Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #131200 (Handle `rustc_query_system` cases of `rustc::potential_query_instability` lint)
- #141244 (windows: document that we rely on an undocumented property of GetUserProfileDirectoryW)
- #141247 (skip compiler tools sanity checks on certain commands)
- #141248 (fix data race in ReentrantLock fallback for targets without 64bit atomics)
- #141249 (introduce common macro for `MutVisitor` and `Visitor` to dedup code)
- #141253 (Warning added when dependency crate has async drop types, and the feature is disabled)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Warning added when dependency crate has async drop types, and the feature is disabled
In continue of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141031.
When dependency crate has non-empty `adt_async_destructor` table in metadata, and `async_drop` feature is disabled for local crate, warning will be emitted.
Test `dependency-dropped` has two revisions - with and without feature enabled. With feature enabled, async drop for dropee is executed ("Async drop" printed). Without the feature enabled, sync drop is executed ("Sync drop" printed) and warning is emitted.
Warning example:
```
warning: found async drop types in dependecy `async_drop_dep`, but async_drop feature is disabled for `dependency_dropped`
--> $DIR/dependency-dropped.rs:7:1
|
LL | #![cfg_attr(with_feature, feature(async_drop))]
| ^
|
= help: if async drop type will be dropped in a crate without `feature(async_drop)`, sync Drop will be used
```
introduce common macro for `MutVisitor` and `Visitor` to dedup code
helps with #127615.
I can do everything in one go but I figured it might be worth it to open a PR first for vibeck.
r? oli-obk
dladdr cannot leave dli_fname to be null
There are two places in the repo calling `dladdr`, and they are inconsistent wrt their assumption of whether the `dli_fname` field can be null. Let's make them consistent. I see nothing in the docs that allows it to be null, but just to be on the safe side let's make this an assertion so hopefully we get a report if that ever happens.
coverage: Detect unused local file IDs to avoid an LLVM assertion
Each function's coverage metadata contains a *local file table* that maps local file IDs (used by the function's mapping regions) to global file IDs (shared by all functions in the same CGU).
LLVM requires all local file IDs to have at least one mapping region, and has an assertion that will fail if it detects a local file ID with no regions. To make sure that assertion doesn't fire, we need to detect and skip functions whose metadata would trigger it.
(This can't actually happen yet, because currently all of a function's spans must belong to the same file and expansion. But this will be an important edge case when adding expansion region support.)
make `rustc_attr_parsing` less dominant in the rustc crate graph
It has/had a glob re-export of `rustc_attr_data_structures`, which is a crate much lower in the graph, and a lot of crates were using it *just* (or *mostly*) for that re-export, while they can rely on `rustc_attr_data_structures` directly.
Previous graph:
Graph with this PR:
The first commit keeps the re-export, and just changes the dependency if possible. The second commit is the "breaking change" which removes the re-export, and "explicitly" adds the `rustc_attr_data_structures` dependency where needed. It also switches over some src/tools/*.
The second commit is actually a lot more involved than I expected. Please let me know if it's a better idea to back it out and just keep the first commit.
fix autodiff macro on generic functions
heloo there!
This short PR allows applying the `autodiff` macro to generic functions like this one.
It only touches the frontend part, since the `rustc_autodiff` macro can already handle generics.
```rust
#[autodiff(d_square, Reverse, Duplicated, Active)]
fn square<T: std::ops::Mul<Output = T> + Copy>(x: &T) -> T {
*x * *x
}
```
Thanks to Manuel for creating an issue on this. For more information on this see #140032
r? `@ZuseZ4`
As always: thanks for any piece of feedback!!
Fixes: #140032
Tracking issue for autodiff: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124509
gvn: avoid creating overlapping assignments
Quick fix#141038, as I couldn't find a way to avoid in-place modification. I'm considering handling all `ravlue` modifications within the `visit_statement` function.
r? mir-opt
bump windows crate for compiler,bootstrap and tools
This dedupes crate versions. For `x86_64-pc-windows-msvc` stage1 cuts few kb from `rustc_driver.dll`, nice.
Return value of coroutine_layout fn changed to Result with LayoutError
Continue of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140902:
`coroutine_layout` fn is now returns `Result` with `LayoutError` to have consistent error with `layout_of_uncached`.
`async_drop_coroutine_layout` fn is now return `LayoutError::TooGeneric` in case of not-fully-specialized `async_drop_in_place<T>::{closure}` coroutine.
name resolution for guard patterns
This PR provides an initial implementation of name resolution for guard patterns [(RFC 3637)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3637-guard-patterns.md). This does not change the requirement that the bindings on either side of an or-pattern must be the same [(proposal here)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3637-guard-patterns.md#allowing-mismatching-bindings-when-possible); the code that handles that is separate from what this PR touches, so I'm saving it for a follow-up.
On a technical level, this separates "collecting the bindings in a pattern" (which was already done for or-patterns) from "introducing those bindings into scope". I believe the approach used here can be extended straightforwardly in the future to work with `if let` guard patterns, but I haven't tried it myself since we don't allow those yet.
Tracking issue for guard patterns: #129967
cc ``@Nadrieril``
split `asm!` parsing and validation
This PR splits `asm!` parsing and validation into two separate steps.
