Report text_direction_codepoint_in_literal when parsing
The lint is now reported in code that gets removed/modified/duplicated by macro expansion, and spans are more accurate so we don't get ICEs from trying to split a span in the middle of a character.
This removes support for lint level attributes for `text_direction_codepoint_in_literal` except at the crate level, I don't think that there's an easy way around this when the lint can be reported on code that's removed by `cfg` or that is only in the input of a macro.
Fixes#140281
Use `cfg_attr_trace` in AST with a placeholder attribute for accurate suggestion
In rust-lang/rust#138515, we insert a placeholder attribute so that checks for attributes can still know about the placement of `cfg` attributes. When we suggest removing items with `cfg_attr`s (fixrust-lang/rust#56328) and make them verbose. We tweak the wording of the existing "unused `extern crate`" lint.
```
warning: unused `extern crate`
--> $DIR/removing-extern-crate.rs:9:1
|
LL | extern crate removing_extern_crate as foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ unused
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/removing-extern-crate.rs:6:9
|
LL | #![warn(rust_2018_idioms)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: `#[warn(unused_extern_crates)]` implied by `#[warn(rust_2018_idioms)]`
help: remove the unused `extern crate`
|
LL - #[cfg_attr(test, macro_use)]
LL - extern crate removing_extern_crate as foo;
|
```
r? `@petrochenkov`
try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
Specifically `TyAlias`, `Enum`, `Struct`, `Union`. So the fields match
the textual order in the source code.
The interesting part of the change is in
`compiler/rustc_hir/src/hir.rs`. The rest is extremely mechanical
refactoring.
PR 138515, we insert a placeholder attribute so that checks for attributes can still know about the placement of `cfg` attributes. When we suggest removing items with `cfg_attr`s (fix Issue 56328) and make them verbose. We tweak the wording of the existing "unused `extern crate`" lint.
```
warning: unused extern crate
--> $DIR/removing-extern-crate.rs:9:1
|
LL | extern crate removing_extern_crate as foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ unused
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/removing-extern-crate.rs:6:9
|
LL | #![warn(rust_2018_idioms)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: `#[warn(unused_extern_crates)]` implied by `#[warn(rust_2018_idioms)]`
help: remove the unused `extern crate`
|
LL - #[cfg_attr(test, macro_use)]
LL - extern crate removing_extern_crate as foo;
LL +
|
```
Make two transmute-related MIR lints into HIR lint
Make `PTR_TO_INTEGER_TRANSMUTE_IN_CONSTS` (rust-lang/rust#130540) and `UNNECESSARY_TRANSMUTES` (rust-lang/rust#136083) into "normal" HIR-based lints.
Funny enough this came up in the review of the latter (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136083#issuecomment-2614301413), but I guess it just was overlooked.
But anywyas, there's no reason for these to be MIR lints; in fact, it makes the suggestions for them a bit more complicated than necessary.
Note that there's probably a few more simplifications and improvements to be done here. Follow-ups can be done in a separate PR, especially if they're about the messaging and suggestions themselves, which I didn't write.
Make check-cfg diagnostics work in `#[doc(cfg(..))]`
This PR makes it so that the check-cfg `unexpected_cfgs` lint, is correctly emitted in `rustdoc`'s `#[doc(cfg(..))]`.
This is achieved by adding a custom trait to `cfg_matches` (the method that emits the lint) which permits `rustc` and `rustdoc` to each have their way to emitting lints (via buffered lints/AST for `rustc` and via `TyCtxt`/HIR for `rustdoc`).
The reason this is required is because buffered lints operates on the AST but `rustdoc` uses the HIR and by the time `rustdoc` calls `cfg_matches` we are way passed the point where buffered lints have been drain and emitted.
Best reviewed commit by commit.
r? `@jieyouxu` (for the compiler part)
r? `@GuillaumeGomez` (for the rustdoc part)
Rename `{GenericArg,Term}::unpack()` to `kind()`
A well-deserved rename IMO.
r? `@oli-obk` or `@lcnr` (or anyone)
cc `@rust-lang/types,` but I'd be surprised if this is controversial.
Improve `ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons` lint compare diagnostics
This PR improves the `ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons` lint compare diagnostics: `cmp`/`partial_cmp`, but also the operators `<`/`>`/`>=`/`<=`, by:
1. removing the reference to `std::ptr::addr_eq` which only works for equality
2. and adding an `#[expect]` suggestion for keeping the current behavior
Fixesrust-lang/rust#141510
Fix `unused_braces` lint suggestion when encountering attributes
This PR fixes the `unused_braces` lint suggestion when encountering attributes by not removing them in the suggestion.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#141549
make `rustc_attr_parsing` less dominant in the rustc crate graph
It has/had a glob re-export of `rustc_attr_data_structures`, which is a crate much lower in the graph, and a lot of crates were using it *just* (or *mostly*) for that re-export, while they can rely on `rustc_attr_data_structures` directly.
Previous graph:
Graph with this PR:
The first commit keeps the re-export, and just changes the dependency if possible. The second commit is the "breaking change" which removes the re-export, and "explicitly" adds the `rustc_attr_data_structures` dependency where needed. It also switches over some src/tools/*.
The second commit is actually a lot more involved than I expected. Please let me know if it's a better idea to back it out and just keep the first commit.
