And while doing the updates for that, also uses `FieldIdx` in `ProjectionKind::Field` and `TypeckResults::field_indices`.
There's more places that could use it (like `rustc_const_eval` and `LayoutS`), but I tried to keep this PR from exploding to *even more* places.
Part 2/? of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/606
stop special-casing `'static` in evaluation
fixes#102360
I have no idea whether this actually removed all places where `'static` matters. Without canonicalization it's very easy to accidentally rely on `'static` again. Blocked on changing the `order_dependent_trait_objects` future-compat lint to a hard error
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Don't elaborate non-obligations into obligations
It's suspicious to elaborate a `PolyTraitRef` or `Predicate` into an `Obligation`, since the former does not have a param-env associated with it, but the latter does. This is a footgun that, while not being misused *currently* in the compiler, easily could be misused by someone less familiar with the elaborator's inner workings.
This PR just changes the API -- ideally, the elaborator wouldn't even have to deal with obligations if we're not elaborating obligations, but that would require a bit more abstraction than I could be bothered with today.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108541 (Suppress `opaque_hidden_inferred_bound` for nested RPITs)
- #109137 (resolve: Querify most cstore access methods (subset 2))
- #109380 (add `known-bug` test for unsoundness issue)
- #109462 (Make alias-eq have a relation direction (and rename it to alias-relate))
- #109475 (Simpler checked shifts in MIR building)
- #109504 (Stabilize `arc_into_inner` and `rc_into_inner`.)
- #109506 (make param bound vars visibly bound vars with -Zverbose)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make alias-eq have a relation direction (and rename it to alias-relate)
Emitting an "alias-eq" is too strict in some situations, since we don't always want strict equality between a projection and rigid ty. Adds a relation direction.
* I could probably just reuse this [`RelationDir`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_infer/infer/combine/enum.RelationDir.html) -- happy to uplift that struct into middle and use that instead, but I didn't feel compelled to... 🤷
* Some of the matching in `compute_alias_relate_goal` is a bit verbose -- I guess I could simplify it by using [`At::relate`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_infer/infer/at/struct.At.html#method.relate) and mapping the relation-dir to a variance.
* Alternatively, I coulld simplify things by making more helper functions on `EvalCtxt` (e.g. `EvalCtxt::relate_with_direction(T, T)` that also does the nested goal registration). No preference.
r? ```@lcnr``` cc ```@BoxyUwU``` though boxy can claim it if she wants
NOTE: first commit is all the changes, the second is just renaming stuff
Make NLL Type Relating Eager
We previously instantiated bound regions in nll type relating lazily. Making this eager is more consistent with how we handle type relating in [`higher_ranked_sub`](0a3b557d52/compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/higher_ranked/mod.rs (L28)) and should allow us to short circuit in case there's structural equality.
new solver cleanup + implement coherence
the cleanup:
- change `Certainty::unify_and` to consider ambig + overflow to be ambig
- rename `trait_candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of` to `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of`
- remove outdated fixme
For coherence I mostly just add an ambiguous candidate if the current trait ref is unknowable. I am doing the same for reservation impl where I also just add an ambiguous candidate.
a general type system cleanup
removes the helper functions `traits::fully_solve_X` as they add more complexity then they are worth. It's confusing which of these helpers should be used in which context.
changes the way we deal with overflow to always add depth in `evaluate_predicates_recursively`. It may make sense to actually fully transition to not have `recursion_depth` on obligations but that's probably a bit too much for this PR.
also removes some other small - and imo unnecessary - helpers.
r? types
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #96391 (Windows: make `Command` prefer non-verbatim paths)
- #108164 (Drop all messages in bounded channel when destroying the last receiver)
- #108729 (fix: modify the condition that `resolve_imports` stops)
- #109336 (Constrain const vars to error if const types are mismatched)
- #109403 (Avoid ICE of attempt to add with overflow in emitter)
- #109415 (Refactor `handle_missing_lit`.)
- #109441 (Only implement Fn* traits for extern "Rust" safe function pointers and items)
- #109446 (Do not suggest bounds restrictions for synthesized RPITITs)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Constrain const vars to error if const types are mismatched
When equating two consts of different types, if either are const variables, constrain them to the correct const error kind.
This helps us avoid "successfully" matching a const against an impl signature but leaving unconstrained const vars, which will lead to incremental ICEs when we call const-eval queries during const projection.
Fixes#109296
The second commit in the stack fixes a regression in the first commit where we end up mentioning `[const error]` in an impl overlap error message. I think the error message changes for the better, but I could implement alternative strategies to avoid this without delaying the overlap error message...
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Add note for mismatched types because of circular dependencies
If you have crate A with a dependency on crate B, and crate B with a dev-dependency on A, then you might see "mismatched types" errors on types that seem to be equal. This PR adds a note that explains that the types are different, because crate B is compiled twice, one time with `cfg(test)` and one time without.
I haven't found a good way to create circular dependencies in UI tests, so I abused the incremental tests instead. As a bonus, incremental tests support "cpass" now.
related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/22750
- only borrow the refcell once per loop
- avoid complex matches to reduce branch paths in the hot loop
- use a by-ref fast path that avoids mutations at the expense of having false negatives
Install projection from RPITIT to default trait method opaque correctly
1. For new lowering strategy `-Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty`, install the correct default trait method projection predicates (RPITIT -> opaque). This makes default trait body tests pass!
2. Fix two WF-checking bugs -- first, we want to make sure that we're always looking for an opaque type in `check_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_bounds`. That's because the RPITIT projections are normalized to opaques during wfcheck. Second, fix RPITIT's param-envs by not adding the projection predicates that we install on trait methods to make default RPITITs work -- I left a comment why.
3. Also, just a small drive-by for `rustc_on_unimplemented`. Not sure if it affects any tests, but can't hurt.
r? ````@spastorino,```` based off of #109140
make `define_opaque_types` fully explicit
based on the idea of #108389. Moved `define_opaque_types` into the actual operations, e.g. `eq`, instead of `infcx.at` because normalization doesn't use `define_opaque_types` and even creates it's own `At` with a different `define_opaque_types` internally.
Somewhat surprisingly, coherence actually relies on `DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes` for soundness which was revealed because I've incorrectly used `DefineOpaqueTypes::No` in `equate_impl_headers`. It feels concerning that even though this is the case, we still sometimes use `DefineOpaqueTypes::No` in coherence. I did not look into this as part of this PR as it is purely changing the structure of the code without changing behavior in any way.
r? ```@oli-obk```
