Add `impl Div<NonZeroU{0}> for u{0}` which cannot panic
Dividing an unsigned int by a `NonZeroUxx` requires a user to write (for example, in [this SO question](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64855738/how-to-inform-the-optimizer-that-nonzerou32get-will-never-return-zero)):
```
pub fn safe_div(x: u32, y: std::num::NonZeroU32) -> u32 {
x / y.get()
}
```
which generates a panicking-checked-div [assembly](https://godbolt.org/#g:!((g:!((g:!((h:codeEditor,i:(fontScale:14,j:1,lang:rust,selection:(endColumn:2,endLineNumber:6,positionColumn:2,positionLineNumber:6,selectionStartColumn:2,selectionStartLineNumber:6,startColumn:2,startLineNumber:6),source:%27pub+fn+div(x:+u32,+y:+u32)+-%3E+u32+%7B%0A++++x+/+y%0A%7D%0Apub+fn+safe_div(x:+u32,+y:+std::num::NonZeroU32)+-%3E+u32+%7B%0A++++x+/+y.get()+//+an+unchecked+division+expected%0A%7D%27),l:%275%27,n:%270%27,o:%27Rust+source+%231%27,t:%270%27)),k:50,l:%274%27,n:%270%27,o:%27%27,s:0,t:%270%27),(g:!((h:compiler,i:(compiler:r1470,filters:(b:%270%27,binary:%271%27,commentOnly:%270%27,demangle:%270%27,directives:%270%27,execute:%271%27,intel:%270%27,libraryCode:%271%27,trim:%271%27),fontScale:14,j:1,lang:rust,libs:!(),options:%27-O%27,selection:(endColumn:1,endLineNumber:1,positionColumn:1,positionLineNumber:1,selectionStartColumn:1,selectionStartLineNumber:1,startColumn:1,startLineNumber:1),source:1),l:%275%27,n:%270%27,o:%27rustc+1.47.0+(Editor+%231,+Compiler+%231)+Rust%27,t:%270%27)),k:50,l:%274%27,n:%270%27,o:%27%27,s:0,t:%270%27)),l:%272%27,n:%270%27,o:%27%27,t:%270%27)),version:4).
Avoiding the `panic` currently requires `unsafe` code.
This PR adds an `impl Div<NonZeroU{0}> for u{0}` (and `impl Rem<NonZeroU{0}> for u{0}`) which calls the `unchecked_div` (and `unchecked_rem`) intrinsic without any additional checks,
making the following code compile:
```
pub fn safe_div(x: u32, y: std::num::NonZeroU32) -> u32 {
x / y
}
pub fn safe_rem(x: u32, y: std::num::NonZeroU32) -> u32 {
x % y
}
```
The doc is set to match the regular div impl [docs](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/src/core/ops/arith.rs.html#460).
I've marked these as stable because (as I understand it) trait impls are automatically stable. I'm happy to change it to unstable if needed.
Following `@dtolnay` template from a similar issue:
this adds the following **stable** impls, which rely on dividing unsigned integers by nonzero integers being well defined and previously would have involved unsafe code to encode that knowledge:
```
impl Div<NonZeroU8> for u8 {
type Output = u8;
}
impl Rem<NonZeroU8> for u8 {
type Output = u8;
}
```
and equivalent for u16, u32, u64, u128, usize, but **not** for i8, i16, i32, i64, i128, isize (since -1/MIN is undefined).
r? `@dtolnay`
Part of #68490.
Care has been taken to leave the old consts where appropriate, for testing backcompat regressions, module shadowing, etc. The intrinsics docs were accidentally referring to some methods on f64 as std::f64, which I changed due to being contrary with how we normally disambiguate the shadow module from the primitive. In one other place I changed std::u8 to std::ops since it was just testing path handling in macros.
For places which have legitimate uses of the old consts, deprecated attributes have been optimistically inserted. Although currently unnecessary, they exist to emphasize to any future deprecation effort the necessity of these specific symbols and prevent them from being accidentally removed.
Add lint for panic!("{}")
This adds a lint that warns about `panic!("{}")`.
`panic!(msg)` invocations with a single argument use their argument as panic payload literally, without using it as a format string. The same holds for `assert!(expr, msg)`.
