Commit Graph

692 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Guillaume Gomez
a2e485c25c
Rollup merge of #104786 - WaffleLapkin:amp-mut-help, r=compiler-errors
Use the power of adding helper function to simplify code w/ `Mutability`

r? `@compiler-errors`
2022-11-26 17:47:23 +01:00
bors
5dfb4b0afa Auto merge of #104321 - Swatinem:async-gen, r=oli-obk
Avoid `GenFuture` shim when compiling async constructs

Previously, async constructs would be lowered to "normal" generators, with an additional `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim in between to convert from `Generator` to `Future`.

The compiler will now special-case these generators internally so that async constructs will *directly* implement `Future` without the need to go through the `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim.

The primary motivation for this change was hiding this implementation detail in stack traces and debuginfo, but it can in theory also help the optimizer as there is less abstractions to see through.

---

Given this demo code:

```rust
pub async fn a(arg: u32) -> Backtrace {
    let bt = b().await;
    let _arg = arg;
    bt
}

pub async fn b() -> Backtrace {
    Backtrace::force_capture()
}
```

I would get the following with the latest stable compiler (on Windows):

```
   4: async_codegen:🅱️:async_fn$0
             at .\src\lib.rs:10
   5: core::future::from_generator::impl$1::poll<enum2$<async_codegen:🅱️:async_fn_env$0> >
             at /rustc/897e37553bba8b42751c67658967889d11ecd120\library\core\src\future\mod.rs:91
   6: async_codegen:🅰️:async_fn$0
             at .\src\lib.rs:4
   7: core::future::from_generator::impl$1::poll<enum2$<async_codegen:🅰️:async_fn_env$0> >
             at /rustc/897e37553bba8b42751c67658967889d11ecd120\library\core\src\future\mod.rs:91
```

whereas now I get a much cleaner stack trace:

```
   3: async_codegen:🅱️:async_fn$0
             at .\src\lib.rs:10
   4: async_codegen:🅰️:async_fn$0
             at .\src\lib.rs:4
```
2022-11-24 17:14:42 +00:00
Arpad Borsos
9f36f988ad
Avoid GenFuture shim when compiling async constructs
Previously, async constructs would be lowered to "normal" generators,
with an additional `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim in between to
convert from `Generator` to `Future`.

The compiler will now special-case these generators internally so that
async constructs will *directly* implement `Future` without the need
to go through the `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim.

The primary motivation for this change was hiding this implementation
detail in stack traces and debuginfo, but it can in theory also help
the optimizer as there is less abstractions to see through.
2022-11-24 10:04:27 +01:00
bors
341d8b8a2c Auto merge of #103808 - cjgillot:vec-cache, r=TaKO8Ki
Use an IndexVec to cache queries with index-like key

Revival of an old idea. Let's see if it has more effect.

r? `@ghost`
2022-11-24 06:32:23 +00:00
Maybe Waffle
6486ba94a3 random::<Improve<Mutability>>() 2022-11-23 20:39:16 +00:00
The 8472
a9128d8927 fix tests, update size asserts 2022-11-22 23:12:26 +01:00
Vadim Petrochenkov
7a5376d23c Unreserve braced enum variants in value namespace 2022-11-21 22:40:06 +03:00
bors
e07425d55b Auto merge of #98914 - fee1-dead-contrib:min-deref-patterns, r=compiler-errors
Minimal implementation of implicit deref patterns for Strings

cc `@compiler-errors` `@BoxyUwU` https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/88 #87121

~~I forgot to add a feature gate, will do so in a minute~~ Done
2022-11-20 07:16:42 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
c571b2a964
Rollup merge of #104593 - compiler-errors:rpitit-object-safety-spans, r=fee1-dead
Improve spans for RPITIT object-safety errors

No reason why we can't point at the `impl Trait` that causes the object-safety violation.

