make `error_reported` check for delayed bugs
Fixes#104768
`error_reported()` was only checking if there were errors emitted, not for `delay_bug`s which can also be a source of `ErrorGuaranteed`. I assume the same is true of `lint_err_count` but i dont know
`AddToDiagnostic::add_to_diagnostic_with` is similar to the previous
`AddToDiagnostic::add_to_diagnostic` but takes a function that can be
used by the caller to modify diagnostic messages originating from the
subdiagnostic (such as performing translation eagerly).
`add_to_diagnostic` now just calls `add_to_diagnostic_with` with an
empty closure.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
fix a ui test
use `into`
fix clippy ui test
fix a run-make-fulldeps test
implement `IntoQueryParam<DefId>` for `OwnerId`
use `OwnerId` for more queries
change the type of `ParentOwnerIterator::Item` to `(OwnerId, OwnerNode)`
FIX - ambiguous Diagnostic link in docs
UPDATE - rename diagnostic_items to IntoDiagnostic and AddToDiagnostic
[Gardening] FIX - formatting via `x fmt`
FIX - rebase conflicts. NOTE: Confirm wheather or not we want to handle TargetDataLayoutErrorsWrapper this way
DELETE - unneeded allow attributes in Handler method
FIX - broken test
FIX - Rebase conflict
UPDATE - rename residual _SessionDiagnostic and fix LintDiag link
add note for `layout_of` when query depth overflows
Fixes#101747
Added `try_find_layout_root` function to add a note for `layout_of` when query depth overflows. This would make the error in #101747 look like this:
```
error: queries overflow the depth limit!
|
note: Query depth increased by 66 when computing layout of `core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<core::option::Option<alloc::boxed::Box<alloc::string::String>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>`!
--> D:\rust-backup\parallel_rust\query_depth.rs:40:1
|
40 | fn main() {
| ^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
```
cc ``@semicoleon``
On later stages, the feature is already stable.
Result of running:
rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
Use HashStable_Generic in rustc_type_ir
A lot of the types in this crate implemented HashStable directly to avoid circular dependencies. One way around that is to use HashStable_Generic. We adopt that here to avoid a lot of boilerplate.
This doesn't update all the types, because some would require `I: Interner + HashStable`.
r? `@cjgillot`
A lot of the types in this crate implemented HashStable directly to
avoid circular dependencies. One way around that is to use
HashStable_Generic. We adopt that here to avoid a lot of boilerplate.
This doesn't update all the types, because some would require
`I: Interner + HashStable`.
- Add a `HandleCycleError` enum to rustc_query_system, along with a `handle_cycle_error` function
- Move `Value` to rustc_query_system, so `handle_cycle_error` can use it
- Move the `Value` impls from rustc_query_impl to rustc_middle. This is necessary due to orphan rules.
Suggested by the team in this Zulip Topic https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20SessionDiagnostic.20on.20Handler
Handler already has almost all the capabilities of ParseSess when it comes to diagnostic emission, in this migration we only needed to add the ability to access source_map from the emitter in order to get a Snippet and the start_point. Not sure if this is the best way to address this gap
