Commit Graph

8004 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nicholas Nethercote
edda2a7d3e Revert some span_bugs to span_delayed_bug.
Fixes #121503.
Fixes #121597.
2024-02-26 10:57:30 +11:00
Matthias Krüger
a4423884c1
Rollup merge of #121586 - gurry:121532-ice-unwrap-on-none, r=cjgillot
Don't use `unwrap()` in `ArrayIntoIter` lint when typeck fails

Fixes #121532
2024-02-25 17:05:23 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
4d442f5a58
Rollup merge of #121409 - compiler-errors:atb-cycle, r=cjgillot
Prevent cycle in implied predicates computation

Makes #65913 from hang -> fail. I believe fail is the correct state for this test to remain for the long term.
2024-02-25 17:05:22 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
f780824c14
Rollup merge of #121284 - notriddle:notriddle/issue-106421, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Add test cases for inlining compiler-private items

Closes #106421

This was already fixed by #121218, but now the test cases are added.
2024-02-25 17:05:21 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
c99902e2f9
Rollup merge of #120805 - RalfJung:const-pat-partial-eq, r=oli-obk
make non-PartialEq-typed consts as patterns a hard error

This lint was introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115893, for Rust 1.74, so we just had the third stable release where this is shown as a future-compat lint (which is shown for dependencies). Not a single comment or backreference showed up in the tracking issue, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116122. So this seems fairly safe to turn into a hard error.

Of course we should do a crater run first.

This is part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120362.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116122.
2024-02-25 17:05:20 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
e13f454874
Rollup merge of #119590 - ChrisDenton:cfg-target-abi, r=Nilstrieb
Stabilize `cfg_target_abi`

This stabilizes the `cfg` option called `target_abi`:

```rust
#[cfg(target_abi = "eabihf")]
```

Tracking issue: #80970

fixes #78791
resolves #80970
2024-02-25 17:05:19 +01:00
Gurinder Singh
fa7557181f Don't use unwrap() in ArrayIntoIter lint when typeck fails 2024-02-25 17:51:56 +05:30
Ralf Jung
5b7786cd1d make non-PartialEq-typed consts as patterns a hard error 2024-02-25 11:30:10 +01:00
bors
e9f9594913 Auto merge of #121114 - Nilstrieb:no-inline!, r=saethlin
Add `#[rustc_no_mir_inline]` for standard library UB checks

should help with #121110 and also with #120848

Because the MIR inliner cannot know whether the checks are enabled or not, so inlining is an unnecessary compile time pessimization when debug assertions are disabled. LLVM knows whether they are enabled or not, so it can optimize accordingly without wasting time.

r? `@saethlin`
2024-02-25 03:47:31 +00:00
bors
89d8e3116c Auto merge of #120650 - clubby789:switchint-const, r=saethlin
Use `br` instead of a conditional when switching on a constant boolean

r? `@ghost`
2024-02-25 01:27:44 +00:00
bors
2ae1bb6711 Auto merge of #121569 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-awglrax, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #121343 (Add examples for some methods on slices)
 - #121374 (match lowering: Split off `test_candidates` into several functions and improve comments)
 - #121474 (Ignore compiletest test directive migration commits)
 - #121515 (promotion: don't promote int::MIN / -1)
 - #121530 (Fix incorrect doc of ScopedJoinHandle::is_finished)
 - #121551 (Forbid use of `extern "C-unwind"` inside standard library)
 - #121556 (Use `addr_of!`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2024-02-24 23:08:21 +00:00
Michael Howell
24aa348586 Add test cases for inlining compiler-private items
Closes #106421

This was already fixed by
f5d43a052b, but now the test cases are
added.
2024-02-24 15:38:55 -07:00
Chris Denton
93ec0e6299
Stabilize cfg_target_abi 2024-02-24 17:52:03 -03:00
Nilstrieb
81d7069e34 Add #[rustc_no_mir_inline] for standard library UB checks
Co-authored-by: Ben Kimock <kimockb@gmail.com>
2024-02-24 21:19:41 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
d978a1c671
Rollup merge of #121531 - saethlin:ignore-less-debug, r=compiler-errors
Ignore less tests in debug builds

Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120594 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120863, nearly all UB-detecting debug assertions get compiled out of code that is monomorphized by a crate built with debug assertions disabled.

Which means that if we default all our codegen tests to `-Cdebug-assertions=no`, most of them work just fine against a sysroot built with debug assertions.

