Add lint to check for boolean comparison in assert macro calls
This PR adds a lint to check if an assert macro is using a boolean as "comparison value". For example:
```rust
assert_eq!("a".is_empty(), false);
```
Could be rewritten as:
```rust
assert!(!"a".is_empty());
```
PS: The dev guidelines are amazing. Thanks a lot for writing them!
changelog: Add `bool_assert_comparison` lint
useless use of format! should return function directly
fixes#7066
changelog: [`useless_format`] wraps the content in the braces when it's needed.
r? `@giraffate`
Add `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind`
I noticed a significant portion of the uses of `ErrorKind::Other` in std is for unsupported operations.
The notion that a specific operation is not available on a target (and will thus never succeed) seems semantically distinct enough from just "an unspecified error occurred", which is why I am proposing to add the variant `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind`.
**Implementation**:
The following variant will be added to `std::io::ErrorKind`:
```rust
/// This operation is unsupported on this platform.
Unsupported
```
`std::io::ErrorKind::Unsupported` is an error returned when a given operation is not supported on a platform, and will thus never succeed; there is no way for the software to recover. It will be used instead of `Other` where appropriate, e.g. on wasm for file and network operations.
`decode_error_kind` will be updated to decode operating system errors to `Unsupported`:
- Unix and VxWorks: `libc::ENOSYS`
- Windows: `c::ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED`
- WASI: `wasi::ERRNO_NOSYS`
**Stability**:
This changes the kind of error returned by some functions on some platforms, which I think is not covered by the stability guarantees of the std? User code could depend on this behavior, expecting `ErrorKind::Other`, however the docs already mention:
> Errors that are `Other` now may move to a different or a new `ErrorKind` variant in the future. It is not recommended to match an error against `Other` and to expect any additional characteristics, e.g., a specific `Error::raw_os_error` return value.
The most recent variant added to `ErrorKind` was `UnexpectedEof` in `1.6.0` (almost 5 years ago), but `ErrorKind` is marked as `#[non_exhaustive]` and the docs warn about exhaustively matching on it, so adding a new variant per se should not be a breaking change.
The variant `Unsupported` itself could be marked as `#[unstable]`, however, because this PR also immediately uses this new variant and changes the errors returned by functions I'm inclined to agree with the others in this thread that the variant should be insta-stabilized.
Allow allman style braces in `suspicious_else_formatting`
fixes: #3864
Indentation checks could be added as well, but the lint already doesn't check for it.
changelog: Allow allman style braces in `suspicious_else_formatting`
Fixing FPs for the `branches_sharing_code` lint
Fixes#7053Fixes#7054
And an additional CSS adjustment to support dark mode for every inline code. It currently only works in paragraphs, which was an oversight on my part 😅. [Current Example](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#blacklisted_name)
This also includes ~50 lines of doc comments and is therefor not as big as the changes would indicate. 🐧
---
changelog: none
All of these bugs were introduced in this dev version and are therefor not worth a change log entry.
r? `@phansch`
cc: `@camsteffen` since you have a pretty good overview of the `SpanlessEq` implementation 🙃
Add `cloned_instead_of_copied` lint
Don't go cloning all willy-nilly.
Featuring a new `get_iterator_item_ty` util!
changelog: Add cloned_instead_of_copied lint
Closes#3870
Fix: redundant_pattern_matching drop order
Fixes#5746
A note about the change in drop order is added when the scrutinee (or any temporary in the expression) isn't known to be safe to drop in any order (i.e. doesn't implement the `Drop` trait, or contain such a type). There is a whitelist for some `std` types, but it's incomplete. Currently just `Vec<_>`, `Box<_>`, `Rc<_>` and `Arc<_>`, but only if the contained type is also safe to drop in any order.
Another lint for when the drop order changes could be added as allowed by default, but the drop order requirement is pretty subtle in this case. I think the note added to the lint should be enough to make someone think before applying the change.
changelog: Added a note to `redundant_pattern_matching` when the change in drop order might matter
Improve `map_entry` suggestion
fixes: #5176fixes: #4674fixes: #4664fixes: #1450
Still need to handle the value returned by `insert` correctly.
changelog: Improve `map_entry` suggestion. Will now suggest `or_insert`, `insert_with` or `match _.entry(_)` as appopriate.
changelog: Fix `map_entry` false positives where the entry api can't be used. e.g. when the map is used for multiple things.
