I am working on fs support for UEFI [0], which similar to windows has prefix
components, but is not quite same as Windows. It also seems that Prefix
is tied closely to Windows and cannot really be extended [1].
This PR just tries to remove coupling between Prefix and absolute path
checking to allow platforms to provide there own implementation to check
if a path is absolute or not.
I am not sure if any platform other than windows currently uses Prefix,
so I have kept the path.prefix().is_some() check in most cases.
[0]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135368
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52331#issuecomment-2492796137
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org>
Since the stabilization in #127679 has reached stage0, 1.82-beta, we can
start using `&raw` freely, and even the soft-deprecated `ptr::addr_of!`
and `ptr::addr_of_mut!` can stop allowing the unstable feature.
I intentionally did not change any documentation or tests, but the rest
of those macro uses are all now using `&raw const` or `&raw mut` in the
standard library.
Improve std::Path's Hash quality by avoiding prefix collisions
This adds a bit rotation to the already existing state so that the same sequence of characters chunked at different offsets into separate path components results in different hashes.
The tests are from #127255Closes#127254
These changes bring it closer to other standard library documentation
and, in particular, `std::fs::canonicalize`, which it will often be
compared with.
* Add `# Platform-specific behavior` section, with content moved from
Examples section.
* Create `# Errors` section.
* Phrase error description to allow future platforms to have new
syntactic errors, rather than only emptiness.
* Add missing commas.
* Indent example code 4 spaces.
Panic if `PathBuf::set_extension` would add a path separator
This is likely never intended and potentially a security vulnerability if it happens.
I'd guess that it's mostly literal strings that are passed to this function in practice, so I'm guessing this doesn't break anyone.
CC #125060
This is likely never intended and potentially a security vulnerability
if it happens.
I'd guess that it's mostly literal strings that are passed to this
function in practice, so I'm guessing this doesn't break anyone.
CC #125060
Document overrides of `clone_from()` in core/std
As mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96979#discussion_r1379502413
Specifically, when an override doesn't just forward to an inner type, document the behavior and that it's preferred over simply assigning a clone of source. Also, change instances where the second parameter is "other" to "source".
I reused some of the wording over and over for similar impls, but I'm not sure that the wording is actually *good*. Would appreciate feedback about that.
Also, now some of these seem to provide pretty specific guarantees about behavior (e.g. will reuse the exact same allocation iff the len is the same), but I was basing it off of the docs for [`Box::clone_from`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.75.0/std/boxed/struct.Box.html#method.clone_from-1) - I'm not sure if providing those strong guarantees is actually good or not.
If you take a quick glance at the documentation for Path::ancestors, the unwraps take the natural focus. Potentially indicating that ancestors might panic.
In the reworked version I've also moved the link with parent returning None and that the iterator will always yield &self to before the yield examples.
Changes the example from using the qualified path of PathBuf with an import. This is what's done in all other Path/PathBuf examples and makes the code look a bit cleaner.
Specifically, when an override doesn't just forward to an inner type,
document the behavior and that it's preferred over simply assigning
a clone of source. Also, change instances where the second parameter is
"other" to "source".
Help with common API confusion, like asking for `push` when the data structure really has `append`.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `size` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs:17:7
|
LL | x.size();
| ^^^^
|
help: you might have meant to use `len`
|
LL | x.len();
| ~~~
help: there is a method with a similar name
|
LL | x.resize();
| ~~~~~~
```
#59450
Add `display` method to `OsStr` for lossy display of an `OsStr` which may contain invalid unicode.
Invalid Unicode sequences are replaced with `U+FFFD REPLACEMENT CHARACTER`.
This change also makes the `std::ffi::os_str` module public.
