Add intrinsics `fmuladd{f16,f32,f64,f128}`. This computes `(a * b) +
c`, to be fused if the code generator determines that (i) the target
instruction set has support for a fused operation, and (ii) that the
fused operation is more efficient than the equivalent, separate pair
of `mul` and `add` instructions.
https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-fmuladd-intrinsic
MIRI support is included for f32 and f64.
The codegen_cranelift uses the `fma` function from libc, which is a
correct implementation, but without the desired performance semantic. I
think this requires an update to cranelift to expose a suitable
instruction in its IR.
I have not tested with codegen_gcc, but it should behave the same
way (using `fma` from libc).
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #129079 (Create `_imp__` symbols also when doing ThinLTO)
- #131208 (ABI: Pass aggregates by value on AIX)
- #131394 (fix(rustdoc): add space between struct fields and their descriptions)
- #131519 (Use Default visibility for rustc-generated C symbol declarations)
- #131541 (compiletest: Extract auxiliary-crate properties to their own module/struct)
- #131542 (next-solver: remove outdated FIXMEs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
compiletest: Extract auxiliary-crate properties to their own module/struct
This moves the values of the 4 different `aux-*` directives into their own sub-struct. That struct, along with its directive-parsing code, can then be shared by both `TestProps` and `EarlyProps`.
The final patch also fixes an oversight in up-to-date checking, by including *all* auxiliary crates in the timestamp, not just ordinary `aux-build` ones.
Use Default visibility for rustc-generated C symbol declarations
Non-default visibilities should only be used for definitions, not declarations, otherwise linking can fail.
This is based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123994.
Issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123427
When I changed `default-hidden-visibility` to `default-visibility` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130005, I updated all places in the code that used `default-hidden-visibility`, replicating the hidden-visibility bug to also happen for protected visibility.
Without this change, trying to build rustc with `-Z default-visibility=protected` fails with a link error.
ABI: Pass aggregates by value on AIX
On AIX we pass aggregates byval. Adds new ABI for AIX for powerpc64.
313ad85dfa/clang/lib/CodeGen/Targets/PPC.cpp (L216)
Fixes the following 2 testcases on AIX:
```
tests/ui/abi/extern/extern-pass-TwoU16s.rs
tests/ui/abi/extern/extern-pass-TwoU8s.rs
```
Create `_imp__` symbols also when doing ThinLTO
When generating a rlib crate on Windows we create `dllimport` / `_imp__` symbols for each global. This effectively makes the rlib contain an import library for itself and allows them to both be dynamically and statically linked. However when doing ThinLTO we do not generate these and thus we end up with missing symbols. Microsoft's `link` can fix these up (and emits warnings), but `lld` seems to currently be unable to.
This PR also does this generation for ThinLTO avoiding those issues with `lld` and also avoids the warnings on `link`.
This is an workaround for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81408.
cc `@lqd`
Retire the `unnamed_fields` feature for now
`#![feature(unnamed_fields)]` was implemented in part in #115131 and #115367, however work on that feature has (afaict) stalled and in the mean time there have been some concerns raised (e.g.[^1][^2]) about whether `unnamed_fields` is worthwhile to have in the language, especially in its current desugaring. Because it represents a compiler implementation burden including a new kind of anonymous ADT and additional complication to field selection, and is quite prone to bugs today, I'm choosing to remove the feature.
However, since I'm not one to really write a bunch of words, I'm specifically *not* going to de-RFC this feature. This PR essentially *rolls back* the state of this feature to "RFC accepted but not yet implemented"; however if anyone wants to formally unapprove the RFC from the t-lang side, then please be my guest. I'm just not totally willing to summarize the various language-facing reasons for why this feature is or is not worthwhile, since I'm coming from the compiler side mostly.
Fixes#117942Fixes#121161Fixes#121263Fixes#121299Fixes#121722Fixes#121799Fixes#126969Fixes#131041
Tracking:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49804
[^1]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Unnamed.20struct.2Funion.20fields
[^2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49804#issuecomment-1972619108
Consider outermost const-anon in `non_local_def` lint
This PR change the logic for finding the parent of the `impl` definition in the `non_local_definitions` lint to consider multiple level of const-anon items, instead of only one currently.
I also took the opportunity to cleanup the related code.
cc ``@traviscross``
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131474
coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps
When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed.
(The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps, and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)
Extracted from #131398, since I'm still considering whether to make those changes as-is, whereas this PR is useful and good on its own.
When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this
makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed.
(The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as
the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but
it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps,
and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)
compiletest: Simplify the choice of `--emit` mode for assembly tests
Tiny little cleanup that I noticed while working on #131524. No functional change.
Historically, the original code structure (#58791) predates the `Emit` enum (#103298), so it was manually adding `--emit` flags to the compiler invocation. But now the match can just evaluate to the appropriate `Emit` value directly.
compiletest: Remove the magic hacks for finding output with `lto=thin`
This hack was intended to handle the case where `-Clto=thin` causes the compiler to emit multiple output files (when producing LLVM-IR or assembly).
The hack only affects 4 tests, of which 3 are just meta-tests for the hack itself. The one remaining test that motivated the hack currently doesn't even need it!
(`tests/codegen/issues/issue-81408-dllimport-thinlto-windows.rs`)
This hack was intended to handle the case where `-Clto=thin` causes the
compiler to emit multiple output files (when producing LLVM-IR or assembly).
