ping for atomic memory model things.
update CPU usage script
I've made slight changes to the CPU usage plot script with updated links from the [ci2 aws instance](https://rust-lang-ci2.s3.amazonaws.com/).
This duplicates a lot of checking, and doesn't seem particularly useful -
these are already caught in review.
Note that this still keeps the license check.
This is difficult to support without submodule handling in bootstrap.py, because cargo will refuse
to vendor sources unless it knows the Cargo.toml files of all tools in tree. Moving vendor support
to rustbuild means that rustbuild will be built without vendoring.
Rather than trying to solve this, just remove support altogether and require
people to use `rustc-src` if they want vendoring (or run `cargo vendor` manually).
use `def_ident_span` , `body_owner_def_id` instead of `in_progress_typeck_results`, `guess_head_span`
use `body_id.owner` directly
add description to label
These submodules were previously updated in python because Cargo gives a hard error if toml files
are missing from the workspace:
```
error: failed to load manifest for workspace member `/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/src/tools/rls`
Caused by:
failed to read `/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/src/tools/rls/Cargo.toml`
Caused by:
No such file or directory (os error 2)
failed to run: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo build --manifest-path /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/src/bootstrap/Cargo.toml
```
However, bootstrap doesn't actually need to be part of the workspace.
Remove it so we can move submodule handling fully to Rust, avoiding duplicate code between Rust and Python.
Note that this does break `cargo run`; it has to be `cd src/bootstrap && cargo run` now.
Given that we're planning to make the main entrypoint a shell script (or rust binary),
I think this is a good tradeoff for reduced complexity in bootstrap.py.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #97867 (lub: don't bail out due to empty binders)
- #98099 (interpret: convert_tag_add_extra: allow tagger to raise errors)
- #98199 (Move some tests to more reasonable directories)
- #98334 (Add a full regression test for #73727)
- #98336 (Remove the unused-`#[doc(hidden)]` logic from the `unused_attributes` lint)
- #98344 (This comment is out dated and misleading, the arm is about TAITs)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
