Use structured suggestion when telling user about `for<'a>`
```
error[E0637]: `&` without an explicit lifetime name cannot be used here
--> $DIR/E0637.rs:13:13
|
LL | T: Into<&u32>,
| ^ explicit lifetime name needed here
|
help: consider introducing a higher-ranked lifetime here
|
LL | T: for<'a> Into<&'a u32>,
| +++++++ ++
```
Encode item bounds for `DefKind::ImplTraitPlaceholder`
This was lost in a refactoring -- `hir::ItemKind::OpaqueTy` doesn't always map to `DefKind::Opaque`, specifically for RPITITs, so the check was migrated subtly wrong, and unfortunately I never had a test for this 🙃Fixes#113155
r? ``@cjgillot``
Account for late-bound vars from parent arg-position impl trait
We should be reporting an error like we do for late-bound args coming from a parent APIT.
Fixes#113016
suggest `slice::swap` for `mem::swap(&mut x[0], &mut x[1])` borrowck error
Recently saw someone ask why this code (example slightly modified):
```rs
fn main() {
let mut foo = [1, 2];
std::mem::swap(&mut foo[0], &mut foo[1]);
}
```
triggers this error and how to fix it:
```
error[E0499]: cannot borrow `foo[_]` as mutable more than once at a time
--> src/main.rs:4:33
|
4 | std::mem::swap(&mut foo[0], &mut foo[1]);
| -------------- ----------- ^^^^^^^^^^^ second mutable borrow occurs here
| | |
| | first mutable borrow occurs here
| first borrow later used by call
|
= help: consider using `.split_at_mut(position)` or similar method to obtain two mutable non-overlapping sub-slices
```
The current help message is nice and goes in the right direction, but I think we can do better for this specific instance and suggest `slice::swap`, which makes this compile
```
error[E0637]: `&` without an explicit lifetime name cannot be used here
--> $DIR/E0637.rs:13:13
|
LL | T: Into<&u32>,
| ^ explicit lifetime name needed here
|
help: consider introducing a higher-ranked lifetime here
|
LL | T: for<'a> Into<&'a u32>,
| +++++++ ++
```
Normalize opaques with late-bound vars again
We have a hack in the compiler where if an opaque has escaping late-bound vars, we skip revealing it even though we *could* reveal it from a technical perspective. First of all, this is weird, since we really should be revealing all opaques in `Reveal::All` mode. Second of all, it causes subtle bugs (linked below).
I attempted to fix this in #100980, which was unfortunately reverted due to perf regressions on codebases that used really deeply nested futures in some interesting ways. The worst of which was #103423, which caused the project to hang on build. Another one was #104842, which was just a slow-down, but not a hang. I took some time afterwards to investigate how to rework `normalize_erasing_regions` to take advantage of better caching, but that effort kinda fizzled out (#104133).
However, recently, I was made aware of more bugs whose root cause is not revealing opaques during codegen. That made me want to fix this again -- in the process, interestingly, I took the the minimized example from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103423#issuecomment-1292947043, and it doesn't seem to hang any more...
Thinking about this harder, there have been some changes to the way we lower and typecheck async futures that may have reduced the pathologically large number of outlives obligations (see description of #103423) that we were encountering when normalizing opaques with bound vars the last time around:
* #104321 (lower `async { .. }` directly as a generator that implements `Future`, removing the `from_generator` shim)
* #104833 (removing an `identity_future` fn that was wrapping desugared future generators)
... so given that I can see:
* No significant regression on rust perf bot (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1600070317)
* No timeouts in crater run I did (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1605428952, rechecked failing crates in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1605973434)
... and given that this PR:
* Fixes#104601
* Fixes#107557
* Fixes#109464
* Allows us to remove a `DefiningAnchor::Bubble` from codegen (75a8f68183)
I'm inclined to give this another shot at landing this. Best case, it just works -- worst case, we get more examples to study how we need to improve the compiler to make this work.
r? types
`early_warn` is called
Skip `colored-session-opt-error.rs` on Windows hosts
This is very cursed as to why it fails on Windows CI specifically:
- The test emits a *warning*.
- *Warnings*, and only warnings *specifically*, have a different
256-color between Windows and non-Windows hosts (other levels
`set_intense(true)` unconditionally):
e69c7306e2/compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs (L1792-L1794)
Therefore, I added `// ignore-windows` test header to skip this test on
Windows (it's sufficient to test color is enabled on at least one
non-Windows host).
