Stop using `HirId` for fn-like parents since closures are not `OwnerNode`s
This is a minimal fix for #123273.
I'm overall pretty disappointed w/ the state of this code; although it's "just diagnostics", it still should be maintainable and understandable and neither of those are true. I believe this code really needs some major overhauling before anything more should be added to it, because there are subtle invariants that are being exercised and subsequently broken all over the place, and I don't think we should just paper over them (e.g.) by delaying bugs or things like that. I wouldn't be surprised if fixing up this code would also yield better diagnostics.
Make the computation of `coroutine_captures_by_ref_ty` more sophisticated
Currently, we treat all the by-(mut/)ref borrows of a coroutine-closure as having a "closure env" borrowed lifetime.
When we have the given code:
```rust
let x: &'a i32 = ...;
let c = async || {
let _x = *x;
};
```
Then when we call:
```rust
c()
// which, because `AsyncFn` takes a `&self`, we insert an autoref:
(&c /* &'env {coroutine-closure} */)()
```
We will return a future whose captures contain `&'env i32` instead of `&'a i32`, which is way more restrictive than necessary. We should be able to drop `c` while the future is alive since it's not actually borrowing any data *originating from within* the closure's captures, but since the capture has that `'env` lifetime, this is not possible.
This wouldn't be true, for example, if the closure captured `i32` instead of `&'a i32`, because the `'env` lifetime is actually *necessary* since the data (`i32`) is owned by the closure.
This PR identifies two criteria where we *need* to take the borrow with the closure env lifetime:
1. If the closure borrows data from inside the closure's captures. This is not true if the parent capture is by-ref, OR if the parent capture is by-move and the child capture begins with a deref projection. This is the example described above.
2. If we're dealing with mutable references, since we cannot reborrow `&'env mut &'a mut i32` into `&'a mut i32`, *only* `&'env mut i32`.
See the documentation on `should_reborrow_from_env_of_parent_coroutine_closure` for more info.
**important:** As disclaimer states on that function, luckily, if this heuristic is not correct, then the program is not unsound, since we still borrowck and validate the choices made from this function -- the only side-effect is that the user may receive unnecessary borrowck errors.
Fixes#123241
Don't rely on upvars being assigned just because coroutine-closure kind is assigned
Previously, code relied on the implicit assumption that if a coroutine-closure's kind variable was constrained, then its upvars were also constrained. This is because we assign all of them at once at the end up upvar analysis.
However, there's another way that a coroutine-closure's kind can be constrained: from a signature hint in closure signature deduction. After #123350, we use these hints, which means the implicit assumption above no longer holds.
This PR adds the necessary checks so that we don't ICE.
r? oli-obk
Better reporting on generic argument mismatchs
This allows better reporting as per issue #116615 .
If you have a function:
```
fn foo(a: T, b: T) {}
```
and call it like so:
```
foo(1, 2.)
```
it'll give improved error reported similar to the following:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> generic-mismatch-reporting-issue-116615.rs:6:12
|
6 | foo(1, 2.);
| --- - ^^ expected integer, found floating-point number
| | |
| | expected argument `b` to be an integer because that argument needs to match the type of this parameter
| arguments to this function are incorrect
|
note: function defined here
--> generic-mismatch-reporting-issue-116615.rs:1:4
|
1 | fn foo<T>(a: T, b: T) {}
| ^^^ - ---- ----
| | | |
| | | this parameter needs to match the integer type of `a`
| | `b` needs to match the type of this parameter
| `a` and `b` all reference this parameter T
```
Open question, do we need to worry about error message translation into other languages? Not sure what the status of that is in Rust.
NB: Needs some checking over and some tests have altered that need sanity checking, but overall this is starting to get somewhere now. Will take out of draft PR status when this has been done, raising now to allow feedback at this stage, probably 90% ready.
Fix capture analysis for by-move closure bodies
The check we were doing to figure out if a coroutine was borrowing from its parent coroutine-closure was flat-out wrong -- a misunderstanding of mine of the way that `tcx.closure_captures` represents its captures.