The parser constructs a `Vec<RawAsmArg>`, with each element corresponding to an argument to one of the `asm!` macros.
The validation then checks things like ordering of arguments or that options are not provided twice.
The motivation is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140279, which wants to add `#[cfg(...)]` support to these arguments. This support can now be added in a straightforward way by adding an `attributes: ast::AttrVec` field to `RawAsmArg`.
An extra reason for this split is that `rustfmt` probably wants to format the assembly at some point (currently that appears to be stubbed out, and the formatting is unstable https://github.com/rust-lang/style-team/issues/152).
r? ``@ghost`` (just want to look at CI for now)
cc ``@ytmimi`` we discussed asm formatting a little while ago in https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/6526. Am I correct in assuming that `AsmArgs` does not give enough information for formatting, but that `RawAsmArgs` would (it e.g. does not join information from multiple lines). This must have been an issue before?
try-job: aarch64-apple
Stabilize the avx512 target features
This PR stabilizes the AVX512 target features - see [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111137#issuecomment-2745821279).
Tracking Issue - #44839
The target feature UI tests have been changed to `x87` (chosen because this is very unlikely to stablize ever, please comment if some other feature will be better)
related: #111137
[win][arm64] Remove 'Arm64 Hazard' undocumented MSVC option and instead disable problematic test
PR #140758 added the undocumented `/arm64hazardfree` MSVC linker flag to work around a test failure where LLVM generated code that would trip a hazard in an outdated ARM processor.
Adding this flag caused issues with LLD, as it doesn't recognize it.
Rethinking the issue, using the undocumented flag seems like the incorrect solution: there's no guarantee that the flag won't be removed in the future, or change its meaning.
Instead, I've disabled the problematic test for Arm64 Windows and have filed a bug with the MSVC team to have the check removed: <https://developercommunity.microsoft.com/t/Remove-checking-for-and-fixing-Cortex-A/10905134>
This PR supersedes #140977
r? ```@jieyouxu```
Remove #![feature(let_chains)] from library and src/librustdoc
PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132833 has stabilized the `let_chains` feature. This PR removes the last occurences from the library, the compiler, and librustdoc (also because #140887 missed the conditional in one of the crates as it was behind the "rustc" feature).
We keep `core` as exercise for the future as updating it is non-trivial (see PR thread).
Fast path for `register_region_obligation`
If a type has no params, infer, placeholder, or non-`'static` free regions, then we can skip registering outlives obligations since the type has no components which affect lifetime checking in an interesting way.
move expensive layout sanity check to debug assertions
It is [hard to fix](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141006#issuecomment-2883415000) the slowness in the uninhabitedness computation for very big types but we can fix the very specific case of them being called during the layout sanity checks, as described in #140944.
So this PR moves this uninhabitedness check to the other expensive layout sanity checks that are ran under `debug_assertions`.
It makes building the `lemmy_api_routes` crate's self-profile `layout_of` query go from
```
+--------------------------------------------------------+-----------+-----------------+----------+------------+---------------------------------+
| Item | Self time | % of total time | Time | Item count | Incremental result hashing time |
+--------------------------------------------------------+-----------+-----------------+----------+------------+---------------------------------+
| layout_of | 63.02s | 41.895 | 244.26s | 123703 | 50.30ms |
+--------------------------------------------------------+-----------+-----------------+----------+------------+---------------------------------+
```
on master (2m17s total), to
```
| layout_of | 330.21ms | 0.372 | 26.90s | 123703 | 53.19ms |
```
with this PR (1m15s total).
(Note that the [perf run results](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141039#issuecomment-2884688756) below look a bit better than [an earlier run](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=4eca99a18eab3d4e28ed1ce3ee620d442955a470&end=c4a00993f8ee02c7565e7be652608817ea2fb97d&stat=instructions:u) I did in another PR. There may be some positive noise there, or post-merge results could differ a bit)
Since we discussed this today, r? `@compiler-errors` — and cc `@lcnr` and `@RalfJung.`
Merge mir query analysis invocations
r? `@ghost`
same thing as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140854 just a different set of queries
Doing this in general has some bad cache coherence issues because the query caches are laid out in Vec<QueryResult> lists per query where each index refers to a DefId in the same order as we're iterating. Iterating two or more lists at the same time does have cache issues, so I want to poke a bit at it to see if we can't merge just a few of them at a time.
check coroutines with `TypingMode::Borrowck` to avoid cyclic reasoning
MIR borrowck taints its output if an obligation fails. This could then cause `check_coroutine_obligations` to silence its error, causing us to not emit and actual error and ICE.
Fixes the ICE in https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/199. It is unfortunately still a regression.
r? compiler-errors
turn lld warning on old gccs into info log
As discussed in #140964 and IRL, this PR switches the spammy warning shown unconditionally when an old gcc doesn't support `-fuse-ld=lld` and we retry linking without it, to an info debug log so we don't lose it.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Fixes#140964
MIR borrowck taints its output if an obligation fails. This could then cause
`check_coroutine_obligations` to silence its error, causing us to not emit
and actual error and ICE.