Setting `RUSTC_LOG_COLOR=always` is sometimes useful if tools that one
pipes `RUSTC_LOG` into support coloured output, but it makes this test
fail.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #112946 (Improve cgu naming and ordering)
- #113048 (Fix build on Solaris where fd-lock cannot be used.)
- #113100 (Fix display of long items in search results)
- #113107 (add check for ConstKind::Value(_) to in_operand())
- #113119 (rustdoc: Reduce internal function visibility.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Test that we require implementing trait items whose bounds don't hold in the current impl
I initially tried to make most of these pass, but that's a big can of worms, so I'm just adding them as tests, considering we have no tests for these things.
Make associated type bounds in supertrait position implied
`trait A: B<Assoc: C> {}` should be able to imply both `Self: B` and `<Self as B>::Assoc: C`. Adjust the way that we collect implied predicates to do so.
Fixes#112573Fixes#112568
add check for ConstKind::Value(_) to in_operand()
Added check for valtree value to close#113012 which fixes the issue, although I am not sure if adding the check there is sound or not cc `@oli-obk`
add note for non-exhaustive matches with guards
Associated issue: #92197
When a match statement includes guards on every match arm (and is therefore necessarily non-exhaustive), add a note to the error E0004 diagnostic noting this.
Validate fluent variable references in tests
Closes#101109
Under `cfg(test)`, the `fluent_messages` macro will emit a list of variables referenced by each message and its attributes. The derive attribute will now emit a `#[test]` that checks that each referenced variable exists in the structure it's applied to.
mir opt + codegen: handle subtyping
fixes#107205
the same issue was caused in multiple places:
- mir opts: both copy and destination propagation
- codegen: assigning operands to locals (which also propagates values)
I changed codegen to always update the type in the operands used for locals which should guard against any new occurrences of this bug going forward. I don't know how to make mir optimizations more resilient here. Hopefully the added tests will be enough to detect any trivially wrong optimizations going forward.
Add tests impl via obj unless denied
Fixes#112737
Add simple tests to check feature change in #112320 is performing as expected.
Note:
- Unsure about filenames, locations & function signature names (tried to make them something sensible)
Make compiletest aware of targets without dynamic linking
Some parts of the compiletest internals and some tests require dynamic linking to work, which is not supported by all targets. Before this PR, this was handled by if branches matching on the target name.
This PR loads whether a target supports dynamic linking or not from the target spec, and adds a `// needs-dynamic-linking` attribute for tests that require it. Note that I was not able to replace all the old conditions based on the target name, as some targets have `dynamic_linking: true` in their spec but pretend they don't have it in compiletest.
Also, to get this to work I had to *partially* revert #111472 (cc `@djkoloski` `@tmandry` `@bjorn3).` On one hand, only the target spec contains whether a target supports dynamic linking, but on the other hand a subset of the fields can be overridden through `-C` flags (as far as I'm aware only `-C panic=$strategy`). The solution I came up with is to take the target spec as the base, and then override the panic strategy based on `--print=cfg`. Hopefully that should not break y'all again.
`hir`: Add `Become` expression kind (explicit tail calls experiment)
This adds `hir::ExprKind::Become` alongside ast lowering. During hir-thir lowering we currently lower `become` as `return`, so that we can partially test `become` without ICEing.
cc `@scottmcm`
r? `@Nilstrieb`
Revert "Structurally resolve correctly in check_pat_lit"
This reverts commit 54fb5a48b9. Also adds a couple of tests, and downgrades the existing `-Ztrait-solver=next` test to a known-bug.
Fixes#112993
Fix test for #96258#98644 did not properly test enabling the problematic lint as a warning due to improper use of `compile-flags:` (missing `:`). This makes it use `#![warn]` instead, like in the reproducer.
cc #96258
[-Ztrait-solver=next, mir-typeck] instantiate hidden types in the root universe
Fixes an ICE in the test `member-constraints-in-root-universe`.
Main motivation is to make #112691 pass under the new solver.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Fix return type notation associated type suggestion when -Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty
This avoid suggesting the associated types generated for RPITITs when the one the code refers to doesn't exist and rustc looks for a suggestion.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Fix return type notation errors with -Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty
This just adjust the way we check for RPITITs and uses the new helper method to do the "old" and "new" check at once.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Don't emit same goal as input during `wf::unnormalized_obligations`
r? `@aliemjay` cc `@lcnr`
I accidentally pruned the logic to handle `WF(?0)` when writing `wf::unnormalized_obligations`.
idk if you wanted to construct a test first, but this is an obvious fix. Copied the comment from above.