Fixes#123251 (the miri/ui test I added should more than cover that issue)
r? `@oli-obk` -- I recognize that this PR may be underdocumented, so please ask me what I should explain further.
This makes `-Zprint-type-sizes`'s output easier to read, because the
name of an `async fn` is more immediately recognizable than its span.
I also deleted the comment "FIXME(eddyb) should use `def_span`." because
it appears to have already been fixed by commit 67727aa7c3.
This should assist comprehending the size of coroutines.
In particular, whenever a future is suspended while awaiting another
future, the latter is given the special name `__awaitee`, and now the
type of the awaited future will be printed, allowing identifying
caller/callee — er, I mean, poller/pollee — relationships.
It would be possible to include the type name in more cases, but I
thought that that might be overly verbose (`print-type-sizes` is already
a lot of text) and ordinary named fields or variables are easier for
readers to discover the types of.
Don't ICE when encountering bound regions in generator interior type
I'm pretty sure this meant to say "`has_free_regions`", probably just a typo in 4a4fc3bb5b. We can have bound regions (because we only convert non-bound regions into existential regions in generator interiors), but we can't have (non-ReErased) free regions.
r? lcnr
Split an item bounds and an item's super predicates
This is the moral equivalent of #107614, but instead for predicates this applies to **item bounds**. This PR splits out the item bounds (i.e. *all* predicates that are assumed to hold for the alias) from the item *super predicates*, which are the subset of item bounds which share the same self type as the alias.
## Why?
Much like #107614, there are places in the compiler where we *only* care about super-predicates, and considering predicates that possibly don't have anything to do with the alias is problematic. This includes things like closure signature inference (which is at its core searching for `Self: Fn(..)` style bounds), but also lints like `#[must_use]`, error reporting for aliases, computing type outlives predicates.
Even in cases where considering all of the `item_bounds` doesn't lead to bugs, unnecessarily considering irrelevant bounds does lead to a regression (#121121) due to doing extra work in the solver.
## Example 1 - Trait Aliases
This is best explored via an example:
```
type TAIT<T> = impl TraitAlias<T>;
trait TraitAlias<T> = A + B where T: C;
```
The item bounds list for `Tait<T>` will include:
* `Tait<T>: A`
* `Tait<T>: B`
* `T: C`
While `item_super_predicates` query will include just the first two predicates.
Side-note: You may wonder why `T: C` is included in the item bounds for `TAIT`? This is because when we elaborate `TraitAlias<T>`, we will also elaborate all the predicates on the trait.
## Example 2 - Associated Type Bounds
```
type TAIT<T> = impl Iterator<Item: A>;
```
The `item_bounds` list for `TAIT<T>` will include:
* `Tait<T>: Iterator`
* `<Tait<T> as Iterator>::Item: A`
But the `item_super_predicates` will just include the first bound, since that's the only bound that is relevant to the *alias* itself.
## So what
This leads to some diagnostics duplication just like #107614, but none of it will be user-facing. We only see it in the UI test suite because we explicitly disable diagnostic deduplication.
Regarding naming, I went with `super_predicates` kind of arbitrarily; this can easily be changed, but I'd consider better names as long as we don't block this PR in perpetuity.
For async closures, cap closure kind, get rid of `by_mut_body`
Right now we have three `AsyncFn*` traits, and three corresponding futures that are returned by the `call_*` functions for them. This is fine, but it is a bit excessive, since the future returned by `AsyncFn` and `AsyncFnMut` are identical. Really, the only distinction we need to make with these bodies is "by ref" and "by move".
This PR removes `AsyncFn::CallFuture` and renames `AsyncFnMut::CallMutFuture` to `AsyncFnMut::CallRefFuture`. This simplifies MIR building for async closures, since we don't need to build an extra "by mut" body, but just a "by move" body which is materially different.
We need to do a bit of delicate handling of the ClosureKind for async closures, since we need to "cap" it to `AsyncFnMut` in some cases when we only care about what body we're looking for.
This also fixes a bug where `<{async closure} as Fn>::call` was returning a body that takes the async-closure receiver *by move*.
This also helps align the `AsyncFn` traits to the `LendingFn` traits' eventual designs.
