It lints against features that are inteded to be internal to the
compiler and standard library. Implements MCP #596.
We allow `internal_features` in the standard library and compiler as those
use many features and this _is_ the standard library from the "internal to the compiler and
standard library" after all.
Marking some features as internal wasn't exactly the most scientific approach, I just marked some
mostly obvious features. While there is a categorization in the macro,
it's not very well upheld (should probably be fixed in another PR).
We always pass `-Ainternal_features` in the testsuite
About 400 UI tests and several other tests use internal features.
Instead of throwing the attribute on each one, just always allow them.
There's nothing wrong with testing internal features^^
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #111741 (Use `ObligationCtxt` in custom type ops)
- #111840 (Expose more information in `get_body_with_borrowck_facts`)
- #111876 (Roll compiler_builtins to 0.1.92)
- #111912 (Use `Option::is_some_and` and `Result::is_ok_and` in the compiler )
- #111915 (libtest: Improve error when missing `-Zunstable-options`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
As I've been trying to replace a `Vec` with an `IndexVec`, having `last` exist on both but returning very different types makes the transition a bit awkward -- the errors are later, where you get things like "there's no `ty` method on `mir::Field`" rather than a more localized error like "hey, there's no `last` on `IndexVec`".
So I propose renaming `last` to `last_index` to help distinguish `Vec::last`, which returns an element, and `IndexVec::last_index`, which returns an index.
(Similarly, `Iterator::last` also returns an element, not an index.)
Convert all the crates that have had their diagnostic migration
completed (except save_analysis because that will be deleted soon and
apfloat because of the licensing problem).
Remove the `..` from the body, only a few invocations used it and it's
inconsistent with rust syntax.
Use `;` instead of `,` between consts. As the Rust syntax gods inteded.
Stabilize bench_black_box
This PR stabilize `feature(bench_black_box)`.
```rust
pub fn black_box<T>(dummy: T) -> T;
```
The FCP was completed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64102.
`@rustbot` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
On later stages, the feature is already stable.
Result of running:
rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
Fix cloning from a BitSet with a different domain size
The previous implementation incorrectly assumed that the
number of words in a bit set is equal to the domain size.
The new implementation delegates to `Vec::clone_from` which
is specialized for `Copy` elements.
Fixes#99006.
The previous implementation incorrectly assumed that the
number of words in a bit set is equal to the domain size.
The new implementation delegates to `Vec::clone_from` which
is specialized for `Copy` elements.
Remove dereferencing of Box from codegen
Through #94043, #94414, #94873, and #95328, I've been fixing issues caused by Box being treated like a pointer when it is not a pointer. However, these PRs just introduced special cases for Box. This PR removes those special cases and instead transforms a deref of Box into a deref of the pointer it contains.
Hopefully, this is the end of the Box<T, A> ICEs.
`BitSet` related perf improvements
This commit makes two changes:
1. Changes `MaybeLiveLocals` to use `ChunkedBitSet`
2. Overrides the `fold` method for the iterator for `ChunkedBitSet`
I have local benchmarks verifying that each of these changes individually yield significant perf improvements to #96451 . I'm hoping this will be true outside of that context too. If that is not the case, I'll try to gate things on where they help as needed
r? `@nnethercote` who I believe was working on closely related things, cc `@tmiasko` because of the destprop pr
optimize `superset` method of `IntervalSet`
Given that intervals in the `IntervalSet` are sorted and strictly separated( it means the `end` of the previous interval will not be equal to the `start` of the next interval), we can reduce the complexity of the `superset` method from O(NMlogN) to O(2N) (N is the number of intervals and M is the length of each interval)
