add incremental test for issue 135514
r? `@compiler-errors` as requested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135514#issuecomment-2591614811
This adds parts of `@steffahn's` repro as an incremental test for #135514. I had initially added the actual exploitation of the issue into the safe transmute, but removed it because it's not exactly needed for such a test. I can add it back if you'd like.
I've verified that the test fails with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133828 reverted.
fix typo in typenames of pin documentation
I noticed this whilst reading the documentation for pin.
Basically there was just one to many closing angle brackets on the type parameters in the documentation where instead of being `Pin<&mut T>` it was `Pin<&mut T>>`
Add COPYRIGHT-*.html files to distribution and update `COPYRIGHT`
* Updates the `COPYRIGHT` file to describe how we actually do things now, and removes the licence text from it as they are stored elsewhere.
* dist tarballs get all of the files in `LICENSES/*`.
* This folder is managed by `reuse` and each file exists because we refer to the licence somewhere in our tree. We should be supplying these licence texts to anyone who obtains a copy of the source code and now we do.
* The binary rust tarball gets `COPYRIGHT.html` and `COPYRIGHT-library.html`, which are auto-generated files that describe the licence information for both the in-tree source files used to build the Rust toolchain, and the out-of-tree dependencies we used to build the toolchain.
* The other binary tarballs are unchanged, for now. In future you need to make a call whether to ship multiple version of COPYRIGHT.html, or whether to try and make, for example, a cargo-specific COPYRIGHT.html file.
* The `LICENSE-MIT` file now includes a blanket copyright statement, as the text indicates that it should and because users will expect to know who owns the copyright of the material they have been given (even if the answer is 'lots of people').
try-job: x86_64-fuchsia
TRPL: incorporate all backward-compatible Edition changes
This incorporates all the backwards-compatible changes for the 2024 Edition on stable. There will also be a follow-on PR to land revisions to the new chapter on async so it can be as ready as possible when officially released with 1.85 and the 2024 Edition.
Additionally, there are a few other, non-backward-compatible, changes (largely around `use<..>`) we can only land using the stable edition, which we may or may not be able to land in 1.85 by using the beta toolchain in the example code. Those may or may not be ported over, depending on how that does or does not play with the infrastructure.
There is also an accompanying PR, #135508, to land these changes on `beta` so they can go out with 1.85 and the Edition release.
Prefer lower `TraitUpcasting` candidates in selection
Fixes#135463. The underlying cause is this ambiguity, but it's more clear (and manifests as a coercion error, rather than a MIR validation error) when it's written the way I did in the UI test.
Sorry this is cursed r? lcnr
rustdoc: Remove `AttributesExt` trait magic that added needless complexity
The new code is more explicit and avoids trait magic that added needless
complexity to this part of rustdoc.
deprecate `std::intrinsics::transmute` etc, use `std::mem::*` instead
The `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` attribute lets users call `std::mem::transmute` as `std::intrinsics::transmute`. The former is a reexport of the latter, and for a long time we didn't properly check stability for reexports, so making this a hard error now would be a breaking change for little gain. But at the same time, `std::intrinsics::transmute` is not the intended path for this function, so I think it is a good idea to show a deprecation warning when that path is used. This PR implements that, for all the functions in `std::intrinsics` that carry the attribute.
I assume this will need ``@rust-lang/libs-api`` FCP.
std: lazily allocate the main thread handle
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123550 eliminated the allocation of the main thread handle, but at the cost of greatly increased complexity. This PR proposes another approach: Instead of creating the main thread handle itself, the runtime simply remembers the thread ID of the main thread. The main thread handle is then only allocated when it is used, using the same lazy-initialization mechanism as for non-runtime use of `thread::current`, and the `name` method uses the thread ID to identify the main thread handle and return the correct name ("main") for it.
Thereby, we also allow accessing `thread::current` before main: as the runtime no longer tries to install its own handle, this will no longer trigger an abort. Rather, the name returned from `name` will only be "main" after the runtime initialization code has run, but I think that is acceptable.
This new approach also requires some changes to the signal handling code, as calling `thread::current` would now allocate when called on the main thread, which is not acceptable. I fixed this by adding a new function (`with_current_name`) that performs all the naming logic without allocation or without initializing the thread ID (which could allocate on some platforms).