Also [drive-by: Add is_async fn to hir::IsAsync](c4165f3a96), which touches clippy too.
2022-11-19 15:35:23 +01:00
Michael Goulet
c4165f3a96 drive-by: Add is_async fn to hir::IsAsync 2022-11-19 02:22:24 +00:00
bors
ff0ffda6b3 Auto merge of #104591 - Manishearth:rollup-b3ser4e, r=Manishearth
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #102977 (remove HRTB from `[T]::is_sorted_by{,_key}`)
 - #103378 (Fix mod_inv termination for the last iteration)
 - #103456 (`unchecked_{shl|shr}` should use `u32` as the RHS)
 - #103701 (Simplify some pointer method implementations)
 - #104047 (Diagnostics `icu4x` based list formatting.)
 - #104338 (Enforce that `dyn*` coercions are actually pointer-sized)
 - #104498 (Edit docs for `rustc_errors::Handler::stash_diagnostic`)
 - #104556 (rustdoc: use `code-header` class to format enum variants)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-11-18 23:20:53 +00:00
Michael Goulet
da3c5397a6 Enforce that dyn* casts are actually pointer-sized 2022-11-18 18:23:48 +00:00
Philipp Krones
4e65f5ea82
Add variant_name function to LangItem
Clippy has an internal lint that checks for the usage of hardcoded def
paths and suggests to replace them with a lang or diagnostic item, if
possible. This was implemented with a hack, by getting all the variants
of the `LangItem` enum and then index into it with the position of the
`LangItem` in the `items` list. This is no longer possible, because the
`items` list can't be accessed anymore.
2022-11-17 20:06:25 +01:00
Deadbeef
b2cb42d6a7 Minimal implementation of implicit deref patterns 2022-11-17 12:46:43 +00:00
Camille GILLOT
9d20aca983 Store a LocalDefId in hir::Variant & hir::Field. 2022-11-13 14:06:51 +00:00
Camille GILLOT
607d0c2a14 Store a LocalDefId in hir::AnonConst. 2022-11-13 14:06:11 +00:00
Camille GILLOT
18482f7b23 Store a LocalDefId in hir::GenericParam. 2022-11-13 14:05:30 +00:00
Camille GILLOT
290f0781b4 Store LocalDefId in hir::Closure. 2022-11-13 14:04:02 +00:00
Oli Scherer
44d1936d00 Some tracing and comment cleanups 2022-11-04 17:10:07 +00:00
Santiago Pastorino
ba18f16e81
Add visit_fn_ret_ty to hir intravisit 2022-11-03 10:41:22 -03:00
Samuel Moelius
e604327286 Reorder walk_ functions in intravisit.rs 2022-11-01 19:02:45 -04:00
Camille GILLOT
07f1948043 Implement Idx for OwnerId. 2022-11-01 17:02:51 +00:00
Dylan DPC
43634675f6
Rollup merge of #103061 - Amanieu:rewrite_alloc_error_handler, r=bjorn3
Rewrite implementation of `#[alloc_error_handler]`

The new implementation doesn't use weak lang items and instead changes `#[alloc_error_handler]` to an attribute macro just like `#[global_allocator]`.

The attribute will generate the `__rg_oom` function which is called by the compiler-generated `__rust_alloc_error_handler`. If no `__rg_oom` function is defined in any crate then the compiler shim will call `__rdl_oom` in the alloc crate which will simply panic.

This also fixes link errors with `-C link-dead-code` with `default_alloc_error_handler`: `__rg_oom` was previously defined in the alloc crate and would attempt to reference the `oom` lang item, even if it didn't exist. This worked as long as `__rg_oom` was excluded from linking since it was not called.

This is a prerequisite for the stabilization of `default_alloc_error_handler` (#102318).
2022-11-01 14:12:25 +05:30
Yuki Okushi
2125181b7d
Rollup merge of #103692 - smoelius:walk_generic_arg, r=fee1-dead
Add `walk_generic_arg`

Could this please be added?

I could use it for a Clippy lint.
2022-11-01 12:03:41 +09:00
Amanieu d'Antras
56074b5231 Rewrite implementation of #[alloc_error_handler]
The new implementation doesn't use weak lang items and instead changes
`#[alloc_error_handler]` to an attribute macro just like
`#[global_allocator]`.

The attribute will generate the `__rg_oom` function which is called by
the compiler-generated `__rust_alloc_error_handler`. If no `__rg_oom`
function is defined in any crate then the compiler shim will call
`__rdl_oom` in the alloc crate which will simply panic.