This lints checks if `msg` is a string literal (after expansion), and warns in case it contained braces. It suggests to insert `"{}", ` to use the message literally, or to add arguments to use it as a format string.
This lint is also a good starting point for adding warnings about `panic!(not_a_string)` later, once [`panic_any()`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74622) becomes a stable alternative.
add trailing_zeros and leading_zeros to non zero types
as a way towards being able to use the optimized intrinsics ctlz_nonzero and cttz_nonzero from stable.
have not crated any tracking issue if this is not a solution that is wanted
Test structural matching for all range types
As of #70166 all range types (`core::ops::Range` etc.) can be structurally matched upon, and by extension used in const generics. In reference to the fact that this is a publicly observable property of these types, and thus falls under the Rust stability guarantees of the standard library, a regression test was added in #70283.
This regression test was implemented by me by testing for the ability to use the range types within const generics, but that is not the actual property the std guarantees now (const generics is still unstable). This PR addresses that situation by adding extra tests for the range types that directly test whether they can be structurally matched upon.
Note: also adds the otherwise unrelated test `test_range_to_inclusive` for completeness with the other range unit tests
Duration::zero() -> Duration::ZERO
In review for #72790, whether or not a constant or a function should be favored for `#![feature(duration_zero)]` was seen as an open question. In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73544#issuecomment-691701670 an invitation was opened to either stabilize the methods or propose a switch to the constant value, supplemented with reasoning. Followup comments suggested community preference leans towards the const ZERO, which would be reason enough.
ZERO also "makes sense" beside existing associated consts for Duration. It is ever so slightly awkward to have a series of constants specifying 1 of various units but leave 0 as a method, especially when they are side-by-side in code. It seems unintuitive for the one non-dynamic value (that isn't from Default) to be not-a-const, which could hurt discoverability of the associated constants overall. Elsewhere in `std`, methods for obtaining a constant value were even deprecated, as seen with [std::u32::min_value](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.u32.html#method.min_value).
Most importantly, ZERO costs less to use. A match supports a const pattern, but const fn can only be used if evaluated through a const context such as an inline `const { const_fn() }` or a `const NAME: T = const_fn()` declaration elsewhere. Likewise, while https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73544#issuecomment-691949373 notes `Duration::zero()` can optimize to a constant value, "can" is not "will". Only const contexts have a strong promise of such. Even without that in mind, the comment in question still leans in favor of the constant for simplicity. As it costs less for a developer to use, may cost less to optimize, and seems to have more of a community consensus for it, the associated const seems best.
r? ```@LukasKalbertodt```
Refactor IntErrorKind to avoid "underflow" terminology
This PR is a continuation of #76455
# Changes
- `Overflow` renamed to `PosOverflow` and `Underflow` renamed to `NegOverflow` after discussion in #76455
- Changed some of the parsing code to return `InvalidDigit` rather than `Empty` for strings "+" and "-". https://users.rust-lang.org/t/misleading-error-in-str-parse-for-int-types/49178
- Carry the problem `char` with the `InvalidDigit` variant.
- Necessary changes were made to the compiler as it depends on `int_error_matching`.
- Redid tests to match on specific errors.
r? ```@KodrAus```
Stabilize `Poll::is_ready` and `is_pending` as const
Insta-stabilize the methods `is_ready` and `is_pending` of `std::task::Poll` as const, in the same way as [PR#76198](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76198).
Possible because of the recent stabilization of const control flow.
Part of #76225.
Duration::ZERO composes better with match and various other things,
at the cost of an occasional parens, and results in less work for the
optimizer, so let's use that instead.
This expands time's test suite to use more and in more places the
range of methods and constants added to Duration in recent
proposals for the sake of testing more API surface area and
improving legibility.
Replace absolute paths with relative ones
Modern compilers allow reaching external crates
like std or core via relative paths in modules
outside of lib.rs and main.rs.
This stabilizes the functionality in slice_partition_at_index,
but under the names `select_nth_unstable*`. The functions
`partition_at_index*` are left as deprecated, to be removed in
a later release.
Closes#55300
Implement advance_by, advance_back_by for iter::Chain
Part of #77404.
