Simplify `Postorder` customization.
`Postorder` has a `C: Customization<'tcx>` parameter, that gives it flexibility about how it computes successors. But in practice, there are only two `impls` of `Customization`, and one is for the unit type.
This commit simplifies things by removing the generic parameter and replacing it with an `Option`.
r? ````@saethlin````
The comments didn't make much sense to me. I asked Matthew Jasper on
Zulip about it and they said:
> I think that at the time I wanted to replace all (or most of) this
> with a reference to the HIR Id of the variable. I'll give this a look
> to see if it's still a reasonable idea, but removing the comments is
> fine.
and then:
> I don't think that changing this to an HirId would be better,
> recovering the information from the HIR seems like too much effort in
> exchange for making the MIR a little smaller.
`Postorder` has a `C: Customization<'tcx>` parameter, that gives it
flexibility about how it computes successors. But in practice, there are
only two `impls` of `Customization`, and one is for the unit type.
This commit simplifies things by removing the generic parameter and
replacing it with an `Option`.
Make fewer crates depend on `rustc_ast_ir`
I think it simplifies the crate graph and also exposes people less to confusion if downstream crates don't interact with `rustc_ast_ir` directly and instead just use its functionality reexported through more familiar paths.
r? oli-obk since you introduced ast-ir
The only visible change is to the filenames produce by `-Zdump-mir`.
E.g. before and after:
```
h.main.003-000.analysis-post-cleanup.after.mir
h.main.2-2-000.analysis-post-cleanup.after.mir
```
It also fixes a FIXME comment.
rustfmt doesn't touch it because it's a macro body, but it's large
enough that the misformatting is annoying. This commit improves it. The
most common problems fixed:
- Unnecessary multi-line patterns reduced to one line.
- Multi-line function headers adjusted so the parameter indentation
doesn't depend on the length of the function name. (This is Rust code,
not C.)
- `|` used at the start of lines, not the end.
- More consistent formatting of empty function bodies.
- Overly long lines are broken.
The `MirVisitable` trait is just a complicated way to visit either a
statement or a terminator. (And its impl for `Terminator` is unused.) It
has a single use.
This commit removes it, replacing it with an if/else, which is shorter
and simpler.
`visit_local` is the only method that doesn't call a corresponding
`super_local` method. This is valid, because `super_local` would be
empty. But it's inconsistent with every other case; we have multiple
other empty `super` methods: `super_span`, `super_ty`, etc.
This commit adds an empty `super_local` and makes `visit_local` call it.
Emit dropck normalization errors in borrowck
Borrowck generally assumes that any queries it runs for type checking will succeed, thinking that HIR typeck will have errored first if there was a problem. However as of #98641, dropck isn't run on HIR, so there's no direct guarantee that it doesn't error. While a type being well-formed might be expected to ensure that its fields are well-formed, this is not the case for types containing a type projection:
```rust
pub trait AuthUser {
type Id;
}
pub trait AuthnBackend {
type User: AuthUser;
}
pub struct AuthSession<Backend: AuthnBackend> {
data: Option<<<Backend as AuthnBackend>::User as AuthUser>::Id>,
}
pub trait Authz: Sized {
type AuthnBackend: AuthnBackend<User = Self>;
}
pub fn run_query<User: Authz>(auth: AuthSession<User::AuthnBackend>) {}
// ^ No User: AuthUser bound is required or inferred.
```
While improvements to trait solving might fix this in the future, for now we go for a pragmatic solution of emitting an error from borrowck (by rerunning dropck outside of a query) and making drop elaboration check if an error has been emitted previously before panicking for a failed normalization.
Closes#103899Closes#135039
r? `@compiler-errors` (feel free to re-assign)
Remove `rustc_middle::mir::tcx` module.
This is a really weird module. For example, what does `tcx` in `rustc_middle::mir::tcx::PlaceTy` mean? The answer is "not much".