Reverts #123550, CC ``@GnomedDev``
Treat safe target_feature functions as unsafe by default [less invasive variant]
This unblocks
* #134090
As I stated in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134090#issuecomment-2541332415 I think the previous impl was too easy to get wrong, as by default it treated safe target feature functions as safe and had to add additional checks for when they weren't. Now the logic is inverted. By default they are unsafe and you have to explicitly handle safe target feature functions.
This is the less (imo) invasive variant of #134317, as it doesn't require changing the Safety enum, so it only affects FnDefs and nothing else, as it should.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132397 (Make missing_abi lint warn-by-default.)
- #133807 (ci: Enable opt-dist for dist-aarch64-linux builds)
- #134143 (Convert `struct FromBytesWithNulError` into enum)
- #134338 (Use a C-safe return type for `__rust_[ui]128_*` overflowing intrinsics)
- #134678 (Update `ReadDir::next` in `std::sys::pal::unix::fs` to use `&raw const (*p).field` instead of `p.byte_offset().cast()`)
- #135424 (Detect unstable lint docs that dont enable their feature)
- #135520 (Make sure we actually use the right trivial lifetime substs when eagerly monomorphizing drop for ADTs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make sure we actually use the right trivial lifetime substs when eagerly monomorphizing drop for ADTs
Absolutely clueless mistake of mine. Whoops.
When eagerly collecting mono items, when we encounter an ADT, we try to monomorphize its drop glue. In #135313, I made it so that this acts more like eagerly monomorphizing functions, where we allow (in this case) ADTs with lifetimes, since those can be erased by codegen.
However, I did not account for the call to `instantiate_and_check_impossible_predicates`, which was still passing an empty set of args. This means that if the ADT in question had any predicates, we'd get an index out of bounds panic.
This PR creates the correct set of args for the ADT.
Fixes#135515. I assume that this manifests in that issue because of `-Clink-dead-code` or something.
Detect unstable lint docs that dont enable their feature
Makes sure that we detect cases where unstable lint's docs don't enable the corresponding feature.
r? ehuss
Update `ReadDir::next` in `std::sys::pal::unix::fs` to use `&raw const (*p).field` instead of `p.byte_offset().cast()`
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1387 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117572, `&raw mut (*p).field`/`addr_of!((*p).field)` is defined to have the same inbounds preconditions as `ptr::offset`/`ptr::byte_offset`. I.e. `&raw const (*p).field` does not require that `p: *const T` point to a full `size_of::<T>()` bytes of memory, only that `p.byte_add(offset_of!(T, field))` is defined.
The old comment "[...] we don't even get to use `&raw const (*entry_ptr).d_name` because that operation requires the full extent of *entry_ptr to be in bounds of the same allocation, which is not necessarily the case here [...]" is now outdated, and the code can be simplified to use `&raw const (*entry_ptr).field`.
-------
There should be no behavior differences from this PR.
The `: *const dirent64` on line 716 and the `const _: usize = mem::offset_of!(dirent64, $field);` and comment on lines 749-751 are just sanity checks and should not affect semantics.
Since the `offset_ptr!` macro is only called three times, and all with the same local variable entry_ptr, I just used the local variable directly in the macro instead of taking it as an input, and renamed the macro to `entry_field_ptr!`.
The whole macro could also be removed and replaced with just using `&raw const (*entry_ptr).field` in the three places, but the comments on the macro seemed worthwhile to keep.
Use a C-safe return type for `__rust_[ui]128_*` overflowing intrinsics
Combined with [1], this will change the overflowing multiplication operations to return an `extern "C"`-safe type.
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/735 [1]
Convert `struct FromBytesWithNulError` into enum
This PR renames the former `kind` enum from `FromBytesWithNulErrorKind` to `FromBytesWithNulError`, and removes the original struct.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/493
## Possible Changes - TBD
* [x] should the new `enum FromBytesWithNulError` derive `Copy`?
* [ ] should there be any new/changed attributes?
* [x] add some more tests
## Problem
One of `CStr` constructors, `CStr::from_bytes_with_nul(bytes: &[u8])` handles 3 cases:
1. `bytes` has one NULL as the last value - creates CStr
2. `bytes` has no NULL - error
3. `bytes` has a NULL in some other position - error
The 3rd case is error that may require lossy conversion, but the 2nd case can easily be handled by the user code. Unfortunately, this function returns an opaque `FromBytesWithNulError` error in both 2nd and 3rd case, so the user cannot detect just the 2nd case - having to re-implement the entire function and bring in the `memchr` dependency.