This also fixes link errors with `-C link-dead-code` with
`default_alloc_error_handler`: `__rg_oom` was previously defined in the
alloc crate and would attempt to reference the `oom` lang item, even if
it didn't exist. This worked as long as `__rg_oom` was excluded from
linking since it was not called.

This is a prerequisite for the stabilization of
`default_alloc_error_handler` (#102318).
2022-10-31 16:32:57 +00:00
Cameron Steffen
a6180ede5c Simplify lang item groups 2022-10-29 16:04:10 -05:00
Cameron Steffen
6621279a75 Cleanup weak lang items 2022-10-29 16:04:10 -05:00
Cameron Steffen
1e349fb0dd Use an array in LanguageItems 2022-10-29 16:04:10 -05:00
Cameron Steffen
f808430497 Factor out ITEM_REFS 2022-10-29 16:04:10 -05:00
Cameron Steffen
ebfa1f0185 Encode LangItem directly 2022-10-29 16:04:10 -05:00
Cameron Steffen
99de57ae13 Improve LanguageItems api 2022-10-29 16:04:04 -05:00
Nicholas Nethercote
c8c25ce5a1 Rename some OwnerId fields.
spastorino noticed some silly expressions like `item_id.def_id.def_id`.

This commit renames several `def_id: OwnerId` fields as `owner_id`, so
those expressions become `item_id.owner_id.def_id`.

`item_id.owner_id.local_def_id` would be even clearer, but the use of
`def_id` for values of type `LocalDefId` is *very* widespread, so I left
that alone.
2022-10-29 20:28:38 +11:00
Samuel Moelius
86a4009586 Add walk_generic_arg 2022-10-28 10:36:42 -04:00
Boxy
b3425587a6 tidy + move logic to fn 2022-10-27 22:29:16 +01:00
Nilstrieb
7bfef19844 Use tidy-alphabetical in the compiler 2022-10-12 17:49:10 +05:30
Vadim Petrochenkov
1a8f177772 rustc_hir: Less error-prone methods for accessing PartialRes resolution 2022-10-11 09:04:52 +04:00
Yuki Okushi
24424d0acb
Rollup merge of #102829 - compiler-errors:rename-impl-item-kind, r=TaKO8Ki
rename `ImplItemKind::TyAlias` to `ImplItemKind::Type`

The naming of this variant seems inconsistent given that this is not really a "type alias", and the associated type variant for `TraitItemKind` is just called `Type`.
2022-10-10 00:09:42 +09:00
Michael Goulet
70f3c79c50 ImplItemKind::TyAlias => ImplItemKind::Type 2022-10-09 07:09:57 +00:00
bors
0152393048 Auto merge of #99324 - reez12g:issue-99144, r=jyn514
Enable doctests in compiler/ crates

Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99144
2022-10-06 03:01:57 +00:00
reez12g
9a4c5abe45 Remove from compiler/ crates 2022-09-29 16:49:04 +09:00
Nicholas Nethercote
f07d4efc45 Shrink hir::def::Res.
`Res::SelfTy` currently has two `Option`s. When the second one is `Some`
the first one is never consulted. So we can split it into two variants,
`Res::SelfTyParam` and `Res::SelfTyAlias`, reducing the size of `Res`
from 24 bytes to 12. This then shrinks `hir::Path` and
`hir::PathSegment`, which are the HIR types that take up the most space.
2022-09-29 08:44:52 +10:00
Camille GILLOT
337a73da6e Do not overwrite binders for another HirId. 2022-09-27 18:58:37 +02:00
Pietro Albini
3975d55d98
remove cfg(bootstrap) 2022-09-26 10:14:45 +02:00
fee1-dead
804c2c1ed9
Rollup merge of #102197 - Nilstrieb:const-new-🌲, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Stabilize const `BTree{Map,Set}::new`

The FCP was completed in #71835.