Split refining_impl_trait lint into _reachable, _internal variants
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119535#issuecomment-1909352040:
> We discussed this today in triage and developed a consensus to:
>
> * Add a separate lint against impls that refine a return type defined with RPITIT even when the trait is not crate public.
> * Place that in a lint group along with the analogous crate public lint.
> * Create an issue to solicit feedback on these lints (or perhaps two separate ones).
> * Have the warnings displayed with each lint reference this issue in a similar manner to how we do that today with the required `Self: '0'` bound on GATs.
> * Make a note to review this feedback on 2-3 release cycles.
This points users to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121718 to leave feedback.
- Firstly get all the information about generics matching out of the HIR
- Secondly the labelling for the function is more coherent now
- Lastly a few error message improvements
Test wasm32-wasip1 in CI, not wasm32-unknown-unknown
This commit changes CI to no longer test the `wasm32-unknown-unknown` target and instead test the `wasm32-wasip1` target. There was some discussion of this in a [Zulip thread], and the motivations for this PR are:
* Runtime failures on `wasm32-unknown-unknown` print nothing, meaning all you get is "something failed". In contrast `wasm32-wasip1` can print to stdout/stderr.
* The unknown-unknown target is missing lots of pieces of libstd, and while `wasm32-wasip1` is also missing some pieces (e.g. threads) it's missing fewer pieces. This means that many more tests can be run.
Overall my hope is to improve the debuggability of wasm failures on CI and ideally be a bit less of a maintenance burden.
This commit specifically removes the testing of `wasm32-unknown-unknown` and replaces it with testing of `wasm32-wasip1`. Along the way there were a number of other archiectural changes made as well, including:
* A new `target.*.runtool` option can now be specified in `config.toml` which is passed as `--runtool` to `compiletest`. This is used to reimplement execution of WebAssembly in a less-wasm-specific fashion.
* The default value for `runtool` is an ambiently located WebAssembly runtime found on the system, if any. I've implemented logic for Wasmtime.
* Existing testing support for `wasm32-unknown-unknown` and Emscripten has been removed. I'm not aware of Emscripten testing being run any time recently and otherwise `wasm32-wasip1` is in theory the focus now.
* I've added a new `//@ needs-threads` directive for `compiletest` and classified a bunch of wasm-ignored tests as needing threads. In theory these tests can run on `wasm32-wasi-preview1-threads`, for example.
* I've tried to audit all existing tests that are either `ignore-emscripten` or `ignore-wasm*`. Many now run on `wasm32-wasip1` due to being able to emit error messages, for example. Many are updated with comments as to why they can't run as well.
* The `compiletest` output matching for `wasm32-wasip1` automatically uses "match a subset" mode implemented in `compiletest`. This is because WebAssembly runtimes often add extra information on failure, such as the `unreachable` instruction in `panic!`, which isn't able to be matched against the golden output from native platforms.
* I've ported most existing `run-make` tests that use custom Node.js wrapper scripts to the new run-make-based-in-Rust infrastructure. To do this I added `wasmparser` as a dependency of `run-make-support` for the various wasm tests to use that parse wasm files. The one test that executed WebAssembly now uses `wasmtime`-the-CLI to execute the test instead. I have not ported over an exception-handling test as Wasmtime doesn't implement this yet.
* I've updated the `test` crate to print out timing information for WASI targets as it can do that (gets a previously ignored test now passing).
* The `test-various` image now builds a WASI sysroot for the WASI target and additionally downloads a fixed release of Wasmtime, currently the latest one at 18.0.2, and uses that for testing.
[Zulip thread]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Have.20wasm.20tests.20ever.20caused.20problems.20on.20CI.3F/near/424317944
* The WASI targets deal with the `main` symbol a bit differently than
native so some `codegen` and `assembly` tests have been ignored.
* All `ignore-emscripten` directives have been updated to
`ignore-wasm32` to be more clear that all wasm targets are ignored and
it's not just Emscripten.
* Most `ignore-wasm32-bare` directives are now gone.
* Some ignore directives for wasm were switched to `needs-unwind`
instead.