## Motivating examples or use cases
In [this code](f86d7a8768/varnish-sys/src/vcl/ws.rs (L158)), my FFI code needs to copy user's `&[u8]` into a C-allocated memory blob in a NUL-terminated `CStr` format. My code must first validate if `&[u8]` has a trailing NUL (case 1), no NUL (adds one on the fly - case 2), or NUL in the middle (3rd case - error). I had to re-implement `from_bytes_with_nul` and add `memchr`dependency just to handle the 2nd case.
r? `@Amanieu`
ci: Enable opt-dist for dist-aarch64-linux builds
Move the CI dist-aarch64-linux job to an aarch64 runner and enable optimised dist builds with the opt-dist pipeline.
For the time being, disable bolt on aarch64 due to upstream bolt bugs.
r? `@Kobzol`
cc `@lqd`
try-job: dist-aarch64-linux
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #134913 (bootstrap: do not rely on LIBRARY_PATH env variable)
- #134940 (Make sure to scrape region constraints from deeply normalizing type outlives assumptions in borrowck)
- #135228 (Improve `DispatchFromDyn` and `CoerceUnsized` impl validation)
- #135264 (Consider more erroneous layouts as `LayoutError::ReferencesError` to suppress spurious errors)
- #135302 (for purely return-type based searches, deprioritize clone-like functions)
- #135353 (re-add --disable-minification to rustdoc)
- #135380 (Make sure we can produce `ConstArgHasWrongType` errors for valtree consts)
- #135423 (Enforce syntactical stability of const traits in HIR)
- #135425 (Do not consider traits that have unsatisfied const conditions to be conditionally const)
- #135499 (fix underlining of hovered intra-doc links.)
- #135505 (Fix clippy lints in rustdoc)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Also, the macro is only called three times, and all with the same local variable entry_ptr, so just use the local variable directly,
and rename the macro to entry_field_ptr.
Do not consider traits that have unsatisfied const conditions to be conditionally const
This will improve error messages as we continue to constify traits, since we don't want to start calling things "conditionally const" if they aren't implemented with a const impl anyways.
The only case that this affects today is `Deref` since that's one of the only constified traits in the standard library :)
r? RalfJung
Enforce syntactical stability of const traits in HIR
This PR enforces what I'm calling *syntactical* const stability of traits. In other words, it enforces the ability to name `~const`/`const` traits in trait bounds in various syntax positions in HIR (including in the trait of an impl header). This functionality is analogous to the *regular* item stability checker, which is concerned with making sure that you cannot refer to unstable items by name, and is implemented as an extension of that pass.
This is separate from enforcing the *recursive* const stability of const trait methods, which is implemented in MIR and runs on MIR bodies. That will require adding a new `NonConstOp` to the const checker and probably adjusting some logic to deduplicate redundant errors.
However, this check is separate and necessary for making sure that users don't add `~const`/`const` bounds to items when the trait is not const-stable in the first place. I chose to separate enforcing recursive const stability out of this PR to make it easier to review. I'll probably open a follow-up following this one, blocked on this PR.
r? `@RalfJung` cc `@rust-lang/project-const-traits`
Make sure we can produce `ConstArgHasWrongType` errors for valtree consts
I forgot about `ty::ConstKind::Value` in #134771.
The error message here could use some work -- both in the new trait solver and the old trait solver. But unrelated to the issue here.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135361 -- this was only ICEing in coherence because coherence uses the new trait solver, but I don't think the minimization is worth committing compared to the test I added.
r? ```@lcnr``` or ```@BoxyUwU```
re-add --disable-minification to rustdoc
this also makes the rust.docs-minification option work as advertised in config.toml
nothing fancy this time, this is intended to be perma-unstable. it's only really here for the benefit of rustdoc devs.
mitegates https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135345
It was removed in f9e1f6ffdf.
Improve `DispatchFromDyn` and `CoerceUnsized` impl validation
* Disallow arbitrary 1-ZST fields in `DispatchFromDyn` -- only `PhantomData`, and 1-ZSTs that mention no params (which is needed to support, e.g., the `Global` alloctor in `Box<T, U = Global>`).
* Don't allow coercing between non-ZSTs to ZSTs (since the previous check wasn't actually checking the field tys were the same before checking the layout...)
* Normalize the field before checking it's `PhantomData`.
Fixes#135215Fixes#135214Fixes#135220
r? ```@BoxyUwU``` or reassign
