Overhaul const-checking diagnostics
The primary purpose of this PR was to remove `NonConstOp::STOPS_CONST_CHECKING`, which causes any additional errors found by the const-checker to be silenced. I used this flag to preserve diagnostic parity with `qualify_min_const_fn.rs`, which has since been removed.
However, simply removing the flag caused a deluge of errors in some cases, since an error would be emitted any time a local or temporary had a wrong type. To remedy this, I added an alternative system (`DiagnosticImportance`) to silence additional error messages that were likely to distract the user from the underlying issue. When an error of the highest importance occurs, all less important errors are silenced. When no error of the highest importance occurs, all less important errors are emitted after checking is complete. Following the suggestions from the important error is usually enough to fix the less important errors, so this should lead to better UX most of the time.
There's also some unrelated diagnostics improvements in this PR isolated in their own commits. Splitting them out would be possible, but a bit of a pain. This isn't as tidy as some of my other PRs, but it should *only* affect diagnostics, never whether or not something passes const-checking. Note that there are a few trivial exceptions to this, like banning `Yield` in all const-contexts, not just `const fn`.
As always, meant to be reviewed commit-by-commit.
r? `@oli-obk`
This patch adds support for the LLVM cmse_nonsecure_entry attribute.
This is a target-dependent attribute that only has sense for the
thumbv8m Rust targets.
You can find more information about this attribute here:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ecm0359818/latest/
Signed-off-by: Hugues de Valon <hugues.devalon@arm.com>
Optimize `IntRange::from_pat`, then shrink `ParamEnv`
Resolves#77058.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
cc `@vandenheuvel`
Looking at the output of `perf report` for #76244, the hot instructions seemed to be around the call to `pat_constructor` in `IntRange::from_pat`. I carried out an obvious optimization, but it actually made the instruction count higher (see #77075). However, it seems to have mitigated whatever was causing the pipeline stalls, so when combined with #76244, it's a net win.
As you can see below, the regression in #76244 seems to have originated from something measured by `stalled-cycles-backend`. I'll try to collect some finer-grained stats to see if I can isolate it. I wish I had a better idea of what was going on here. I'd like to prevent the regression from reappearing in the future due to small changes in unrelated code.
<details>
<summary>Current `master`:</summary>
```
Performance counter stats for 'cargo +baseline-stage1 check':
2,275.67 msec task-clock:u # 0.998 CPUs utilized
0 context-switches:u # 0.000 K/sec
0 cpu-migrations:u # 0.000 K/sec
49,826 page-faults:u # 0.022 M/sec
5,117,221,678 cycles:u # 2.249 GHz
299,655,943 stalled-cycles-frontend:u # 5.86% frontend cycles idle
2,284,213,395 stalled-cycles-backend:u # 44.64% backend cycles idle
8,051,871,959 instructions:u # 1.57 insn per cycle
# 0.28 stalled cycles per insn
1,359,589,402 branches:u # 597.447 M/sec
7,359,347 branch-misses:u # 0.54% of all branches
2.281030026 seconds time elapsed
2.108197000 seconds user
0.164183000 seconds sys
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Shrink `ParamEnv` without changing `IntRange::from_pat`:</summary>
```
Performance counter stats for 'cargo +perf-stage1 check':
2,751.79 msec task-clock:u # 0.996 CPUs utilized
0 context-switches:u # 0.000 K/sec
0 cpu-migrations:u # 0.000 K/sec
50,103 page-faults:u # 0.018 M/sec
6,260,590,019 cycles:u # 2.275 GHz
317,355,920 stalled-cycles-frontend:u # 5.07% frontend cycles idle
3,397,743,582 stalled-cycles-backend:u # 54.27% backend cycles idle
8,276,224,367 instructions:u # 1.32 insn per cycle
# 0.41 stalled cycles per insn
1,370,453,386 branches:u # 498.023 M/sec
7,281,031 branch-misses:u # 0.53% of all branches
2.763265838 seconds time elapsed
2.544578000 seconds user
0.204548000 seconds sys
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Shrink `ParamEnv` and change `IntRange::from_pat`: </summary>
```
Performance counter stats for 'cargo +perf-stage1 check':
2,295.57 msec task-clock:u # 0.996 CPUs utilized
0 context-switches:u # 0.000 K/sec
0 cpu-migrations:u # 0.000 K/sec
49,959 page-faults:u # 0.022 M/sec
5,151,407,066 cycles:u # 2.244 GHz
324,517,829 stalled-cycles-frontend:u # 6.30% frontend cycles idle
2,301,671,001 stalled-cycles-backend:u # 44.68% backend cycles idle
8,130,868,329 instructions:u # 1.58 insn per cycle
# 0.28 stalled cycles per insn
1,356,618,512 branches:u # 590.972 M/sec
7,323,800 branch-misses:u # 0.54% of all branches
2.304509653 seconds time elapsed
2.128090000 seconds user
0.163909000 seconds sys
```
</details>
Remove `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_ptr]` and add `#![feature(const_fn_fn_ptr_basics)]`
`rustc_allow_const_fn_ptr` was a hack to work around the lack of an escape hatch for the "min `const fn`" checks in const-stable functions. Now that we have co-opted `allow_internal_unstable` for this purpose, we no longer need a bespoke attribute.
