Yuki Okushi
788de4701e
Rollup merge of #109923 - ElectrifyPro:visibility, r=wesleywiser
...
Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear
This updates the error message `error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.
Resolves #109822 .
2023-04-11 12:18:50 +09:00
bors
2eaeb1eee1
Auto merge of #109437 - petrochenkov:effvisopt, r=davidtwco
...
resolve: Restore some effective visibility optimizations
Something similar was previously removed as a part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104602 .
So we can see [bitmaps-3.1.0](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/tree/master/collector/compile-benchmarks/bitmaps-3.1.0 ), [match-stress](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/tree/master/collector/compile-benchmarks/match-stress ) and [unused-warnings](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/tree/master/collector/compile-benchmarks/unused-warnings ) in regressions there, and in improvements in this PR.
After this PR all table changes should also be "locally correct" after every update.
2023-04-05 20:50:33 +00:00
Tam Pham
4e5c120f33
Update ui tests involving invalid visibility qualifiers
2023-04-03 22:28:55 -05:00
jyn
01b75e20f2
Move some UI tests into subdirectories
...
to avoid going over the existing limit now that the ui-fulldeps tests have
been moved to ui.
2023-04-02 19:42:30 -04:00
Vadim Petrochenkov
60c6dc07de
resolve: Restore some effective visibility optimizations
...
Something similar was previously removed as a part of #104602 , but after this PR all table changes should also be "locally correct" after every update.
2023-03-31 17:07:59 +04:00
Vadim Petrochenkov
4695ddf510
privacy: Support #![rustc_effective_visibility] on the crate root
2023-03-28 22:11:05 +04:00
Michael Howell
3f374128ee
diagnostics: update test cases to refer to assoc fn with self as method
2023-02-22 08:40:47 -07:00
Michael Goulet
e20f6ff1dc
Tighter spans for bad inherent impl types
2023-02-13 18:41:18 +00:00
Esteban Küber
41e66d9025
review comments: Tweak output
...
* Account for `struct S(pub(super)Ty);` in suggestion
* Suggest changing field visibility in E0603 too
2023-01-11 21:36:02 +00:00
Esteban Küber
ad13d9fbbe
Suggest making private tuple struct field public
...
Fix #52144 .
2023-01-11 21:35:42 +00:00
Albert Larsan
cf2dff2b1e
Move /src/test to /tests
2023-01-11 09:32:08 +00:00