Stage0 bootstrap update
This PR [follows the release process](https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#master-bootstrap-update-tuesday) to update the stage0 compiler.
The only thing of note is 58651d1b31, which was flagged by clippy as a correctness fix. I think allowing that lint in our case makes sense, but it's worth to have a second pair of eyes on it.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Use span before macro expansion in lint for-loops-over-falibles
Fixes#140747
I think there are going to be a lot of cases where macros are expanded in the compiler resulting in span offsets, and I'd like to know how that's typically handled. Does it have to be handled specially every time?
The documentation is talking about other way using only raw pointers, but the example was use `std::slice::from_raw_parts_mut` which also create a reference. `std::ptr::slice_from_raw_parts_mut` should be used instead, and it also highlights the benefit of raw pointer manipulation compared to dereference, as the function doesn't need to be unsafe anymore.
Moreover, [`unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/rust-2024/unsafe-op-in-unsafe-fn.html) warning has been enabled since Edition 2024, so I've updated the examples to use unsafe blocks.
handle paren in macro expand for let-init-else expr
Fixes#131655
This PR modifies the codegen logic of the macro expansion within `let-init-else` expression:
- Before: The expression `let xxx = (mac! {}) else {}` expands to `let xxx = (expanded_ast) else {}`.
- After: The same expression expands to `let xxx = expanded_ast else {}`.
An alternative solution to this issue could involve handling the source code directly when encountering unused parentheses in `let-init-else` expressions. However, this approach might be more cumbersome due to the absence of the necessary data structure.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Check bare function idents for non snake-case name
This PR adds the check required to lint on bare function idents for non snake-case name.
Reported at #140089.
cc `@theemathas`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #140056 (Fix a wrong error message in 2024 edition)
- #140220 (Fix detection of main function if there are expressions around it)
- #140249 (Remove `weak` alias terminology)
- #140316 (Introduce `BoxMarker` to improve pretty-printing correctness)
- #140347 (ci: clean more disk space in codebuild)
- #140349 (ci: use aws codebuild for the `dist-x86_64-linux` job)
- #140379 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove `weak` alias terminology
I find the "weak" alias terminology to be quite confusing. It implies the existence of "strong" aliases (which do not exist) and I'm not really sure what about weak aliases is "weak". I much prefer "free alias" as the term. I think it's much more obvious what it means as "free function" is a well defined term that already exists in rust.
It's also a little confusing given "weak alias" is already a term in linker/codegen spaces which are part of the compiler too. Though I'm not particularly worried about that as it's usually very obvious if you're talking about the type system or not lol. I'm also currently trying to write documentation about aliases and it's somewhat awkward/confusing to be talking about *weak* aliases, when I'm not really sure what the basis for that as the term actually *is*.
I would also be happy to just find out there's a nice meaning behind calling them "weak" aliases :-)
r? `@oli-obk`
maybe we want a types MCP to decide on a specific naming here? or maybe we think its just too late to go back on this naming decision ^^'
Implement a lint for implicit autoref of raw pointer dereference - take 2
*[t-lang nomination comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123239#issuecomment-2727551097)*
This PR aims at implementing a lint for implicit autoref of raw pointer dereference, it is based on #103735 with suggestion and improvements from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103735#issuecomment-1370420305.
The goal is to catch cases like this, where the user probably doesn't realise it just created a reference.
```rust
pub struct Test {
data: [u8],
}
pub fn test_len(t: *const Test) -> usize {
unsafe { (*t).data.len() } // this calls <[T]>::len(&self)
}
```
Since #103735 already went 2 times through T-lang, where they T-lang ended-up asking for a more restricted version (which is what this PR does), I would prefer this PR to be reviewed first before re-nominating it for T-lang.
----
Compared to the PR it is as based on, this PR adds 3 restrictions on the outer most expression, which must either be:
1. A deref followed by any non-deref place projection (that intermediate deref will typically be auto-inserted)
2. A method call annotated with `#[rustc_no_implicit_refs]`.
3. A deref followed by a `addr_of!` or `addr_of_mut!`. See bottom of post for details.
There are several points that are not 100% clear to me when implementing the modifications:
- ~~"4. Any number of automatically inserted deref/derefmut calls." I as never able to trigger this. Am I missing something?~~ Fixed
- Are "index" and "field" enough?
----
cc `@JakobDegen` `@WaffleLapkin`
r? `@RalfJung`
try-job: dist-various-1
try-job: dist-various-2
Avoid re-interning in `LateContext::get_def_path`
The def path printer in `get_def_path` essentially calls `Symbol::intern(&symbol.to_string())` for simple symbols in a path. This accounts for ~30% of the runtime of get_def_path.
We can avoid this by simply appending the symbol directly when available.
This updates the lint-docs tool to default to the 2024 edition. The lint
docs are supposed to illustrate the code with the latest edition, and I
just forgot to update this in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133349.
Some docs needed to add the `edition` attribute since they were assuming
a particular edition, but were missing the explicit annotation.
The def path printer in `get_def_path` essentially calls
`Symbol::intern(&symbol.to_string())` for simple symbols in a path.
This accounts for ~30% of the runtime of get_def_path.
We can avoid this by simply appending the symbol directly when available.