The top-level module comment says:
> Methods for the various MIR types. These are intended for use after
> building is complete.
Awfully broad for a module that has a handful of impl blocks for some MIR types, none of which really relates to `TyCtxt`. `git blame` indicates the comment is ancient, from 2015, and made sense then.
This module is now vestigial. This commit removes it and moves all the code within into `rustc_middle::mir::statement`. Some specifics:
- `Place`, `PlaceRef`, `Rvalue`, `Operand`, `BorrowKind`: they all have `impl` blocks in both the `tcx` and `statement` modules. The commit merges the former into the latter.
- `BinOp`, `UnOp`: they only have `impl` blocks in `tcx`. The commit moves these into `statement`.
- `PlaceTy`, `RvalueInitializationState`: they are defined in `tcx`. This commit moves them into `statement` *and* makes them available in `mir::*`, like many other MIR types.
r? `@tmandry`
This is a really weird module. For example, what does `tcx` in
`rustc_middle::mir::tcx::PlaceTy` mean? The answer is "not much".
The top-level module comment says:
> Methods for the various MIR types. These are intended for use after
> building is complete.
Awfully broad for a module that has a handful of impl blocks for some
MIR types, none of which really relates to `TyCtxt`. `git blame`
indicates the comment is ancient, from 2015, and made sense then.
This module is now vestigial. This commit removes it and moves all the
code within into `rustc_middle::mir::statement`. Some specifics:
- `Place`, `PlaceRef`, `Rvalue`, `Operand`, `BorrowKind`: they all have `impl`
blocks in both the `tcx` and `statement` modules. The commit merges
the former into the latter.
- `BinOp`, `UnOp`: they only have `impl` blocks in `tcx`. The commit
moves these into `statement`.
- `PlaceTy`, `RvalueInitializationState`: they are defined in `tcx`.
This commit moves them into `statement` *and* makes them available in
`mir::*`, like many other MIR types.
Move methods from `Map` to `TyCtxt`, part 2.
Continuing the work started in #136466.
Every method gains a `hir_` prefix, though for the ones that already have a `par_` or `try_par_` prefix I added the `hir_` after that.
r? Zalathar
Continuing the work started in #136466.
Every method gains a `hir_` prefix, though for the ones that already
have a `par_` or `try_par_` prefix I added the `hir_` after that.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #137095 (Replace some u64 hashes with Hash64)
- #137100 (HIR analysis: Remove unnecessary abstraction over list of clauses)
- #137105 (Restrict DerefPure for Cow<T> impl to T = impl Clone, [impl Clone], str.)
- #137120 (Enable `relative-path-include-bytes-132203` rustdoc-ui test on Windows)
- #137125 (Re-add missing empty lines in the releases notes)
- #137145 (use add-core-stubs / minicore for a few more tests)
- #137149 (Remove SSE ABI from i586-pc-windows-msvc)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
HIR analysis: Remove unnecessary abstraction over list of clauses
`rustc_hir_analysis::bounds::Bounds` with its methods is nowadays a paper-thin wrapper around `Vec<(Clause, Span)>`s and `Vec::push` essentially.
Its existence slightly annoyed me (and I keep opening its corresp. file instead of the identically named `bounds.rs` in `hir_ty_lowering/` that I actually want most of the time :P).
Opening to check if you agree with inlining it.
r? compiler-errors or reassign
Replace some u64 hashes with Hash64
I introduced the Hash64 and Hash128 types in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110083, essentially as a mechanism to prevent hashes from landing in our leb128 encoding paths. If you just have a u64 or u128 field in a struct then derive Encodable/Decodable, that number gets leb128 encoding. So if you need to store a hash or some other value which behaves very close to a hash, don't store it as a u64.
This reverts part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117603, which turned an encoded Hash64 into a u64.
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110083, I don't expect this to be perf-sensitive on its own, though I expect that it may help stabilize some of the small rmeta size fluctuations we currently see in perf reports.