I also tried to explain a bit better why some tests need to be skipped, for those that still need to be skipped.
2024-02-24 15:35:14 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
b87a713b9d
Rollup merge of #121522 - RalfJung:insert-extract-boundscheck, r=oli-obk
check that simd_insert/extract indices are in-bounds

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/77477
r? `@oli-obk`
2024-02-24 15:35:14 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
b10ef3c6bc
Rollup merge of #121435 - estebank:rpitit-static-119773, r=compiler-errors
Account for RPITIT in E0310 explicit lifetime constraint suggestion

When given

```rust
trait Original {
    fn f() -> impl Fn();
}

trait Erased {
    fn f(&self) -> Box<dyn Fn()>;
}

impl<T: Original> Erased for T {
    fn f(&self) -> Box<dyn Fn()> {
        Box::new(<T as Original>::f())
    }
}
```

emit do not emit an invalid suggestion restricting the `Trait::{opaque}` type in a `where` clause:

```
error[E0310]: the associated type `<T as Original>::{opaque#0}` may not live long enough
  --> $DIR/missing-static-bound-from-impl.rs:11:9
   |
LL |         Box::new(<T as Original>::f())
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |         |
   |         the associated type `<T as Original>::{opaque#0}` must be valid for the static lifetime...
   |         ...so that the type `impl Fn()` will meet its required lifetime bounds
```

Partially address #119773. Ideally we'd suggest modifying `Erased::f` instead.

r? `@compiler-errors`
2024-02-24 15:35:12 +01:00
Ralf Jung
f32095cd8d promotion: don't promote int::MIN / -1 2024-02-24 12:17:37 +01:00
Ben Kimock
2f3c0b9859 Ignore less tests in debug builds 2024-02-23 18:04:01 -05:00
Ralf Jung
8e0dd993d6 check that simd_insert/extract indices are in-bounds 2024-02-23 19:43:59 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
06e54f8d49
Rollup merge of #121510 - RalfJung:lint-overflowing-ops, r=oli-obk
lint-overflowing-ops: unify cases and remove redundancy

Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121432
r? `@oli-obk`
2024-02-23 17:02:06 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
4d5c4e5205
Rollup merge of #121470 - clubby789:anon-struct-in-enum, r=fmease
Don't ICE on anonymous struct in enum variant

Fixes #121446

Computing `adt_def` for the anon struct calls `adt_def` on the parent to find its repr. If the parent is a non-item (e.g. an enum variant) we should have already emitted at least one error, so we just use the repr of the anonymous struct to avoid an ICE.

cc ``@frank-king``
2024-02-23 17:02:04 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
26cb6c7287
Rollup merge of #120742 - Nadrieril:use-min_exh_pats, r=compiler-errors
mark `min_exhaustive_patterns` as complete

This is step 1 and 2 of my [proposal](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119612#issuecomment-1918097361) to move `min_exhaustive_patterns` forward. The vast majority of in-tree use cases of `exhaustive_patterns` are covered by `min_exhaustive_patterns`. There are a few cases that still require `exhaustive_patterns` in tests and they're all behind references.

r? ``@ghost``
2024-02-23 17:02:03 +01:00
Ralf Jung
9a2d550050 lint-overflowing-ops: unify cases and remove redundancy 2024-02-23 15:29:33 +01:00
clubby789
35a9e73521 Don't ICE on anonymous struct in enum variant 2024-02-23 12:25:23 +00:00
clubby789
7159aed51e Use br instead of conditional when branching on constant 2024-02-23 10:52:55 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
52805b0cb4
Rollup merge of #121482 - nnethercote:fix-121455, r=oli-obk
Allow for a missing `adt_def` in `NamePrivacyVisitor`.

This was caused by 72b172bdf6 in #121206. That commit removed an early return from `analysis` when there are stashed errors. As a result, it's possible to reach privacy analysis when there are stashed errors, which means more code paths can be reached. One such code path was handled in that commit, where a `span_bug` was changed to a `span_delayed_bug`.

This commit handles another such code path uncovered by fuzzing, in much the same way.

Fixes #121455.

r? `@oli-obk`
2024-02-23 09:42:13 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
5de3a4ce0e
Rollup merge of #121480 - nnethercote:fix-more-121208-fallout, r=lcnr
Fix more #121208 fallout

#121208 converted lots of delayed bugs to bugs. Unsurprisingly, there were a few invalid conversion found via fuzzing.

r? `@lcnr`
2024-02-23 09:42:12 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
86727df4ed
Rollup merge of #121471 - estebank:lint-clone, r=TaKO8Ki
When encountering `<&T as Clone>::clone(x)` because `T: Clone`, suggest `#[derive(Clone)]`

CC #40699.

```
warning: call to `.clone()` on a reference in this situation does nothing
  --> $DIR/noop-method-call.rs:23:71
   |
LL |     let non_clone_type_ref_clone: &PlainType<u32> = non_clone_type_ref.clone();
   |                                                                       ^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: the type `PlainType<u32>` does not implement `Clone`, so calling `clone` on `&PlainType<u32>` copies the reference, which does not do anything and can be removed
help: remove this redundant call
   |
LL -     let non_clone_type_ref_clone: &PlainType<u32> = non_clone_type_ref.clone();
LL +     let non_clone_type_ref_clone: &PlainType<u32> = non_clone_type_ref;
   |
help: if you meant to clone `PlainType<u32>`, implement `Clone` for it
   |
LL + #[derive(Clone)]
LL | struct PlainType<T>(T);
   |
```
2024-02-23 09:42:11 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
6e00f0d189
Rollup merge of #121434 - nnethercote:fix-121208-fallout, r=lcnr
Fix #121208 fallout