This PR does two things:
- implement `Chain::advance[_back]_by` in terms of `advance[_back]_by` on `self.a` and `advance[_back]_by` on `self.b`
- change `Chain::nth[_back]` to use `advance[_back]_by` on `self.a` and `nth[_back]` on `self.b`
This ensures that `Chain::nth` can take advantage of an efficient `nth` implementation on the second iterator, in case it doesn't implement `advance_by`.
cc `@scottmcm` in case you want to review this
Add Iterator::advance_by and DoubleEndedIterator::advance_back_by
This PR adds the iterator method
```rust
fn advance_by(&mut self, n: usize) -> Result<(), usize>
```
that advances the iterator by `n` elements, returning `Ok(())` if this succeeds or `Err(len)` if the length of the iterator was less than `n`.
Currently `Iterator::nth` is the method to override for efficiently advancing an iterator by multiple elements at once. `advance_by` is superior for this purpose because
- it's simpler to implement: instead of advancing the iterator and producing the next element you only need to advance the iterator
- it composes better: iterators like `Chain` and `FlatMap` can implement `advance_by` in terms of `advance_by` on their inner iterators, but they cannot implement `nth` in terms of `nth` on their inner iterators (see #60395)
- the default implementation of `nth` can trivially be implemented in terms of `advance_by` and `next`, which this PR also does
This PR also adds `DoubleEndedIterator::advance_back_by` for all the same reasons.
I'll make a tracking issue if it's decided this is worth merging. Also let me know if anything can be improved, this went through several iterations so there might very well still be room for improvement (especially in the doc comments). I've written overrides of these methods for most iterators that already override `nth`/`nth_back`, but those still need tests so I'll add them in a later PR.
cc @cuviper @scottmcm @Amanieu
UI to unit test for those using Cell/RefCell/UnsafeCell
Helps with #76268.
I'm working on all files using `Cell` and moving them to unit tests when possible.
r? @matklad
Make some methods of `Pin` unstable const
Make the following methods unstable const under the `const_pin` feature:
- `new`
- `new_unchecked`
- `into_inner`
- `into_inner_unchecked`
- `get_ref`
- `into_ref`
- `get_mut`
- `get_unchecked_mut`
Of these, `into_inner` and `into_inner_unchecked` require the unstable `const_precise_live_drops`.
Also adds tests for these methods in a const context.
Tracking issue: #76654
r? @ecstatic-morse
Stabilize some Result methods as const
Stabilize the following methods of Result as const:
- `is_ok`
- `is_err`
- `as_ref`
A test is also included, analogous to the test for `const_option`.
These methods are currently const under the unstable feature `const_result` (tracking issue: #67520).
I believe these methods to be eligible for stabilization because of the stabilization of #49146 (Allow if and match in constants) and the trivial implementations, see also: [PR#75463](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75463) and [PR#76135](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76135).
Note: these methods are the only methods currently under the `const_result` feature, thus this PR results in the removal of the feature.
Related: #76225
Add array_windows fn
This mimicks the functionality added by array_chunks, and implements a const-generic form of
`windows`. It makes egregious use of `unsafe`, but by necessity because the array must be
re-interpreted as a slice of arrays, and unlike array_chunks this cannot be done by casting the
original array once, since each time the index is advanced it needs to move one element, not
`N`.
I'm planning on adding more tests, but this should be good enough as a premise for the functionality.
Notably: should there be more functions overwritten for the iterator implementation/in general?
~~I've marked the issue as #74985 as there is no corresponding exact issue for `array_windows`, but it's based of off `array_chunks`.~~
Edit: See Issue #75027 created by @lcnr for tracking issue
~~Do not merge until I add more tests, please.~~
r? @lcnr
Updated issue to #75027
Update to rm oob access
And hopefully fix docs as well
Fixed naming conflict in test
Fix test which used 1-indexing
Nth starts from 0, woops
Fix a bunch of off by 1 errors
See https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=757b311987e3fae1ca47122969acda5a
Add even more off by 1 errors
And also write `next` and `next_back` in terms of `nth` and `nth_back`.