Overhaul `rustc_middle::limits`
In particular, to make `pattern_complexity` work more like other limits, which then enables some other simplifications.
r? ``@Nadrieril``
Start removing `rustc_middle::hir::map::Map`
`rustc_middle::hir::map::Map` is now just a low-value wrapper around `TyCtxt`. This PR starts removing it.
r? `@cjgillot`
First of all, note that `Map` has three different relevant meanings.
- The `intravisit::Map` trait.
- The `map::Map` struct.
- The `NestedFilter::Map` associated type.
The `intravisit::Map` trait is impl'd twice.
- For `!`, where the methods are all unreachable.
- For `map::Map`, which gets HIR stuff from the `TyCtxt`.
As part of getting rid of `map::Map`, this commit changes `impl
intravisit::Map for map::Map` to `impl intravisit::Map for TyCtxt`. It's
fairly straightforward except various things are renamed, because the
existing names would no longer have made sense.
- `trait intravisit::Map` becomes `trait intravisit::HirTyCtxt`, so named
because it gets some HIR stuff from a `TyCtxt`.
- `NestedFilter::Map` assoc type becomes `NestedFilter::MaybeTyCtxt`,
because it's always `!` or `TyCtxt`.
- `Visitor::nested_visit_map` becomes `Visitor::maybe_tcx`.
I deliberately made the new trait and associated type names different to
avoid the old `type Map: Map` situation, which I found confusing. We now
have `type MaybeTyCtxt: HirTyCtxt`.
The end goal is to eliminate `Map` altogether.
I added a `hir_` prefix to all of them, that seemed simplest. The
exceptions are `module_items` which became `hir_module_free_items` because
there was already a `hir_module_items`, and `items` which became
`hir_free_items` for consistency with `hir_module_free_items`.
It's always good to make `rustc_middle` smaller. `rustc_interface` is
the best destination, because it's the only crate that calls
`get_recursive_limit`.
It's similar to the other limits, e.g. obtained via `get_limit`. So it
makes sense to handle it consistently with the other limits. We now use
`Limit`/`usize` in most places instead of `Option<usize>`, so we use
`Limit::new(usize::MAX)`/`usize::MAX` to emulate how `None` used to work.
The commit also adds `Limit::unlimited`.
Because it's only used in `rustc_mir_transform`. (Presumably it is
currently in `rustc_middle` because lots of other MIR-related stuff is,
but that's not a hard requirement.) And because `rustc_middle` is huge
and it's always good to make it smaller.
valtree performance tuning
Summary: This PR makes type checking of code with many type-level constants faster.
After https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136180 was merged, we observed a small perf regression (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136318#issuecomment-2635562821). This happened because that PR introduced additional copies in the fast reject code path for consts, which is very hot for certain crates: 6c1d960d88/compiler/rustc_type_ir/src/fast_reject.rs (L486-L487)
This PR improves the performance again by properly interning the valtrees so that copying and comparing them becomes faster. This will become especially useful with `feature(adt_const_params)`, so the fast reject code doesn't have to do a deep compare of the valtrees.
Note that we can't just compare the interned consts themselves in the fast reject, because sometimes `'static` lifetimes in the type are be replaced with inference variables (due to canonicalization) on one side but not the other.
A less invasive alternative that I considered is simply avoiding copies introduced by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136180 and comparing the valtrees it in-place (see commit: 9e91e50ac5 / perf results: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136593#issuecomment-2642303245), however that was still measurably slower than interning.
There are some minor regressions in secondary benchmarks: These happen due to changes in memory allocations and seem acceptable to me. The crates that make heavy use of valtrees show no significant changes in memory usage.
Rename rustc_middle::Ty::is_unsafe_ptr to is_raw_ptr
The wording unsafe pointer is less common and not mentioned in a lot of places, instead this is usually called a "raw pointer". For the sake of uniformity, we rename this method.