Don't allow adjustments for `manual_map`
fixes: #7077
The other option here would be to add the return type to the closure. It would be fine for simple types, but longer types can be rather unwieldy. Could also implement the adjustment manually.
changelog: Don't lint `manual_map` when type adjustments are added. e.g. autoderef
Fix false positives where the map is used before inserting into the map.
Fix false positives where two insertions happen.
Suggest using `if let Entry::Vacant(e) = _.entry(_)` when `or_insert` might be a semantic change
tabs_in_doc_comments: Fix ICE due to char indexing
This is a quick-fix for an ICE in `tabs_in_doc_comments`. The problem
was that we we're indexing into possibly multi-byte characters, such as '位'.
More specifically `get_chunks_of_tabs` was returning indices into
multi-byte characters. Those were passed on to a `Span` creation that
then caused the ICE.
This fix makes sure that we don't return indices that point inside a
multi-byte character. *However*, we are still iterating over unicode
codepoints, not grapheme clusters. So a seemingly single character like y̆ ,
which actually consists of two codepoints, will probably still cause
incorrect spans in the output. But I don't think we handle those cases
anywhere in Clippy currently?
Fixes#5835
changelog: Fix ICE in `tabs_in_doc_comments`
Fix FP in `wrong_self_convention` lint
Previously, this lint didn't check into impl block when it was implementing a trait.
Recent improvements (#6924) have moved this check and some impl blocks are now checked but they shouldn't, such as in #7032.
Fixes#7032
changelog: Fix FP when not taking `self` in impl block for `wrong_self_convention` lint
Deprecate `filter_map`
Since #6591, `filter_map` does not even lint `filter().map()`. The cases that are still linted make no sense IMO. So this just removes/deprecates it.
changelog: Deprecate `filter_map` lint
Closes#3424Fixes#7050
Fix FP in `single_component_path_imports` lint
Fix FP in `single_component_path_imports` lint when the import is reused with `self`, like in `use self::module`.
Fixes#5210
changelog: none
Invalid null usage v2
This is continuation of #6192 after inactivity.
I plan to move paths into the compiler as diagnostic items after this is merged.
fixes#1703
changelog: none
consider mutability on useless_vec suggestions
fixes#7035
changelog: Now the suggested by `useless_vec` considers mutability to suggest either `&[]`, as before, or `&mut []` if the used reference is mutable.
This is a quick-fix for an ICE in `tabs_in_doc_comments`. The problem
was that we we're indexing into possibly multi-byte characters, such as '位'.
More specifically `get_chunks_of_tabs` was returning indices into
multi-byte characters. Those were passed on to a `Span` creation that
then caused the ICE.
This fix makes sure that we don't return indices that point inside a
multi-byte character. *However*, we are still iterating over unicode
codepoints, not grapheme clusters. So a seemingly single character like y̆ ,
which actually consists of two codepoints, will probably still cause
incorrect spans in the output.
Don't trigger `same_item_push` if the vec is used in the loop body
fixes#6987
changelog: `same_item_push`: Don't trigger if the `vec` is used in the loop body
fix `missing_panics_doc` not detecting `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!`
fixes#6997
changelog: `missing_panics_doc` detects `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!`
---
searching for `assert_eq!` and `assert_ne!` in `FindPanicUnwrap`
* Added expression check for shared_code_in_if_blocks
* Finishing touches for the shared_code_in_if_blocks lint
* Applying PR suggestions
* Update lints yay
* Moved test into subfolder
Fix `redundant_clone` fp
fixes: #5973fixes: #5595fixes: #6998
changelog: Fix `redundant_clone` fp where the cloned value is modified while the clone is in use.
Lint: filter(Option::is_some).map(Option::unwrap)
Fixes#6061
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog:
* add new lint for filter(Option::is_some).map(Option::unwrap)
First Rust PR, so I'm sure I've violated some idioms. Happy to change anything.
I'm getting one test failure locally -- a stderr diff for `compile_test`. I'm having a hard time seeing how I could be causing it, so I'm tentatively opening this in the hopes that it's an artifact of my local setup against `rustc`. Hoping it can at least still be reviewed in the meantime.
I'm gathering that since this is a method lint, and `.filter(...).map(...)` is already checked, the means of implementation needs to be a little different, so I didn't exactly follow the setup boilerplate. My way of checking for method calls seems a little too direct (ie, "is the second element of the expression literally the path for `Option::is_some`?"), but it seems like that's how some other lints work, so I went with it. I'm assuming we're not concerned about, eg, closures that just end up equivalent to `Option::is_some` by eta reduction.
