Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bors
0d439f8181 Auto merge of #108351 - petrochenkov:rmdit, r=cjgillot
rustc_middle: Remove trait `DefIdTree`

This trait was a way to generalize over both `TyCtxt` and `Resolver`, but now `Resolver` has access to `TyCtxt`, so this trait is no longer necessary.
2023-03-05 10:37:02 +00:00
Vadim Petrochenkov
c83553da31 rustc_middle: Remove trait DefIdTree
This trait was a way to generalize over both `TyCtxt` and `Resolver`, but now `Resolver` has access to `TyCtxt`, so this trait is no longer necessary.
2023-03-02 23:46:44 +04:00
Léo Lanteri Thauvin
bfe5189904 Revert "Stabilize #![feature(target_feature_11)]"
This reverts commit b379d216ee.
2023-03-02 13:41:17 +01:00
bors
b583ede652 Auto merge of #99767 - LeSeulArtichaut:stable-target-feature-11, r=estebank
Stabilize `#![feature(target_feature_11)]`

## Stabilization report

### Summary

Allows for safe functions to be marked with `#[target_feature]` attributes.

Functions marked with `#[target_feature]` are generally considered as unsafe functions: they are unsafe to call, cannot be assigned to safe function pointers, and don't implement the `Fn*` traits.

However, calling them from other `#[target_feature]` functions with a superset of features is safe.

```rust
// Demonstration function
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn avx2() {}

fn foo() {
    // Calling `avx2` here is unsafe, as we must ensure
    // that AVX is available first.
    unsafe {
        avx2();
    }
}

#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn bar() {
    // Calling `avx2` here is safe.
    avx2();
}
```

### Test cases

Tests for this feature can be found in [`src/test/ui/rfcs/rfc-2396-target_feature-11/`](b67ba9ba20/src/test/ui/rfcs/rfc-2396-target_feature-11/).

### Edge cases

- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73631

Closures defined inside functions marked with `#[target_feature]` inherit the target features of their parent function. They can still be assigned to safe function pointers and implement the appropriate `Fn*` traits.

```rust
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn qux() {
    let my_closure = || avx2(); // this call to `avx2` is safe
    let f: fn() = my_closure;
}
```

This means that in order to call a function with `#[target_feature]`, you must show that the target-feature is available while the function executes *and* for as long as whatever may escape from that function lives.

### Documentation

- Reference: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1181

---
cc tracking issue #69098
r? `@ghost`
2023-02-28 01:14:56 +00:00
Wesley Norris
19714385e0 Add kernel-address sanitizer support for freestanding targets 2023-02-14 20:54:25 -05:00
Vadim Petrochenkov
a9c8a5c025 ast: Optimize list and value extraction primitives for attributes
It's not necessary to convert the whole attribute into a meta item to extract something specific
2023-02-01 22:35:02 +04:00
bors
11d96b5930 Auto merge of #107257 - inquisitivecrystal:ffi-attr, r=davidtwco
Strengthen validation of FFI attributes

Previously, `codegen_attrs` validated the attributes `#[ffi_pure]`, `#[ffi_const]`, and `#[ffi_returns_twice]` to make sure that they were only used on foreign functions. However, this validation was insufficient in two ways:

1. `codegen_attrs` only sees items for which code must be generated, so it was unable to raise errors when the attribute was incorrectly applied to macros and the like.
2. the validation code only checked that the item with the attr was foreign, but not that it was a foreign function, allowing these attributes to be applied to foreign statics as well.

This PR moves the validation to `check_attr`, which sees all items. It additionally changes the validation to ensure that the attribute's target is `Target::ForeignFunction`, only allowing the attributes on foreign functions and not foreign statics. Because these attributes are unstable, there is no risk for backwards compatibility. The changes also ending up making the code much easier to read.

This PR is best reviewed commit by commit. Additionally, I was considering moving the tests to the `attribute` subdirectory, to get them out of the general UI directory. I could do that as part of this PR or a follow-up, as the reviewer prefers.

CC: #58328, #58329
2023-02-01 11:37:24 +00:00
Léo Lanteri Thauvin
b379d216ee Stabilize #![feature(target_feature_11)] 2023-02-01 08:53:02 +01:00
Kyle Matsuda
c2414dfaa4 change fn_sig query to use EarlyBinder; remove bound_fn_sig query; add EarlyBinder to fn_sig in metadata 2023-01-26 20:28:25 -07:00
Kyle Matsuda
e982971ff2 replace usages of fn_sig query with bound_fn_sig 2023-01-26 20:15:36 -07:00
inquisitivecrystal
05b7cc8370 Move FFI attribute validation to check_attr 2023-01-24 02:19:04 -08:00
Maybe Waffle
6a28fb42a8 Remove double spaces after dots in comments 2023-01-17 08:09:33 +00:00
inquisitivecrystal
47b6426777 Check fn_sig in more situations per review 2022-12-15 23:55:42 -08:00
inquisitivecrystal
9b312737c0 Don't perform invalid checks in codegen_attrs
Some attributes are only valid on function items. When checking these
attributes, codegen_attrs previously sometimes called `fn_sig` on the
item they were attached to without first ensuring that the item was a
function. This led to an ICE (#105594), since `fn_sig` can
only be called on functions.

After this change, we skip calling `fn_sig` if the item the attribute is
attached to must be a function but invalidly isn't, because `check_attr`
will reject such cases without codegen_attrs's intervention.
2022-12-13 22:52:13 -08:00
Michael Goulet
a8a45100a0 Move some codegen-y methods from rustc_hir_analysis::collect -> rustc_codegen_ssa 2022-12-13 05:01:36 +00:00