This came up during the review of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134424.
r? `@Noratrieb`
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135549 (Document some safety constraints and use more safe wrappers)
- #135965 (In "specify type" suggestion, skip type params that are already known)
- #136193 (Implement pattern type ffi checks)
- #136646 (Add a TyPat in the AST to reuse the generic arg lowering logic)
- #136874 (Change the issue number for `likely_unlikely` and `cold_path`)
- #136884 (Lower fn items as ZST valtrees and delay a bug)
- #136885 (i686-linux-android: increase CPU baseline to Pentium 4 (without an actual change)
- #136891 (Check sig for errors before checking for unconstrained anonymous lifetime)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Lower fn items as ZST valtrees and delay a bug
Lower it as a ZST instead of a const error, which we can handle mostly fine. Delay a bug so we don't accidentally support it tho.
r? BoxyUwU
Fixes#136855Fixes#136853Fixes#136854Fixes#136337
Only added one test bc that's really the crux of the issue (fn item in array length position).
Properly deeply normalize in the next solver
Turn deep normalization into a `TypeOp`. In the old solver, just dispatch to the `Normalize` type op, but in the new solver call `deeply_normalize`. I chose to separate it into a different type op b/c some normalization is a no-op in the new solver, so this distinguishes just the normalization we need for correctness.
Then use `DeeplyNormalize` in the callsites we used to be using a `CustomTypeOp` (for normalizing known type outlives obligations), and also use it to normalize function args and impl headers in the new solver.
Finally, use it to normalize signatures for WF checks in the new solver as well. This addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/146.
Simplify intra-crate qualifiers.
The following is a weird pattern for a file within `rustc_middle`:
```
use rustc_middle::aaa;
use crate::bbb;
```
More sensible and standard would be this:
```
use crate::{aaa, bbb};
```
I.e. we generally prefer using `crate::` to using a crate's own name. (Exceptions are things like in macros where `crate::` doesn't work because the macro is used in multiple crates.)
This commit fixes a bunch of these weird qualifiers.
r? `@jieyouxu`
compiler: die immediately instead of handling unknown target codegen
We cannot produce anything useful if asked to compile unknown targets. We should handle the error immediately at the point of discovery instead of propagating it upward, and preferably in the simplest way: Die.
This allows cleaning up our "error-handling" spread across 5 crates.
The following is a weird pattern for a file within `rustc_middle`:
```
use rustc_middle::aaa;
use crate::bbb;
```
More sensible and standard would be this:
```
use crate::{aaa, bbb};
```
I.e. we generally prefer using `crate::` to using a crate's own name.
(Exceptions are things like in macros where `crate::` doesn't work
because the macro is used in multiple crates.)
This commit fixes a bunch of these weird qualifiers.
We cannot produce anything useful if asked to compile unknown targets.
We should handle the error immediately at the point of discovery instead
of propagating it upward, and preferably in the simplest way: Die.
This allows cleaning up our "error-handling" spread across 5 crates.
rustc_middle: parallel: TyCtxt: remove "unsafe impl DynSend/DynSync"
rustc_middle: parallel: TyCtxt: remove "unsafe impl DynSend/DynSync"
We don't need to "short circuit trait resolution", because DynSend and DynSync are auto traits and thus coinductive
cc "Parallel Rustc Front-end" https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113349
r? SparrowLii
``@rustbot`` label: +WG-compiler-parallel
(rustbot sometimes ignores me and doesn't attach labels on my behalf. rustbot banned me?)
The wording unsafe pointer is less common and not mentioned in a lot of
places, instead this is usually called a "raw pointer". For the sake of
uniformity, we rename this method.
This came up during the review of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134424.
Removed dependency on the field-offset crate, alternate approach
This is an alternate approach to reach the same goals as #136003. As it touches the core of the query system, this too probably should be evaluated for performance.
r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
coverage: Defer part of counter-creation until codegen
Follow-up to #135481 and #135873.