Since `len` and `is_empty` are not const stable yet, this also creates a new feature for them since they previously used the same `const_btree_new` feature.
2022-09-26 13:09:42 +08:00
Takayuki Maeda
8fe936099a separate definitions and HIR owners
fix a ui test

use `into`

fix clippy ui test

fix a run-make-fulldeps test

implement `IntoQueryParam<DefId>` for `OwnerId`

use `OwnerId` for more queries

change the type of `ParentOwnerIterator::Item` to `(OwnerId, OwnerNode)`
2022-09-24 23:21:19 +09:00
Nilstrieb
aa35ab81ea Stabilize const BTree{Map,Set}::new
Since `len` and `is_empty` are not const stable yet, this also
creates a new feature for them since they previously used the same
`const_btree_new` feature.
2022-09-23 20:55:37 +02:00
Dylan DPC
3ad81e0dd8
Rollup merge of #93628 - est31:stabilize_let_else, r=joshtriplett
Stabilize `let else`

🎉  **Stabilizes the `let else` feature, added by [RFC 3137](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3137).** 🎉

Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1156

closes #87335 (`let else` tracking issue)

FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1029383585

----------

## Stabilization report

### Summary

The feature allows refutable patterns in `let` statements if the expression is
followed by a diverging `else`:

```Rust
fn get_count_item(s: &str) -> (u64, &str) {
    let mut it = s.split(' ');
    let (Some(count_str), Some(item)) = (it.next(), it.next()) else {
        panic!("Can't segment count item pair: '{s}'");
    };
    let Ok(count) = u64::from_str(count_str) else {
        panic!("Can't parse integer: '{count_str}'");
    };
    (count, item)
}
assert_eq!(get_count_item("3 chairs"), (3, "chairs"));
```

### Differences from the RFC / Desugaring

Outside of desugaring I'm not aware of any differences between the implementation and the RFC. The chosen desugaring has been changed from the RFC's [original](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3137-let-else.html#reference-level-explanations). You can read a detailed discussion of the implementation history of it in `@cormacrelf` 's [summary](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1041143670) in this thread, as well as the [followup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1046598419). Since that followup, further changes have happened to the desugaring, in #98574, #99518, #99954. The later changes were mostly about the drop order: On match, temporaries drop in the same order as they would for a `let` declaration. On mismatch, temporaries drop before the `else` block.

### Test cases

In chronological order as they were merged.

Added by df9a2e0687 (#87688):

* [`ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs) to ensure the unreachable pattern lint visits patterns inside `let else`.

Added by 5b95df4bdc (#87688):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs) to ensure that no lazy boolean expressions (using `&&` or `||`) are allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs) to ensure that no `}` directly preceding the `else` is allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs) to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for the `else` block.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs) to ensure that the `irrefutable_let_patterns` lint fires.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs) to ensure the presence of semicolons at the end of the `let` statement.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs) to ensure the `else` block diverges.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs) to ensure the feature works in some simple test case settings.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs) to ensure the bindings created by the outer `let` expression are not available in the `else` block of it.

Added by bf7c32a447 (#89965):

* [`ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs) as a regression test for the ICE-on-error bug #89960 . Later in 102b9125e1 this got removed in favour of more comprehensive tests.

Added by 856541963c (#89974):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs) to test for the improved error message that points out that `let else if` is not possible.

Added by 9b45713b6c:

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs) as a regression test for #89807, to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for bindings created by the `let else` pattern.

Added by 61bcd8d307 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs) to ensure that a copy is performed out of non-copy wrapper types. This mirrors `if let` behaviour. The test case bases on rustc internal changes originally meant for #89933 but then removed from the PR due to the error prior to the improvements of #89841.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs) to ensure that while there is a move of the binding in the successful case, the `else` case can still access the non-matching value. This mirrors `if let` behaviour.

Added by 102b9125e1 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs) to check `ref` and `ref mut` keywords in the pattern work correctly and error when needed.

Added by 2715c5f984 (#89841):

* Match ergonomic tests adapted from the `rfc2005` test suite.

Added by fec8a507a2 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs) to check deref coercions.

#### Added since this stabilization report was originally written (2022-02-09)

Added by 76ea566677 (#94211):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.63.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs) to give a nice error message if an user tries to do an assignment with a (possibly refutable) pattern and an `else` block, like asked for in #93995.