#121208 converted lots of delayed bugs to bugs. Unsurprisingly, there were a few invalid conversion found via fuzzing.

r? `@lcnr`
2024-02-23 09:42:10 +01:00
bors
dda102c190 Auto merge of #121432 - mj10021:issue-119851-fix, r=nnethercote
Move as many tests from tests/ui/numbers-arithmetic to tests/ui/lint as possible

Fixes #119851 , and also consolidates as many individual tests as possible from numbers-arithmetic.  I might have moved the tests in too aggressively, so let me know
2024-02-23 05:42:20 +00:00
bors
a28d221a4b Auto merge of #120730 - estebank:confusable-api, r=oli-obk
Provide suggestions through `rustc_confusables` annotations

Help with common API confusion, like asking for `push` when the data structure really has `append`.

```
error[E0599]: no method named `size` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
  --> $DIR/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs:17:7
   |
LL |     x.size();
   |       ^^^^
   |
help: you might have meant to use `len`
   |
LL |     x.len();
   |       ~~~
help: there is a method with a similar name
   |
LL |     x.resize();
   |       ~~~~~~
```

Fix #59450 (we can open subsequent tickets for specific cases).

Fix #108437:

```
error[E0599]: `Option<{integer}>` is not an iterator
   --> f101.rs:3:9
    |
3   |     opt.flat_map(|val| Some(val));
    |         ^^^^^^^^ `Option<{integer}>` is not an iterator
    |
   ::: /home/gh-estebank/rust/library/core/src/option.rs:571:1
    |
571 | pub enum Option<T> {
    | ------------------ doesn't satisfy `Option<{integer}>: Iterator`
    |
    = note: the following trait bounds were not satisfied:
            `Option<{integer}>: Iterator`
            which is required by `&mut Option<{integer}>: Iterator`
help: you might have meant to use `and_then`
    |
3   |     opt.and_then(|val| Some(val));
    |         ~~~~~~~~
```

On type error of method call arguments, look at confusables for suggestion. Fix #87212:

```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
    --> f101.rs:8:18
     |
8    |     stuff.append(Thing);
     |           ------ ^^^^^ expected `&mut Vec<Thing>`, found `Thing`
     |           |
     |           arguments to this method are incorrect
     |
     = note: expected mutable reference `&mut Vec<Thing>`
                           found struct `Thing`
note: method defined here
    --> /home/gh-estebank/rust/library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs:2025:12
     |
2025 |     pub fn append(&mut self, other: &mut Self) {
     |            ^^^^^^
help: you might have meant to use `push`
     |
8    |     stuff.push(Thing);
     |           ~~~~
```
2024-02-23 00:42:56 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
21bb1a4359 Allow for a missing adt_def in NamePrivacyVisitor.
This was caused by 72b172bdf6 in #121206. That commit removed an early
return from `analysis` when there are stashed errors. As a result, it's
possible to reach privacy analysis when there are stashed errors, which
means more code paths can be reached. One such code path was handled in
that commit, where a `span_bug` was changed to a `span_delayed_bug`.

This commit handles another such code path uncovered by fuzzing, in much
the same way.

Fixes #121455.
2024-02-23 10:57:11 +11:00
Nicholas Nethercote
109321ac47 Revert some span_bugs to span_delayed_bug.
Fixes #121445.
Fixes #121457.
2024-02-23 10:04:32 +11:00
Nicholas Nethercote
4f83e50f98 Revert some span_bugs to span_delayed_bug.
Fixes #121410.
Fixes #121414.
Fixes #121418.
Fixes #121431.
2024-02-23 08:35:18 +11:00
bors
397937d812 Auto merge of #119989 - lcnr:sub_relations-bye-bye, r=compiler-errors
remove `sub_relations` from the `InferCtxt`

While doing so, I tried to remove the `delay_span_bug` in `rematch_impl` again, which lead me to discover another `freshen` bug, fixing that one in the second commit. See commit descriptions for the reasoning behind each change.

