[rustc_data_structures][perf] Simplify base_n::push_str.
This minor change removes the need to reverse resulting digits. Since reverse is O(|digit_num|) but bounded by 128, it's unlikely to be a noticeable in practice. At the same time, this code is also a 1 line shorter, so combined with tiny perf win, why not?
I ran https://gist.github.com/ttsugriy/ed14860ef597ab315d4129d5f8adb191 on M1 macbook air and got a small improvement
```
Running benches/base_n_benchmark.rs (target/release/deps/base_n_benchmark-825fe5895b5c2693)
push_str/old time: [14.180 µs 14.313 µs 14.462 µs]
Performance has improved.
Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%)
4 (4.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
push_str/new time: [13.741 µs 13.839 µs 13.973 µs]
Performance has improved.
Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
5 (5.00%) high severe
```
[rustc_data_structures] Simplify SortedMap::insert.
It looks like current usage of `swap` is aimed at achieving what `std::mem::replace` does but more concisely and idiomatically.
This minor change removes the need to reverse resulting digits.
Since reverse is O(|digit_num|) but bounded by 128, it's unlikely
to be a noticeable in practice. At the same time, this code is
also a 1 line shorter, so combined with tiny perf win, why not?
I ran https://gist.github.com/ttsugriy/ed14860ef597ab315d4129d5f8adb191
on M1 macbook air and got a small improvement
```
Running benches/base_n_benchmark.rs (target/release/deps/base_n_benchmark-825fe5895b5c2693)
push_str/old time: [14.180 µs 14.313 µs 14.462 µs]
Performance has improved.
Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%)
4 (4.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
push_str/new time: [13.741 µs 13.839 µs 13.973 µs]
Performance has improved.
Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
5 (5.00%) high severe
```
It no longer has any uses. If it's needed in the future, it can be
easily reinstated. Or a crate such as `smallstr` can be used, much like
we use `smallvec`.
Removed unnecessary &String -> &str, now that &String implements StableOrd as well
Applied a few nits suggested by lcnr to PR #110040 (nits can be found [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110040#pullrequestreview-1469452191).)
Making a new PR because the old one was already merged, and given that this just applies changes that were already suggested, reviewing it should be fairly open-and-shut.
Don't leak the function that is called on drop
It probably wasn't causing problems anyway, but still, a `// this leaks, please don't pass anything that owns memory` is not sustainable.
I could implement a version which does not require `Option`, but it would require `unsafe`, at which point it's probably not worth it.
Use `Option::is_some_and` and `Result::is_ok_and` in the compiler
`.is_some_and(..)`/`.is_ok_and(..)` replace `.map_or(false, ..)` and `.map(..).unwrap_or(false)`, making the code more readable.
This PR is a sibling of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111873#issuecomment-1561316515
Preprocess and cache dominator tree
Preprocessing dominators has a very strong effect for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111344.
That pass checks that assignments dominate their uses repeatedly. Using the unprocessed dominator tree caused a quadratic runtime (number of bbs x depth of the dominator tree).
This PR also caches the dominator tree and the pre-processed dominators in the MIR cfg cache.
Rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107157
cc `@tmiasko`
Process current bucket instead of parent's bucket when starting loop for dominators.
The linked paper by Georgiadis suggests in §2.2.3 to process `bucket[w]` when beginning the loop, instead of `bucket[parent[w]]` when finishing it.
In the test case, we correctly computed `idom[2] = 0` and `sdom[3] = 1`, but the algorithm returned `idom[3] = 1`, instead of the correct value 0, because of the path 0-7-2-3.
This provoked LLVM ICE in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111061#issuecomment-1546912112. LLVM checks that SSA assignments dominate uses using its own implementation of Lengauer-Tarjan, and saw case where rustc was breaking the dominance property.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