Added by e7730dcb7e (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs) to test whether `#[allow(unused_variables)]` works in the expr, as well as its non presence, as well as putting it on the entire `let else` *affects* the expr, too. This was adding a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.
* Expansion of `ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs` and `ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs` to ensure that non-presence of `#[allow(unused)]` does issue the unused lint. This was adding a missing test case as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5bd71063b3 (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs), a regression test for #92069, which got fixed without addition of a regression test. This resolves a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5374688e1d (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs) to test the interaction of async/await with `let else`

Added by 6c529ded86 (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a (partial) regression test for #98672

Added by 9b56640106 (#99518):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a regression test for #93951
* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #98672 (especially regarding `else` drop order)

Added by baf9a7cb57 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #93951, similar to `let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`

Added by 60be2de8b7 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a program that can now be compiled thanks to borrow checker implications of #99518

Added by 47a7a91c96 (#100132):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs), as a regression test for #100103, to ensure that there is no ICE when doing `Err(...)?` inside else blocks.

Added by e3c5bd617d (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs), to verify that there is no unreachable code error with the current desugaring.

Added by 981852677c (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs), to make sure that a correct span is emitted for a missing trailing expression error. Regression test for #94176.

Added by e182d12a84 (#100434):

* [src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs), as a regression test to ensure pretty printing works for `let else` (this bug surfaced in many different ways)

Added by e26285603c (#99954):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) extended to contain & borrows as well, as this was identified as an earlier issue with the desugaring: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98672#issuecomment-1200196921

Added by 2d8460ef43 (#99291):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs) a matrix based test for various drop order behaviour of `let else`. Especially, it verifies equality of `let` and `let else` drop orders, [resolving](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1238498468) a [stabilization blocker](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523).

Added by 1b87ce0d40 (#101410):

* Edit to `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to add the `-Zvalidate-mir` flag, as a regression test for #99228

Added by af591ebe4d (#101410):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs) as a regression test for the ICE #99975.

Added by this PR:

* `ui/let-else/let-else.rs`, a simple run-pass check, similar to `ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`.

### Things not currently tested

* ~~The `#[allow(...)]` tests check whether allow works, but they don't check whether the non-presence of allow causes a lint to fire.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~There is no `#[allow(...)]` test for the expression, as there are tests for the pattern and the else block.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~`let-else-brace-before-else.rs` forbids the `let ... = {} else {}` pattern and there is a rustfix to obtain `let ... = ({}) else {}`. I'm not sure whether the `.fixed` files are checked by the tooling that they compile. But if there is no such check, it would be neat to make sure that `let ... = ({}) else {}` compiles.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~#92069 got closed as fixed, but no regression test was added. Not sure it's worth to add one.~~ → *test added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc*
* ~~consistency between `let else` and `if let` regarding lifetimes and drop order: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523~~ → *test added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc*

Edit: they are all tested now.

### Possible future work / Refutable destructuring assignments

[RFC 2909](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2909-destructuring-assignment.html) specifies destructuring assignment, allowing statements like `FooBar { a, b, c } = foo();`.
As it was stabilized, destructuring assignment only allows *irrefutable* patterns, which before the advent of `let else` were the only patterns that `let` supported.
So the combination of `let else` and destructuring assignments gives reason to think about extensions of the destructuring assignments feature that allow refutable patterns, discussed in #93995.

A naive mapping of `let else` to destructuring assignments in the form of `Some(v) = foo() else { ... };` might not be the ideal way. `let else` needs a diverging `else` clause as it introduces new bindings, while assignments have a default behaviour to fall back to if the pattern does not match, in the form of not performing the assignment. Thus, there is no good case to require divergence, or even an `else` clause at all, beyond the need for having *some* introducer syntax so that it is clear to readers that the assignment is not a given (enums and structs look similar). There are better candidates for introducer syntax however than an empty `else {}` clause, like `maybe` which could be added as a keyword on an edition boundary:

```Rust
let mut v = 0;
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v);
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v) else { bar() };
```

Further design discussion is left to an RFC, or the linked issue.
2022-09-17 15:31:06 +05:30
Rageking8
d433efa649 more simple formatting 2022-09-16 19:07:42 +08:00
est31
173eb6f407 Only enable the let_else feature on bootstrap
On later stages, the feature is already stable.

Result of running:

rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
2022-09-15 21:06:45 +02:00
bors
a0d1df4a5d Auto merge of #101709 - nnethercote:simplify-visitors-more, r=cjgillot
Simplify visitors more

A successor to #100392.

r? `@cjgillot`
2022-09-14 05:21:14 +00:00