Track PGO profiles in depinfo
This PR makes sure that PGO profiles (`-Cprofile-use` and `-Cprofile-sample-use`) are tracked in depinfo, so that when they change, the compilation session will be invalidated.
This approach was discussed on [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/246057-t-cargo/topic/Tracking.20PGO.20profile.20files.20in.20cargo).
I tried it locally and it seems that the code is recompiled just with this change, and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100413 is not even needed. But it's possible that not everything required is recompiled, so we will probably want to land both changes.
Another approach to implement this could be to store the PGO profiles in `sess.parse_sess.file_depinfo` when the session is being created, but then the paths would have to be converted to a string and then to a symbol, which seemed unnecessarily complicated.
CC `@michaelwoerister`
r? `@Eh2406`
Report number of delayed bugs properly with `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`
Report the number of delayed bugs that went into the `-Ztreat-errr-as-bug=N` being triggered, even if we don't count it in the err_count in regular diagnostic output.
Sometimes we have a session that creates a few diagnostics, perhaps: Error, Delay bug, Error, then Delay bug.
If I ran `-Ztreat-err-as-bug=3`, then I will now see "aborting after 2 errors and 1 delayed bugs" instead of just "after 2 errors" which is confusing since I passed `3`.
Recover from using `;` as separator between fields
Partially fixes#101440 (only for record structs).
Doing that for tuple structs is harder as their parsing passes through a bunch of helper functions. I don't know how to do that. But [their error message is better anyway](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=cc6ee8bb2593596c0cea89d49e79bcb4) and suggests using a comma, even if it doesn't suggest replacing the semicolon with it.
Update `SessionDiagnostic::into_diagnostic` to take `Handler` instead of `ParseSess`
Suggested by the team in [this Zulip Topic](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20SessionDiagnostic.20on.20Handler).
`Handler` already has almost all the capabilities of `ParseSess` when it comes to diagnostic emission, in this migration we only needed to add the ability to access `source_map` from the emitter in order to get a `Snippet` and the `start_point`. Not sure if adding these two methods [`span_to_snippet_from_emitter` and `span_start_point_from_emitter`] is the best way to address this gap.
P.S. If this goes in the right direction, then we probably may want to move `SessionDiagnostic` to `rustc_errors` and rename it to `DiagnosticHandler` or something similar.
r? `@davidtwco`
r? `@compiler-errors`
Suggest removing unnecessary prefix let in patterns
Helps with #101291, though I think `@estebank` probably wants this:
> Finally, I think it'd be nice if we could detect that we don't know for sure and "just" swallow the rest of the expression (find the next ; accounting for nested braces) or the end of the item (easier).
... to be implemented before we close that issue out completely.
Point out when a callable is not actually callable because its return is not sized
Fixes#100755
I didn't add a UI test for that one because it's equivalent to the UI test that already exists in the suite.
`BindingAnnotation` refactor
* `ast::BindingMode` is deleted and replaced with `hir::BindingAnnotation` (which is moved to `ast`)
* `BindingAnnotation` is changed from an enum to a tuple struct e.g. `BindingAnnotation(ByRef::No, Mutability::Mut)`
* Associated constants added for convenience `BindingAnnotation::{NONE, REF, MUT, REF_MUT}`
One goal is to make it more clear that `BindingAnnotation` merely represents syntax `ref mut` and not the actual binding mode. This was especially confusing since we had `ast::BindingMode`->`hir::BindingAnnotation`->`thir::BindingMode`.
I wish there were more symmetry between `ByRef` and `Mutability` (variant) naming (maybe `Mutable::Yes`?), and I also don't love how long the name `BindingAnnotation` is, but this seems like the best compromise. Ideas welcome.
Add a Machine hook for inline assembly
I'm sketching out some support in Miri to "execute" inline assembly. I want this because there are codebases which have very simple inline assembly like hand-written syscall wrappers, and it would be nice to test such code without modification.
r? ``@oli-obk``
