Lazy type-alias-impl-trait
Previously opaque types were processed by
1. replacing all mentions of them with inference variables
2. memorizing these inference variables in a side-table
3. at the end of typeck, resolve the inference variables in the side table and use the resolved type as the hidden type of the opaque type
This worked okayish for `impl Trait` in return position, but required lots of roundabout type inference hacks and processing.
This PR instead stops this process of replacing opaque types with inference variables, and just keeps the opaque types around.
Whenever an opaque type `O` is compared with another type `T`, we make the comparison succeed and record `T` as the hidden type. If `O` is compared to `U` while there is a recorded hidden type for it, we grab the recorded type (`T`) and compare that against `U`. This makes implementing
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2515
much simpler (previous attempts on the inference based scheme were very prone to ICEs and general misbehaviour that was not explainable except by random implementation defined oddities).
r? `@nikomatsakis`
fixes#93411fixes#88236
use `fold_list` in `try_super_fold_with` for `SubstsRef`
split out from #93505 as this by itself is responsible for most of the perf improvements there
r? `@michaelwoerister`
Stabilize `-Z instrument-coverage` as `-C instrument-coverage`
(Tracking issue for `instrument-coverage`: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79121)
This PR stabilizes support for instrumentation-based code coverage, previously provided via the `-Z instrument-coverage` option. (Continue supporting `-Z instrument-coverage` for compatibility for now, but show a deprecation warning for it.)
Many, many people have tested this support, and there are numerous reports of it working as expected.
Move the documentation from the unstable book to stable rustc documentation. Update uses and documentation to use the `-C` option.
Addressing questions raised in the tracking issue:
> If/when stabilized, will the compiler flag be updated to -C instrument-coverage? (If so, the -Z variant could also be supported for some time, to ease migrations for existing users and scripts.)
This stabilization PR updates the option to `-C` and keeps the `-Z` variant to ease migration.
> The Rust coverage implementation depends on (and automatically turns on) -Z symbol-mangling-version=v0. Will stabilizing this feature depend on stabilizing v0 symbol-mangling first? If so, what is the current status and timeline?
This stabilization PR depends on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90128 , which stabilizes `-C symbol-mangling-version=v0` (but does not change the default symbol-mangling-version).
> The Rust coverage implementation implements the latest version of LLVM's Coverage Mapping Format (version 4), which forces a dependency on LLVM 11 or later. A compiler error is generated if attempting to compile with coverage, and using an older version of LLVM.
Given that LLVM 13 has now been released, requiring LLVM 11 for coverage support seems like a reasonable requirement. If people don't have at least LLVM 11, nothing else breaks; they just can't use coverage support. Given that coverage support currently requires a nightly compiler and LLVM 11 or newer, allowing it on a stable compiler built with LLVM 11 or newer seems like an improvement.
The [tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79121) and the [issue label A-code-coverage](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/A-code-coverage) link to a few open issues related to `instrument-coverage`, but none of them seem like showstoppers. All of them seem like improvements and refinements we can make after stabilization.
The original `-Z instrument-coverage` support went through a compiler-team MCP at https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/278 . Based on that, `@pnkfelix` suggested that this needed a stabilization PR and a compiler-team FCP.
Fix ret > 1 bound if shadowed by const
Prior to a change, it would only look at types in bounds. When it started looking for consts,
shadowing type variables with a const would cause an ICE, so now defer looking at consts only if
there are no types present.
cc ``````@compiler-errors``````
Should Fix#93553
Prior to a change, it would only look at types in bounds. When it started looking for consts,
shadowing type variables with a const would cause an ICE, so now defer looking at consts only if
there are no types present.
Temporary fix for the layout of aligned enums
Fix for the issue #92464
~~I was after this issue for quite some time now, I have a temporary fix for it.
I think the current problem is [here](e75f96763f/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/layout.rs (L1305-L1310)) created `tag` value might be wrong, because when I checked `min` and `max` values it's always between 0..1, which results in wrong size comparison in a few lines down below.