Run fmt
Fix forgetting to change fn name in test
add nth_back test & document unsafe
Remove as_ref().unwrap()
Documented occurrences of unsafe, noting what invariants are maintained
Make all methods of `Duration` unstably const
Make the following methods of `Duration` unstable const under `duration_const_2`:
- `from_secs_f64`
- `from_secs_f32`
- `mul_f64`
- `mul_f32`
- `div_f64`
- `div_f32`
This results in all methods of `Duration` being (unstable) const.
Moved the tests to `library` as part of #76268.
Possible because of #72449, which made the relevant `f32` and `f64` methods const.
Tracking issue: #72440
r? @ecstatic-morse
Make some Ordering methods const
Resubmission of [PR#75463](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75463) as per [PR#76172](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76172).
Constify the following methods of `core::cmp::Ordering`:
- `reverse`
- `then`
Insta-stabilizes these methods as const under the `const_ordering` feature, as their implementation is a trivial match and the recent stabilization of #49146 (Allow `if` and `match` in constants).
Note: the `const_ordering` feature has never actually been used as these methods have not been `#[rustc_const_unstable]`.
Tracking issue: #76113
Make the following methods unstable const under the `const_pin` feature:
- `new`
- `new_unchecked`
- `into_inner`
- `into_inner_unchecked`
- `get_ref`
- `into_ref`
Also adds tests for these methods in a const context.
Tracking issue: #76654
Make the following methods of `Duration` unstable const under `duration_const_2`:
- `from_secs_f64`
- `from_secs_f32`
- `mul_f64`
- `mul_f32`
- `div_f64`
- `div_f32`
This results in all methods of `Duration` being (unstable) const.
Also adds tests for these methods in a const context, moved the test to `library` as part of #76268.
Possible because of #72449, which made the relevant `f32` and `f64` methods const.
Tracking issue: #72440
Add saturating methods for `Duration`
In some project, I needed a `saturating_add` method for `Duration`. I implemented it myself but i thought it would be a nice addition to the standard library as it matches closely with the integers types.
3 new methods have been introduced and are gated by the new `duration_saturating_ops` unstable feature:
* `Duration::saturating_add`
* `Duration::saturating_sub`
* `Duration::saturating_mul`
If have left the tracking issue to `none` for now as I want first to understand if those methods would be acceptable at all. If agreed, I'll update the PR with the tracking issue.
Further more, to match the behavior of integers types, I introduced 2 associated constants:
* `Duration::MIN`: this one is somehow a duplicate from `Duration::zero()` method, but at the time this method was added, `MIN` was rejected as it was considered a different semantic (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72790#issuecomment-636511743).
* `Duration::MAX`
Both have been gated by the already existing unstable feature `duration_constants`, I can introduce a new unstable feature if needed or just re-use the `duration_saturating_ops`.
We might have to decide whether:
* `MIN` should be replaced by `ZERO`?
* associated constants over methods?
Add `slice::array_chunks_mut`
This follows `array_chunks` from #74373 with a mutable version, `array_chunks_mut`. The implementation is identical apart from mutability. The new tests are adaptations of the `chunks_exact_mut` tests, plus an inference test like the one for `array_chunks`.
I reused the unstable feature `array_chunks` and tracking issue #74985, but I can separate that if desired.
r? `@withoutboats`
cc `@lcnr`
Move various ui const tests to `library`
Move:
- `src\test\ui\consts\const-nonzero.rs` to `library\core`
- `src\test\ui\consts\ascii.rs` to `library\core`
- `src\test\ui\consts\cow-is-borrowed` to `library\alloc`
Part of #76268
r? @matklad
Move:
- `src\test\ui\consts\const-nonzero.rs` to `library\core`
- `src\test\ui\consts\ascii.rs` to `library\core`
- `src\test\ui\consts\cow-is-borrowed` to `library\alloc`
Part of #76268
Add `[T; N]::as_[mut_]slice`
Part of me trying to populate arrays with a couple of basic useful methods, like slices already have. The ability to add methods to arrays were added in #75212. Tracking issue: #76118
This adds:
```rust
impl<T, const N: usize> [T; N] {
pub fn as_slice(&self) -> &[T];
pub fn as_mut_slice(&mut self) -> &mut [T];
}
```
These methods are like the ones on `std::array::FixedSizeArray` and in the crate `arraytools`.