r? `@compiler-errors`
2024-02-22 20:45:24 +00:00
Esteban Küber
5e6da720f6 Account for RPITIT in E0310 explicit lifetime constraint suggestion
When given

```rust
trait Original {
    fn f() -> impl Fn();
}

trait Erased {
    fn f(&self) -> Box<dyn Fn()>;
}

impl<T: Original> Erased for T {
    fn f(&self) -> Box<dyn Fn()> {
        Box::new(<T as Original>::f())
    }
}
```

avoid suggestion to restrict the `Trait::{opaque}` type in a `where` clause:

```
error[E0310]: the associated type `<T as Original>::{opaque#0}` may not live long enough
  --> $DIR/missing-static-bound-from-impl.rs:11:9
   |
LL |         Box::new(<T as Original>::f())
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |         |
   |         the associated type `<T as Original>::{opaque#0}` must be valid for the static lifetime...
   |         ...so that the type `impl Fn()` will meet its required lifetime bounds
```

CC #119773.
2024-02-22 18:56:07 +00:00
bors
d9ae43c787 Auto merge of #121469 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-oaoxuo2, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #120598 (No need to `validate_alias_bound_self_from_param_env` in `assemble_alias_bound_candidates`)
 - #121386 (test that we do not support higher-ranked regions in opaque type inference)
 - #121393 (match lowering: Introduce a `TestCase` enum to replace most matching on `PatKind`)
 - #121401 (Fix typo in serialized.rs)
 - #121427 (Fix panic when compiling `Rocket`.)
 - #121439 (Fix typo in metadata.rs doc comment)
 - #121441 (`DefId`  to `LocalDefId`)
 - #121452 (Add new maintainers to nto-qnx.md)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2024-02-22 18:39:34 +00:00
Esteban Küber
91d0b371ef Fix rebase 2024-02-22 18:38:10 +00:00
Esteban Küber
fdaaaa1951 fix test 2024-02-22 18:05:28 +00:00
Esteban Küber
28c028737d Deduplicate some logic and reword output 2024-02-22 18:05:28 +00:00
Esteban Küber
caa216d245 Tweak wording of "implemented trait isn't imported" suggestion 2024-02-22 18:05:27 +00:00
Esteban Küber
14277ef201 Better account for associated const found for fn call expr 2024-02-22 18:04:55 +00:00
Esteban Küber
76885673d6 fix test 2024-02-22 18:04:55 +00:00
Esteban Küber
e1e4da2b0a Make confusable suggestions verbose 2024-02-22 18:04:55 +00:00
Esteban Küber
385eea1d46 Consider methods from traits when suggesting typos
Do not provide a structured suggestion when the arguments don't match.

```
error[E0599]: no method named `test_mut` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
  --> $DIR/auto-ref-slice-plus-ref.rs:7:7
   |
LL |     a.test_mut();
   |       ^^^^^^^^
   |
   = help: items from traits can only be used if the trait is implemented and in scope
note: `MyIter` defines an item `test_mut`, perhaps you need to implement it
  --> $DIR/auto-ref-slice-plus-ref.rs:14:1
   |
LL | trait MyIter {
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: there is a method `get_mut` with a similar name, but with different arguments
  --> $SRC_DIR/core/src/slice/mod.rs:LL:COL
```

Consider methods beyond inherent ones when suggesting typos.

```
error[E0599]: no method named `owned` found for reference `&dyn Foo` in the current scope
  --> $DIR/object-pointer-types.rs:11:7
   |
LL |     fn owned(self: Box<Self>);
   |                    --------- the method might not be found because of this arbitrary self type
...
LL |     x.owned();
   |       ^^^^^ help: there is a method with a similar name: `to_owned`
```

Fix #101013.
2024-02-22 18:04:55 +00:00
Esteban Küber
d30dfb0af7 Provide more and more accurate suggestions when calling the wrong method
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
  --> $DIR/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs:20:14
   |
LL |     x.append(42);
   |       ------ ^^ expected `&mut Vec<{integer}>`, found integer
   |       |
   |       arguments to this method are incorrect
   |
   = note: expected mutable reference `&mut Vec<{integer}>`
                           found type `{integer}`
note: method defined here
  --> $SRC_DIR/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: you might have meant to use `push`
   |
LL |     x.push(42);
   |       ~~~~
```
2024-02-22 18:04:55 +00:00
Esteban Küber
0e89465672 On type error of method call arguments, look at confusables for suggestion 2024-02-22 18:04:55 +00:00
Esteban Küber
e5b3c7ef14 Add rustc_confusables annotations to some stdlib APIs
Help with common API confusion, like asking for `push` when the data structure really has `append`.

```
error[E0599]: no method named `size` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
  --> $DIR/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs:17:7
   |
LL |     x.size();
   |       ^^^^
   |
help: you might have meant to use `len`
   |
LL |     x.len();
   |       ~~~
help: there is a method with a similar name
   |
LL |     x.resize();
   |       ~~~~~~
```

#59450
2024-02-22 18:04:55 +00:00
Esteban Küber
6017de46f7 When encountering <&T as Clone>::clone(x) because T: Clone, suggest #[derive(Clone)]
CC #40699.
2024-02-22 18:01:20 +00:00