The hack only affects 4 tests, of which 3 are just meta-tests for the hack
itself. The one remaining test that motivated the hack currently doesn't even
need it!
(`tests/codegen/issues/issue-81408-dllimport-thinlto-windows.rs`)
stabilize `ci_rustc_if_unchanged_logic` test
Makes `ci_rustc_if_unchanged_logic` test more stable and re-enables it. Previously, it was expecting CI-rustc to be used all the time when there were no changes, which wasn’t always the case. Purpose of this test is making sure we don't use CI-rustc while there are changes in compiler and/or library, but we don't really need to cover cases where CI-rustc is not enabled.
Second commit was pushed for making a change in the compiler tree, so `ci_rustc_if_unchanged_logic` can be tested properly in merge CI.
Non-default visibilities should only be used for definitions, not
declarations, otherwise linking can fail.
Co-authored-by: Collin Baker <collinbaker@chromium.org>
Avoid redundant sysroot additions to `PATH` when linking
Currently, `rustc` prepends `$HOME/.rustup/toolchains/stable-aarch64-apple-darwin/lib/rustlib/aarch64-apple-darwin/bin` to the `PATH` three times before invoking the linker, which is unnecessary, once should be enough.
Spotted this while trying to get `-Clinker-flavor=gcc` and `-Clinker-flavor=ld` closer together, not really important.
`````@rustbot````` A-linkage
Compiler & its UI tests: Rename remaining occurrences of "object safe" to "dyn compatible"
Follow-up to #130826.
Part of #130852.
1. 1st commit: Fix stupid oversights. Should've been part of #130826.
2. 2nd commit: Rename the unstable feature `object_safe_for_dispatch` to `dyn_compatible_for_dispatch`. Might not be worth the churn, you decide.
3. 3rd commit: Apply the renaming to all UI tests (contents and paths).
add test infra to explicitely test rustc with autodiff/enzyme disabled
I assume this is not what you want for now, but I'll update the PR once I understand how the ignore- directives work.
To summarize the situation, we want a feature gate test where we don't enable the autodiff feature using `#![feature(autodiff)]`. There are two situations.
1) We have a rustc which was build without autodiff support (current default): It gives one error about the feature being needed and one error about this rustc version being build without autodiff support.
2) We have a rustc which was build with autodiff support (i.e. for now a custom build): It gives one error about the feature being needed.
We have a `//`````@needs-enzyme`````` directive which we can use in revisions for the second case.
However, we have no way to specify that needs-enzyme implies that the second error should not be seen.
This ads a way of passing the following test:
```
//@ revisions: has_support no_support
//`````@[has_support]````` needs-enzyme
//`````@[no_support]````` needs-enzyme-disabled
#![crate_type = "lib"]
#[autodiff(dfoo, Reverse)]
//[has_support]~^ ERROR use of unstable library feature 'autodiff' [E0658]
//[no_support]~^^ ERROR use of unstable library feature 'autodiff' [E0658]
//[no_support]~| ERROR this rustc version does not support autodiff
fn foo() {}
```
Cherry picking this PR to my frontend pr makes the test above pass in both configurations (enzyme=true/false in config.toml).
I'm open to other changes that make this testcase pass.
r? `````@jieyouxu`````
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124509
Match std `RUSTFLAGS` for host and target for `mir-opt` test suite to fix double std build/rebuilds
Previously the bootstrap compiletest `Step::run` flow had:
```rs
// ensure that `libproc_macro` is available on the host.
builder.ensure(compile::Std::new(compiler, compiler.host));
// ...
if suite == "mir-opt" {
builder.ensure(compile::Std::new_for_mir_opt_tests(compiler, target));
} else {
builder.ensure(compile::Std::new(compiler, target));
}
```
This can cause unnecessary std rebuilds (even on the same invocation) because if host == target then `builder.ensure(compile::Std::new_for_mir_opt_tests(compiler, target))` will have different `RUSTFLAGS` than `builder.ensure(compile::Std::new(compiler, compiler.host))`.
This PR fixes that by matching up std `RUSTFLAGS` if the test suite is `mir-opt`:
```rs
if suite == "mir-opt" {
builder.ensure(compile::Std::new_for_mir_opt_tests(compiler, compiler.host));
} else {
builder.ensure(compile::Std::new(compiler, compiler.host));
}
```
This is a short-term fix, the better fix is to enforce how `RUSTFLAGS` are handled as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131437#issuecomment-2401710727.
Fixes#131437.
Precise capturing in traits
This PR begins to implement `feature(precise_capturing_in_traits)`, which enables using the `impl Trait + use<..>` syntax for RPITITs. It implements this by giving the desugared GATs variance, and representing the uncaptured lifetimes as bivariant, like how opaque captures work.
Right now, I've left out implementing a necessary extension to the `refining_impl_trait` lint, and also I've made it so that all RPITITs always capture the parameters that come from the trait, because I'm not totally yet convinced that it's sound to not capture these args. It's certainly required to capture the type and const parameters from the trait (e.g. Self), or else users could bivariantly relate two RPITIT args that come from different impls, but region parameters don't affect trait selection in the same way, so it *may* be possible to relax this in the future. Let's stay conservative for now, though.
I'm not totally sure what tests could be added on top of the ones I already added, since we really don't need to exercise the `precise_capturing` feature but simply what makes it special for RPITITs.
r? types
Tracking issue:
* #130044