One of the pleasant properties of the new counter-assignment algorithm is that we can stop partway through the process, store the intermediate state in MIR, and then resume the rest of the algorithm during codegen. This lets it take into account which parts of the control-flow graph were eliminated by MIR opts, resulting in fewer physical counters and simpler counter expressions.
Those improvements end up completely obsoleting much larger chunks of code that were previously responsible for cleaning up the coverage metadata after MIR opts, while also doing a more thorough cleanup job.
(That change also unlocks some further simplifications that I've kept out of this PR to limit its scope.)
Visit all debug info in MIR Visitor
I've been experimenting with simplifying debug info in MIR inliner, and discovered that MIR Visitor doesn't reliably visit all spans. This PR adds the missing visitor calls.
Update bootstrap compiler and rustfmt
The rustfmt version we previously used formats things differently from what the latest nightly rustfmt does. This causes issues for subtrees that get formatted both in-tree and in their own repo. Updating the rustfmt used in-tree solves those issues. Also bumped the bootstrap compiler as the stage0 update command always updates both at the same
time.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136640 (Debuginfo for function ZSTs should have alignment of 8 bits, not 1 bit)
- #136648 (Add a missing `//@ needs-symlink` to `tests/run-make/libs-through-symlinks`)
- #136651 (Label mismatched parameters at the def site for foreign functions)
- #136691 (Remove Linkage::Private and Linkage::Appending)
- #136692 (add module level doc for bootstrap:utils:exec)
- #136700 (i686-unknown-hurd-gnu: bump baseline CPU to Pentium 4)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135179 (Make sure to use `Receiver` trait when extracting object method candidate)
- #136554 (Add `opt_alias_variances` and use it in outlives code)
- #136556 ([AIX] Update tests/ui/wait-forked-but-failed-child.rs to accomodate exiting and idle processes.)
- #136589 (Enable "jump to def" feature on rustc docs)
- #136615 (sys: net: Add UEFI stubs)
- #136635 (Remove outdated `base_port` calculation in std net test)
- #136682 (Move two windows process tests to tests/ui)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add `opt_alias_variances` and use it in outlives code
...so to fix some subtle outlives bugs with precise capturing in traits, and eventually make it easier to compute variances for "forced unconstrained" trait lifetimes.
r? lcnr
Pattern Migration 2024: try to suggest eliding redundant binding modifiers
This is based on #136475. Only the last commit is new.
This is a simpler, more restrictive alternative to #136496, meant to partially address #136047. If a pattern can be migrated to Rust 2024 solely by removing redundant binding modifiers, this will make that suggestion; otherwise, it uses the old suggestion of making the pattern fully explicit.
Relevant tracking issue: #131414
``@rustbot`` label A-diagnostics A-patterns A-edition-2024
r? ``@Nadrieril``
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136073 (Always compute coroutine layout for eagerly emitting recursive layout errors)
- #136235 (Pretty print pattern type values with transmute if they don't satisfy their pattern)
- #136311 (Ensure that we never try to monomorphize the upcasting or vtable calls of impossible dyn types)
- #136315 (Use short ty string for binop and unop errors)
- #136393 (Fix accidentally not emitting overflowing literals lints anymore in patterns)
- #136435 (Simplify some code for lowering THIR patterns)
- #136630 (Change two std process tests to not output to std{out,err}, and fix test suite stat reset in bootstrap CI test rendering)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
try-job: aarch64-gnu-debug
Simplify some code for lowering THIR patterns
I've been playing around with some radically different ways of storing THIR patterns, and while those experiments haven't yet produced a clear win, I have noticed various smaller things in the existing code that can be made a bit nicer.
Some of the more significant changes:
- With a little bit of extra effort (and thoughtful use of Arc), we can completely remove an entire layer of `'pat` lifetimes from the intermediate data structures used for match lowering.
- In several places, lists of THIR patterns were being double-boxed for no apparent reason.