I think `min` and `max` values don't take `#[repr(aligned(8))]` into consideration and just act from base values assigned inside the enum. If what I am saying is true, aligned enums were created with the wrong layout for some time.~~
~~As stated in the title this is only a temporary fix and I think this needs further investigation, if someone wants to mentor it I would like to work on that too.~~ 😸
**Edit: Weird some tests fail now going to close this for now...**
**Edit2: I made it work again.**
I think I figured out the main problem of the issue, layout types of aligned enums with custom discriminant types were not handled, which resulted in confusing(such as this issue) behavior down the line, this is a kinda hacky fix for the issue.
by using an opaque type obligation to bubble up comparisons between opaque types and other types
Also uses proper obligation causes so that the body id works, because out of some reason nll uses body ids for logic instead of just diagnostics.
Return an indexmap in `all_local_trait_impls` query
The data structure previously used here required that `DefId` be `Ord`. As part of #90317, we do not want `DefId` to implement `Ord`.
Fix two incorrect "it's" (typos in comments)
Found one of these while reading the documentation online. The other came up because it's in the same file.
Make dead code check a query.
Dead code check is run for each invocation of the compiler, even if no modifications were involved.
This PR makes dead code check a query keyed on the module. This allows to skip the check when a module has not changed.
To perform this, a query `live_symbols_and_ignored_derived_traits` is introduced to encapsulate the global analysis of finding live symbols. The second query `check_mod_deathness` outputs diagnostics for each module based on this first query's results.
Continue work on associated const equality
This actually implements some more complex logic for assigning associated consts to values.
Inside of projection candidates, it now defers to a separate function for either consts or
types. To reduce amount of code, projections are now generic over T, where T is either a Type or
a Const. I can add some comments back later, but this was the fastest way to implement it.
It also now finds the correct type of consts in type_of.
---
The current main TODO is finding the const of the def id for the LeafDef.
Right now it works if the function isn't called, but once you use the trait impl with the bound it fails inside projection.
I was hoping to get some help in getting the `&'tcx ty::Const<'tcx>`, in addition to a bunch of other `todo!()`s which I think may not be hit.
r? `@oli-obk`
Updates #92827
rustc_errors: only box the `diagnostic` field in `DiagnosticBuilder`.
I happened to need to do the first change (replacing `allow_suggestions` with equivalent functionality on `Diagnostic` itself) as part of a larger change, and noticed that there's only two fields left in `DiagnosticBuilderInner`.
So with this PR, instead of a single pointer, `DiagnosticBuilder` is two pointers, which should work just as well for passing *it* by value (and may even work better wrt some operations, though probably not by much).
But anything that was already taking advantage of `DiagnosticBuilder` being a single pointer, and wrapping it further (e.g. `Result<T, DiagnosticBuilder>` w/ non-ZST `T`), ~~will probably see a slowdown~~, so I want to do a perf run before even trying to propose this.
Store def_id_to_hir_id as variant in hir_owner.
If hir_owner is Owner(_), the LocalDefId is pointing to an owner, so the ItemLocalId is 0.
If the HIR node does not exist, we store Phantom.
Otherwise, we store the HirId associated to the LocalDefId.
Related to #89278
r? `@oli-obk`
Add note suggesting that predicate may be satisfied, but is not `const`
Not sure if we should be printing this in addition to, or perhaps _instead_ of the help message:
```
help: the trait `~const Add` is not implemented for `NonConstAdd`
```
Also added `ParamEnv::is_const` and `PolyTraitPredicate::is_const_if_const` and, in a separate commit, used those in other places instead of `== hir::Constness::Const`, etc.
r? ````@fee1-dead````
If hir_owner is Owner(_), the LocalDefId is pointing to an owner, so the ItemLocalId is 0.
If the HIR node does not exist, we store Phantom.
Otherwise, we store the HirId associated to the LocalDefId.