Now this functionality is gated under `const_fn_fn_ptr_basics` (how concise!), and `#[allow_internal_unstable(const_fn_fn_ptr_basics)]` replaces `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_ptr]`. `const_fn_fn_ptr_basics` allows function pointer types to appear in the arguments and locals of a `const fn` as well as function pointer casts to be performed inside a `const fn`. Both of these were allowed in constants and statics already. Notably, this does **not** allow users to invoke function pointers in a const context. Presumably, we will use a nicer name for that (`const_fn_ptr`?).
r? @oli-obk
diag: improve closure/generic parameter mismatch
Fixes#51154.
This PR improves the diagnostic when a type parameter is expected and a closure is found, noting that each closure has a distinct type and therefore could not always match the caller-chosen type of the parameter.
r? @estebank
This was a hack to work around the lack of an escape hatch for the "min
`const fn`" checks in const-stable functions. Now that we have co-opted
`allow_internal_unstable` for this purpose, we no longer need the
bespoke attribute.
Return values up to 128 bits in registers
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/26494#issuecomment-619506345 by making Rust's default ABI pass return values up to 128 bits in size in registers, just like the System V ABI.
The result is that these methods from the comment linked above now generate the same code, making the Rust ABI as efficient as the `"C"` ABI:
```rust
pub struct Stats { x: u32, y: u32, z: u32, }
pub extern "C" fn sum_c(a: &Stats, b: &Stats) -> Stats {
return Stats {x: a.x + b.x, y: a.y + b.y, z: a.z + b.z };
}
pub fn sum_rust(a: &Stats, b: &Stats) -> Stats {
return Stats {x: a.x + b.x, y: a.y + b.y, z: a.z + b.z };
}
```
```asm
sum_rust:
movl (%rsi), %eax
addl (%rdi), %eax
movl 4(%rsi), %ecx
addl 4(%rdi), %ecx
movl 8(%rsi), %edx
addl 8(%rdi), %edx
shlq $32, %rcx
orq %rcx, %rax
retq
```
Ignore ZST offsets when deciding whether to use Scalar/ScalarPair layout
This is important because Scalar/ScalarPair layout previously would not be used if any ZST had nonzero offset.
For example, before this change, only `((), u128)` would be laid out like `u128`, not `(u128, ())`.
Fixes#63244
emit errors during AbstractConst building
There changes are currently still untested, so I don't expect this to pass CI 😆
It seems to me like this is the direction we want to go in, though we didn't have too much of a discussion about this.
r? @oli-obk
use if let instead of single match arm expressions
use if let instead of single match arm expressions to compact code and reduce nesting (clippy::single_match)
Rollup of 15 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #76722 (Test and fix Send and Sync traits of BTreeMap artefacts)
- #76766 (Extract some intrinsics out of rustc_codegen_llvm)
- #76800 (Don't generate bootstrap usage unless it's needed)
- #76809 (simplfy condition in ItemLowerer::with_trait_impl_ref())
- #76815 (Fix wording in mir doc)
- #76818 (Don't compile regex at every function call.)