* Many `ignore-wasm32*` directives are removed as the tests work with
WASI as opposed to `wasm32-unknown-unknown`.
Implement async closure signature deduction
Self-explanatory from title.
Regarding the interaction between signature deduction, fulfillment, and the new trait solver: I'm not worried about implementing closure signature deduction here because:
1. async closures are unstable, and
2. I'm reasonably confident we'll need to support signature deduction in the new solver somehow (i.e. via proof trees, which seem very promising).
This is in contrast to #109338, which was closed because it generalizes signature deduction for a *stable* kind of expression (`async {}` blocks and `Future` traits), and which proliferated usage may pose a stabilization hazard for the new solver.
I'll be certain to make sure sure we revisit the closure signature deduction problem by the time that async closures are being stabilized (which isn't particularly soon) (edit: Put it into the async closure tracking issue). cc `````@lcnr`````
r? `````@oli-obk`````
Use root obligation on E0277 for some cases
When encountering trait bound errors that satisfy some heuristics that tell us that the relevant trait for the user comes from the root obligation and not the current obligation, we use the root predicate for the main message.
This allows to talk about "X doesn't implement Pattern<'_>" over the most specific case that just happened to fail, like "char doesn't implement Fn(&mut char)" in
`tests/ui/traits/suggest-dereferences/root-obligation.rs`
The heuristics are:
- the type of the leaf predicate is (roughly) the same as the type from the root predicate, as a proxy for "we care about the root"
- the leaf trait and the root trait are different, so as to avoid talking about `&mut T: Trait` and instead remain talking about `T: Trait` instead
- the root trait is not `Unsize`, as to avoid talking about it in `tests/ui/coercion/coerce-issue-49593-box-never.rs`.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&char: Pattern<'_>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/root-obligation.rs:6:38
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(c))
| -------- ^ the trait `Fn<(char,)>` is not implemented for `&char`, which is required by `&char: Pattern<'_>`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: required for `&char` to implement `FnOnce<(char,)>`
= note: required for `&char` to implement `Pattern<'_>`
note: required by a bound in `core::str::<impl str>::contains`
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/str/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: consider dereferencing here
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(*c))
| +
```
Fix#79359, fix#119983, fix#118779, cc #118415 (the suggestion needs to change), cc #121398 (doesn't fix the underlying issue).
Adjust error `yield`/`await` lowering
Adjust the lowering of `yield`/`await` outside of their correct scopes so that we no longer make orpan HIR exprs.
Previously, `yield EXPR` would be lowered directly to `hir::TyKind::Error` (which I'll call `<error>`) which means that `EXPR` was not present in the HIR, but now we lower it to `{ EXPR; <error> }` so that `EXPR` is not orphaned.
Fixes#121096
When encountering trait bound errors that satisfy some heuristics that
tell us that the relevant trait for the user comes from the root
obligation and not the current obligation, we use the root predicate for
the main message.
This allows to talk about "X doesn't implement Pattern<'_>" over the
most specific case that just happened to fail, like "char doesn't
implement Fn(&mut char)" in
`tests/ui/traits/suggest-dereferences/root-obligation.rs`
The heuristics are:
- the type of the leaf predicate is (roughly) the same as the type
from the root predicate, as a proxy for "we care about the root"
- the leaf trait and the root trait are different, so as to avoid
talking about `&mut T: Trait` and instead remain talking about
`T: Trait` instead
- the root trait is not `Unsize`, as to avoid talking about it in
`tests/ui/coercion/coerce-issue-49593-box-never.rs`.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&char: Pattern<'_>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/root-obligation.rs:6:38
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(c))
| -------- ^ the trait `Fn<(char,)>` is not implemented for `&char`, which is required by `&char: Pattern<'_>`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: required for `&char` to implement `FnOnce<(char,)>`
= note: required for `&char` to implement `Pattern<'_>`
note: required by a bound in `core::str::<impl str>::contains`
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/str/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: consider dereferencing here
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(*c))
| +
```
Fix#79359, fix#119983, fix#118779, cc #118415 (the suggestion needs
to change).