Pretty print pattern type values with transmute if they don't satisfy their pattern
Instead of printing `0_u32 is 1..`, we now print the default fallback rendering that we also use for invalid bools, chars, ...: `{transmute(0x00000000): (u32) is 1..=}`.
These cases can occur in mir dumps when const prop propagates a constant across a safety check that would prevent the actually UB value from existing. That's fine though, as it's dead code and we always need to allow UB in dead code.
follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136176
cc ``@compiler-errors`` ``@scottmcm``
r? ``@RalfJung`` because of the interpreter changes
Always compute coroutine layout for eagerly emitting recursive layout errors
Detect recursive coroutine layouts even if we don't detect opaque type recursion in the new solver. This is for two reasons:
1. It helps us detect (bad) recursive async function calls in the new solver, which due to its approach to normalization causes us to not detect this via a recursive RPIT (since the opaques are more eagerly revealed in the opaque body).
* Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/137.
2. It helps us detect (bad) recursive async functions behind AFITs. See the AFIT test that changed for the old solver too.
3. It also greatly simplifies the recursive impl trait check, since I can remove some jankness around how it handles coroutines.
tree-wide: parallel: Fully removed all `Lrc`, replaced with `Arc`
tree-wide: parallel: Fully removed all `Lrc`, replaced with `Arc`
This is continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132282 .
I'm pretty sure I did everything right. In particular, I searched all occurrences of `Lrc` in submodules and made sure that they don't need replacement.
There are other possibilities, through.
We can define `enum Lrc<T> { Rc(Rc<T>), Arc(Arc<T>) }`. Or we can make `Lrc` a union and on every clone we can read from special thread-local variable. Or we can add a generic parameter to `Lrc` and, yes, this parameter will be everywhere across all codebase.
So, if you think we should take some alternative approach, then don't merge this PR. But if it is decided to stick with `Arc`, then, please, merge.
cc "Parallel Rustc Front-end" ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113349 )
r? SparrowLii
`@rustbot` label WG-compiler-parallel
We have four macros for generating trivial traversal (fold/visit) and
lift impls.
- `rustc_ir::TrivialTypeTraversalImpls`
- `rustc_middle::TrivialTypeTraversalImpls`
- `rustc_middle::TrivialLiftImpls`
- `rustc_middle::TrivialTypeTraversalAndLiftImpls`
The first two are very similar. The last one just combines the second
and third one.
The macros themselves are ok, but their use is a mess. This commit does
the following.
- Removes types that no longer need a lift and/or traversal impl from
the macro calls.
- Consolidates the macro calls into the smallest number of calls
possible, with each one mentioning as many types as possible.
- Orders the types within those macro calls alphabetically, and makes
the module qualification more consistent.
- Eliminates `rustc_middle::mir::type_foldable`, because the macro calls
were merged and the manual `TypeFoldable` impls are better placed in
`structural_impls.rs`, alongside all the other ones.
This makes the code more concise. Moving forward, it also makes it more
obvious where new types should be added.
#[contracts::requires(...)] + #[contracts::ensures(...)]
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128044
Updated contract support: attribute syntax for preconditions and postconditions, implemented via a series of desugarings that culminates in:
1. a compile-time flag (`-Z contract-checks`) that, similar to `-Z ub-checks`, attempts to ensure that the decision of enabling/disabling contract checks is delayed until the end user program is compiled,
2. invocations of lang-items that handle invoking the precondition, building a checker for the post-condition, and invoking that post-condition checker at the return sites for the function, and
3. intrinsics for the actual evaluation of pre- and post-condition predicates that third-party verification tools can intercept and reinterpret for their own purposes (e.g. creating shims of behavior that abstract away the function body and replace it solely with the pre- and post-conditions).
Known issues:
* My original intent, as described in the MCP (https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/759) was to have a rustc-prefixed attribute namespace (like rustc_contracts::requires). But I could not get things working when I tried to do rewriting via a rustc-prefixed builtin attribute-macro. So for now it is called `contracts::requires`.