- #76821 (Remove redundant nightly features)
- #76823 (black_box: silence unused_mut warning when building with cfg(miri))
- #76825 (use `array_windows` instead of `windows` in the compiler)
- #76827 (fix array_windows docs)
- #76828 (use strip_prefix over starts_with and manual slicing based on pattern length (clippy::manual_strip))
- #76840 (Move to intra doc links in core/src/future)
- #76845 (Use intra docs links in core::{ascii, option, str, pattern, hash::map})
- #76853 (Use intra-doc links in library/core/src/task/wake.rs)
- #76871 (support panic=abort in Miri)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
use `array_windows` instead of `windows` in the compiler
I do think these changes are beautiful, but do have to admit that using type inference for the window length
can easily be confusing. This seems like a general issue with const generics, where inferring constants adds an additional
complexity which users have to learn and keep in mind.
Remove redundant nightly features
Removes a bunch of redundant/outdated nightly features. The first commit removes a `core_intrinsics` use for which a stable wrapper has been provided since. The second commit replaces the `const_generics` feature with `min_const_generics` which might get stabilized this year. The third commit is the result of a trial/error run of removing every single feature and then adding it back if compile failed. A bunch of unused features are the result that the third commit removes.
Validate constants during `const_eval_raw`
This PR implements the groundwork for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72396
* constants are now validated during `const_eval_raw`
* to prevent cycle errors, we do not validate references to statics anymore beyond the fact that they are not dangling
* the `const_eval` query ICEs if used on `static` items
* as a side effect promoteds are now evaluated to `ConstValue::Scalar` again (since they are just a reference to the actual promoted allocation in most cases).
shim: monomorphic `FnPtrShim`s during construction
Fixes#69925.
This PR adjusts MIR shim construction so that substitutions are applied to function pointer shims during construction, rather than during codegen (as determined by `substs_for_mir_body`).
r? `@eddyb`
assert ScalarMaybeUninit size
I noticed most low-level Miri types have such an assert but `ScalarMaybeUninit` does not, so let's add that. Good t see that the `Option`-like optimization kicks in and this is no bigger than `Scalar`. :)
r? @oli-obk
lint/ty: move fns to avoid abstraction violation
This PR moves `transparent_newtype_field` and `is_zst` to `LateContext` where they are used, rather than being on the `VariantDef` and `TyS` types, hopefully addressing @eddyb's concern [from this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74340#discussion_r456534910).
compare generic constants using `AbstractConst`s
This is a MVP of rust-lang/compiler-team#340. The changes in this PR should only be relevant if `feature(const_evaluatable_checked)` is enabled.
~~currently based on top of #76559, so blocked on that.~~
r? `@oli-obk` cc `@varkor` `@eddyb`
Issue 72408 nested closures exponential
This fixes#72408.
Nested closures were resulting in exponential compilation time.
This PR is enhancing asymptotic complexity, but also increasing the constant, so I would love to see perf run results.
Mostly to fix ui/issues/issue-37311-type-length-limit/issue-37311.rs.
Most parts of the compiler can handle deeply nested types with a lot
of duplicates just fine, but some parts still attempt to naively
traverse type tree.
Before such problems were caught by type length limit check,
but now these places will have to be changed to handle
duplicated types gracefully.
This fixes#72408.
Nested closures were resulting in exponential compilation time.
As a performance optimization this change introduces MiniSet,
which is a simple small storage optimized set.
improve const infer error
cc #72328
reduces it from
```
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
--> src/main.rs:17:5
|
17 | Foo.bar().bar().bar().bar().baz();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: unable to infer the value of a const parameter
```
to
```
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
--> $DIR/method-chain.rs:21:33
|
LL | Foo.bar().bar().bar().bar().baz();
| ^^^
|
= note: cannot infer the value of the const parameter `N`
```
r? @varkor
fix syntax error in suggesting generic constraint in trait parameter
suggest `where T: Foo` for the first bound on a trait, then suggest
`, T: Foo` when the suggested bound would add to an existing set of
`where` clauses. `where T: Foo` may be the first bound if `T` has a
default, because we'd rather suggest
```
trait A<T=()> where T: Copy
```
than
```
trait A<T: Copy=()>
```
for legibility reasons.
