Remove SpecOptionPartialEq
With the recent LLVM bump, the specialization for Option::partial_eq on types with niches is no longer necessary. I kept the manual implementation as it still gives us better codegen than the derive (will look at this seperately).
Also implemented PartialOrd/Ord by hand as it _somewhat_ improves codegen for #49892: https://godbolt.org/z/vx5Y6oW4Y
Doc Guarantee: BTree(Set|Map): `IntoIter` Iterate in Sorted by key Order
This Doc-only PR adds text to the IntoIterator implementation and IntoIter type for both BTreeMap and BTreeSet that states that the returned items will be in sorted-by-key order, this is a guarantee that is made by the iter() and iter_mut() methods of BTreeMap/Set and BTreeMap respectively, but not on into_iter methods or types.
I don't know how the IntoIter iteration would not be sorted by key, and I would like to rely on that behavior for my prefix_array crate.
The text appended to IntoIter documentation is based on each types respective iter() method documentation, as is the text used in the IntoIterator documentation; they are slightly inconsistent between Set/Map, but they are consistent within their own types documentation.
select Vec::from_iter impls in a const block to optimize compile times
Ignoring whitespace diffs should make this easier to review.
This relies on the trick from #122301
Split out from #120682
Make `type_ascribe!` not a built-in
The only weird thing is the macro expansion note. I wonder if we should suppress these 🤔
r? ````@fmease```` since you told me about builtin# lol
Add `usize::MAX` arg tests for Vec
Tests to prevent recurrence of the UB from the rust-lang/rust#122760 issue.
I skipped the `with_capacity`, `drain`, `reserve`, etc. APIs because they actually had a good assortment of tests earlier in the same file.
r? Nilstrieb
Relax SeqCst ordering in standard library.
Every single SeqCst in the standard library is unnecessary. In all cases, Relaxed or Release+Acquire was sufficient.
As I [wrote](https://marabos.nl/atomics/memory-ordering.html#common-misconceptions) in my book on atomics:
> [..] when reading code, SeqCst basically tells the reader: "this operation depends on the total order of every single SeqCst operation in the program," which is an incredibly far-reaching claim. The same code would likely be easier to review and verify if it used weaker memory ordering instead, if possible. For example, Release effectively tells the reader: "this relates to an acquire operation on the same variable," which involves far fewer considerations when forming an understanding of the code.
>
> It is advisable to see SeqCst as a warning sign. Seeing it in the wild often means that either something complicated is going on, or simply that the author did not take the time to analyze their memory ordering related assumptions, both of which are reasons for extra scrutiny.
r? ````@Amanieu```` ````@joboet````
fix OOB pointer formed in Vec::index
Move the length check to before using `index` with `ptr::add` to prevent an out of bounds pointer from being formed.
Fixes#122760
For async closures, cap closure kind, get rid of `by_mut_body`
Right now we have three `AsyncFn*` traits, and three corresponding futures that are returned by the `call_*` functions for them. This is fine, but it is a bit excessive, since the future returned by `AsyncFn` and `AsyncFnMut` are identical. Really, the only distinction we need to make with these bodies is "by ref" and "by move".
This PR removes `AsyncFn::CallFuture` and renames `AsyncFnMut::CallMutFuture` to `AsyncFnMut::CallRefFuture`. This simplifies MIR building for async closures, since we don't need to build an extra "by mut" body, but just a "by move" body which is materially different.
We need to do a bit of delicate handling of the ClosureKind for async closures, since we need to "cap" it to `AsyncFnMut` in some cases when we only care about what body we're looking for.
This also fixes a bug where `<{async closure} as Fn>::call` was returning a body that takes the async-closure receiver *by move*.
This also helps align the `AsyncFn` traits to the `LendingFn` traits' eventual designs.
Expose `ucred::peer_cred` on QNX targets to enable dist builds
After following https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/platform-support/nto-qnx.html I attempted to run the following `x.py` command:
```bash
export build_env='
CC_aarch64-unknown-nto-qnx710=qcc
CFLAGS_aarch64-unknown-nto-qnx710=-Vgcc_ntoaarch64le_cxx
CXX_aarch64-unknown-nto-qnx710=qcc
AR_aarch64_unknown_nto_qnx710=ntoaarch64-ar
CC_x86_64-pc-nto-qnx710=qcc
CFLAGS_x86_64-pc-nto-qnx710=-Vgcc_ntox86_64_cxx
CXX_x86_64-pc-nto-qnx710=qcc
AR_x86_64_pc_nto_qnx710=ntox86_64-ar'
env $build_env ./x.py --stage 2 dist rust-std --target aarch64-unknown-nto-qnx710,x86_64-pc-nto-qnx710,x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
```
The result was the following error:
```
Compiling object v0.32.2
Compiling std_detect v0.1.5 (/home/ana/git/rust-lang/rust/library/stdarch/crates/std_detect)
Compiling addr2line v0.21.0
error: function `peer_cred` is never used
--> library/std/src/os/unix/net/ucred.rs:89:12
|
89 | pub fn peer_cred(socket: &UnixStream) -> io::Result<UCred> {
| ^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D dead-code` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(dead_code)]`
error: could not compile `std` (lib) due to 1 previous error
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:06:25
```
I contacted `@flba-eb` and `@gh-tr` over email and we confirmed that `peer_cred` here should be flagged on `nto` targets. This should enable the clean `x.py --stage 2 dist rust-std` command on these platforms.
various clippy fixes
We need to keep the order of the given clippy lint rules before passing them.
Since clap doesn't offer any useful interface for this purpose out of the box,
we have to handle it manually.
Additionally, this PR makes `-D` rules work as expected. Previously, lint rules were limited to `-W`. By enabling `-D`, clippy began to complain numerous lines in the tree, all of which have been resolved in this PR as well.
Fixes#121481
cc `@matthiaskrgr`
