Consolidate Result's and Option's methods into fewer impl blocks
`Result`'s and `Option`'s methods have historically been separated up into `impl` blocks based on their trait bounds, with the bounds specified on type parameters of the impl block. I find this unhelpful because closely related methods, like `unwrap_or` and `unwrap_or_default`, end up disproportionately far apart in source code and rustdocs:
<pre>
impl<T> Option<T> {
pub fn unwrap_or(self, default: T) -> T {
...
}
<img alt="one eternity later" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1940490/147780325-ad4e01a4-c971-436e-bdf4-e755f2d35f15.jpg" width="750">
}
impl<T: Default> Option<T> {
pub fn unwrap_or_default(self) -> T {
...
}
}
</pre>
I'd prefer for method to be in as few impl blocks as possible, with the most logical grouping within each impl block. Any bounds needed can be written as `where` clauses on the method instead:
```rust
impl<T> Option<T> {
pub fn unwrap_or(self, default: T) -> T {
...
}
pub fn unwrap_or_default(self) -> T
where
T: Default,
{
...
}
}
```
*Warning: the end-to-end diff of this PR is computed confusingly by git / rendered confusingly by GitHub; it's practically impossible to review that way. I've broken the PR into commits that move small groups of methods for which git behaves better — these each should be easily individually reviewable.*
Track caller of slice split and swap
Improves error location for `slice.split_at*()` and `slice.swap()`.
These are generic inline functions, so the `#[track_caller]` on them is free — only changes a value of an argument already passed to panicking code.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #84083 (Clarify the guarantees that ThreadId does and doesn't make.)
- #91593 (Remove unnecessary bounds for some Hash{Map,Set} methods)
- #92297 (Reduce compile time of rustbuild)
- #92332 (Add test for where clause order)
- #92438 (Enforce formatting for rustc_codegen_cranelift)
- #92463 (Remove pronunciation guide from Vec<T>)
- #92468 (Emit an error for `--cfg=)`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove unnecessary bounds for some Hash{Map,Set} methods
This PR moves `HashMap::{into_keys,into_values,retain}` and `HashSet::retain` from `impl` blocks with `K: Eq + Hash, S: BuildHasher` into the blocks without them. It doesn't seem to me there is any reason these methods need to be bounded by that. This change brings `HashMap::{into_keys,into_values}` on par with `HashMap::{keys,values,values_mut}` which are not bounded either.
Clarify the guarantees that ThreadId does and doesn't make.
The existing documentation does not spell out whether `ThreadId`s are unique during the lifetime of a thread or of a process. I had to examine the source code to realise (pleasingly!) that they're unique for the lifetime of a process. That seems worth documenting clearly, as it's a strong guarantee.
Examining the way `ThreadId`s are created also made me realise that the `as_u64` method on `ThreadId` could be a trap for the unwary on those platforms where the platform's notion of a thread identifier is also a 64 bit integer (particularly if they happen to use a similar identifier scheme to `ThreadId`). I therefore think it's worth being even clearer that there's no relationship between the two.
Remove CommandEnv::apply
It's not being used and uses unsound set_var and remove_var functions. This is an internal function that isn't exported (even with `process_internals` feature), so this shouldn't break anything.
Also see #92365. Note that this isn't the only use of those methods in standard library, so that particular pull request will need more changes than just this to work (in particular, `test_capture_env_at_spawn` is using `set_var` and `remove_var`).
Implement split_at_spare_mut without Deref to a slice so that the spare slice is valid
~I'm not sure I understand what's going on here correctly. And I'm pretty sure this safety comment needs to be changed. I'm just referring to the same thing that `as_mut_ptr_range` does.~ (Thanks `@RalfJung` for the guidance and clearing things up)
I tried to run https://github.com/rust-lang/miri-test-libstd on alloc with -Zmiri-track-raw-pointers, and got a failure on the test `vec::test_extend_from_within`.
I minimized the test failure into this program:
```rust
#![feature(vec_split_at_spare)]
fn main() {
Vec::<i32>::with_capacity(1).split_at_spare_mut();
}
```
The problem is that the existing implementation is actually getting a pointer range where both pointers are derived from the initialized region of the Vec's allocation, but we need the second one to be valid for the region between len and capacity. (thanks Ralf for clearing this up)
Add try_reserve and try_reserve_exact for OsString
Add `try_reserve` and `try_reserve_exact` for OsString.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91789
I will squash the commits after PR is ready to merge.
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
It appears `find_max_slow` comes from the BinaryHeap docs, where the
try_reserve example is a slow implementation of find_max. It has no
relevance to this code in OsString though.
The crate name is already set in Cargo.toml. The comment says there is
some logic in the compiler that reads #![crate_name] and not
--crate-name, but I can't find it. Removing it seems to work fine.
Remove `maybe_uninit_extra` feature from Vec docs
In `Vec`, two doc tests are using `MaybeUninit::write` , stabilized in 1.55. This makes docs' usage of `maybe_uninit_extra` feature unnecessary.