the test case i added here is derived from [this reproduction](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=0bf3ace9f2a183d0bdbd748c6b8e3971):
```
struct B<T: Copy> {
t: T
}
trait A<T = ()> {
fn returns_constrained_type(&self, t: T) -> B<T> {
B { t }
}
}
```
where the suggested fix,
```
trait A<T = ()>, T: Copy { ... }
```
is in fact invalid syntax!
i also found an error in the existing suggestion for `trait Base<T = String>: Super<T>` where rustc would suggest `trait Base<T = String>: Super<T>, T: Copy`, but `T: Copy` is the first of the trait's `where` clauses and should be `where T: Copy` as well. the test for that suggestion expects invalid syntax, and has been revised to a compiler-pleasing `trait Base<T = String>: Super<T> where T: Copy`.
judging by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/70009 i'll.. cc @estebank ?
Note when a a move/borrow error is caused by a deref coercion
Fixes#73268
When a deref coercion occurs, we may end up with a move error if the
base value has been partially moved out of. However, we do not indicate
anywhere that a deref coercion is occuring, resulting in an error
message with a confusing span.
This PR adds an explicit note to move errors when a deref coercion is
involved. We mention the name of the type that the deref-coercion
resolved to, as well as the `Deref::Target` associated type being used.
More structured suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait on non-coerceable tail expressions
When encountering a `match` or `if` as a tail expression where the
different arms do not have the same type *and* the return type of that
`fn` is an `impl Trait`, check whether those arms can implement `Trait`
and if so, suggest using boxed trait objects.
Use structured suggestion for `impl T` to `Box<dyn T>`.
Fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69107
This commit improves the diagnostic when a type parameter is expected
and a closure is found, noting that each closure has a distinct type and
therefore could not always match the caller-chosen type of the
parameter.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
suggest `where T: Foo` for the first bound on a trait, then suggest
`, T: Foo` when the suggested bound would add to an existing set of
`where` clauses. `where T: Foo` may be the first bound if `T` has a
default, because we'd rather suggest
```
trait A<T=()> where T: Copy
```
than
```
trait A<T: Copy=()>
```
for legibility reasons.
When encountering a `match` or `if` as a tail expression where the
different arms do not have the same type *and* the return type of that
`fn` is an `impl Trait`, check whether those arms can implement `Trait`
and if so, suggest using boxed trait objects.
Fixes#73268
When a deref coercion occurs, we may end up with a move error if the
base value has been partially moved out of. However, we do not indicate
anywhere that a deref coercion is occuring, resulting in an error
message with a confusing span.
This PR adds an explicit note to move errors when a deref coercion is
involved. We mention the name of the type that the deref-coercion
resolved to, as well as the `Deref::Target` associated type being used.
Add CONST_ITEM_MUTATION lint
Fixes#74053Fixes#55721
This PR adds a new lint `CONST_ITEM_MUTATION`.
Given an item `const FOO: SomeType = ..`, this lint fires on:
* Attempting to write directly to a field (`FOO.field = some_val`) or
array entry (`FOO.array_field[0] = val`)
* Taking a mutable reference to the `const` item (`&mut FOO`), including
through an autoderef `FOO.some_mut_self_method()`
The lint message explains that since each use of a constant creates a
new temporary, the original `const` item will not be modified.
make `ConstEvaluatable` more strict
relevant zulip discussion: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/146212-t-compiler.2Fconst-eval/topic/.60ConstEvaluatable.60.20generic.20functions/near/204125452
Let's see how much this impacts. Depending on how this goes this should probably be a future compat warning.
Short explanation: we currently forbid anonymous constants which depend on generic types, e.g. `[0; std::mem::size_of::<T>]` currently errors.
We previously checked this by evaluating the constant and returned an error if that failed. This however allows things like
```rust
const fn foo<T>() -> usize {
if std::mem::size_of::<*mut T>() < 8 { // size of *mut T does not depend on T
std::mem::size_of::<T>()
} else {
8
}
}
fn test<T>() {
let _ = [0; foo::<T>()];
}
```
which is a backwards compatibility hazard. This also has worrying interactions with mir optimizations (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74491#issuecomment-661890421) and intrinsics (#74538).
r? `@oli-obk` `@eddyb`