* Our attribute macro machinery does not provide direct support for attribute arguments that are parsed like rust expressions. I spent some time trying to add that (e.g. something that would parse the attribute arguments as an AST while treating the remainder of the items as a token-tree), but its too big a lift for me to undertake. So instead I hacked in something approximating that goal, by semi-trivially desugaring the token-tree attribute contents into internal AST constucts. This may be too fragile for the long-term.
* (In particular, it *definitely* breaks when you try to add a contract to a function like this: `fn foo1(x: i32) -> S<{ 23 }> { ... }`, because its token-tree based search for where to inject the internal AST constructs cannot immediately see that the `{ 23 }` is within a generics list. I think we can live for this for the short-term, i.e. land the work, and continue working on it while in parallel adding a new attribute variant that takes a token-tree attribute alongside an AST annotation, which would completely resolve the issue here.)
* the *intent* of `-Z contract-checks` is that it behaves like `-Z ub-checks`, in that we do not prematurely commit to including or excluding the contract evaluation in upstream crates (most notably, `core` and `std`). But the current test suite does not actually *check* that this is the case. Ideally the test suite would be extended with a multi-crate test that explores the matrix of enabling/disabling contracts on both the upstream lib and final ("leaf") bin crates.
Shard AllocMap Lock
This improves performance on many-seed parallel (-Zthreads=32) miri executions from managing to use ~8 cores to using 27-28 cores, which is about the same as what I see with the data structure proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136105 - I haven't analyzed but I suspect the sharding might actually work out better if we commonly insert "densely" since sharding would split the cache lines and the OnceVec packs locks close together. Of course, we could do something similar with the bitset lock too.
Either way, this seems like a very reasonable starting point that solves the problem ~equally well on what I can test locally.
r? `@RalfJung`
Allow using named consts in pattern types
This required a refactoring first: I had to stop using `hir::Pat`in `hir::TyKind::Pat` and instead create a separate `TyPat` that has `ConstArg` for range ends instead of `PatExpr`. Within the type system we should be using `ConstArg` for all constants, as otherwise we'd be maintaining two separate const systems that could diverge. The big advantage of this PR is that we now inherit all the rules from const generics and don't have a separate system. While this makes things harder for users (const generic rules wrt what is allowed in those consts), it also means we don't accidentally allow some things like referring to assoc consts or doing math on generic consts.
`rustc_middle` and `rustc_query_system` both have a file called
`dep_node.rs` with a big comment at the top, and the comments are very
similar. The one in `rustc_query_system` looks like the original, and
the one in `rustc_middle` is a copy with some improvements.
This commit removes the comment from `rustc_middle` and updates the one
in `rustc_query_system` to include the improvements. I did it this way
because `rustc_query_system` is the crate that defines `DepNode`, and so
seems like the right place for the comment.
Notes on types/traits used for in-memory query caching
When the word "cache" appears in the context of the query system, it often isn't obvious whether that is referring to the in-memory query cache or the on-disk incremental cache.
For these types, we can assure the reader that they are for in-memory caching.
Use the type-level constant value `ty::Value` where needed
**Follow-up to #136180**
### Summary
This PR refactors functions to accept a single type-level constant value `ty::Value` instead of separate `ty::ValTree` and `ty::Ty` parameters:
- `valtree_to_const_value`: now takes `ty::Value`
- `pretty_print_const_valtree`: now takes `ty::Value`
- Uses `pretty_print_const_valtree` for formatting valtrees when `visit_const_operand`
- Moves `try_to_raw_bytes` from `ty::Valtree` to `ty::Value`
---
r? ``@lukas-code`` ``@oli-obk``
When the word "cache" appears in the context of the query system, it often
isn't obvious whether that is referring to the in-memory query cache or the
on-disk incremental cache.
For these types, we can assure the reader that they are for in-memory caching.