Fixesrust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#36
Implement `Sync` for `mpsc::Sender`
`mpsc::Sender` is currently `!Sync` because the previous implementation contained an optimization where the channel started out as single-producer and was dynamically upgraded on the first clone, which relied on a unique reference to the sender. This optimization is one of the main reasons the old implementation was so complex and was removed in #93563. `mpsc::Sender` can now soundly implement `Sync`.
Note for any potential confusion, this chance does *not* add MPMC behavior. This only affects the already `Send + Clone` *sender*, not *receiver*.
It's technically possible to rely on the `!Sync` behavior in the same way as a `PhantomData<*mut T>`, but that seems very unlikely in practice. Either way, this change is insta-stable and needs an FCP.
`@rustbot` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
Various impl trait in assoc tys cleanups
r? `@compiler-errors`
All commits except for the last are pure refactorings. 274dab5bd658c97886a8987340bf50ae57900c39 allows struct fields to participate in deciding whether a function has an opaque in its signature.
best reviewed commit by commit
Stop hiding const eval limit in external macros
fixes#112748
We don't emit a hard error if there was a previous deny lint triggering with the same message. If that lint ends up not being emitted, we ICE and don't emit an error either.
Don't ICE on unnormalized struct tail in layout computation
1. We try to compute a `SizeSkeleton` even if a layout error occurs, but we really only need to do this if we get `LayoutError::Unknown`, since that means our type is too polymorphic to actually compute the full layout. If we have other errors, like `LayoutError::NormalizationError` or `LayoutError::Cycle`, then we can't really make any progress, since this represents an actual error.
2. Avoid using `normalize_erasing_regions` and `struct_tail_erasing_lifetimes` since those ICE on normalization errors, and since we may call `layout_of` in HIR typeck, we don't know for certain that we're on the happy path.
Fixes#112736
Always register sized obligation for argument
Removes a "hack" that skips registering sized obligations for parameters that are simple identifiers. This doesn't seem to affect diagnostics because we're probably already being smart enough about deduplicating identical error messages anyways.
Fixes#112608
Avoid guessing unknown trait implementation in suggestions
When a trait is used without specifying the implementation (e.g. calling a non-member associated function without fully-qualified syntax) and there are multiple implementations available, use a placeholder comment for the implementation type in the suggestion instead of picking a random implementation.
Example:
```
fn main() {
let _ = Default::default();
}
```
Previous output:
```
error[E0790]: cannot call associated function on trait without specifying the corresponding `impl` type
--> test.rs:2:13
|
2 | let _ = Default::default();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot call associated function of trait
|
help: use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation (273 found)
|
2 | let _ = <FileTimes as Default>::default();
| +++++++++++++ +
```
New output:
```
error[E0790]: cannot call associated function on trait without specifying the corresponding `impl` type
--> test.rs:2:13
|
2 | let _ = Default::default();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot call associated function of trait
|
help: use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation (273 found)
|
2 | let _ = </* self type */ as Default>::default();
| +++++++++++++++++++ +
```
Fixes#112897
When a trait is used without specifying the implementation (e.g. calling
a non-member associated function without fully-qualified syntax) and
there are multiple implementations available, use a placeholder comment
for the implementation type in the suggestion instead of picking a
random implementation.
Example:
```
fn main() {
let _ = Default::default();
}
```
Previous output:
```
error[E0790]: cannot call associated function on trait without specifying the corresponding `impl` type
--> test.rs:2:13
|
2 | let _ = Default::default();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot call associated function of trait
|
help: use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation (273 found)
|
2 | let _ = <FileTimes as Default>::default();
| +++++++++++++ +
```
New output:
```
error[E0790]: cannot call associated function on trait without specifying the corresponding `impl` type
--> test.rs:2:13
|
2 | let _ = Default::default();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot call associated function of trait
|
help: use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation (273 found)
|
2 | let _ = </* self type */ as Default>::default();
| +++++++++++++++++++ +
```
Account for sealed traits in privacy and trait bound errors
On trait bound errors caused by super-traits, identify if the super-trait is publicly accessibly and if not, explain "sealed traits".
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `S: Hidden` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/sealed-trait-local.rs:17:20
|
LL | impl a::Sealed for S {}
| ^ the trait `Hidden` is not implemented for `S`
|
note: required by a bound in `Sealed`
--> $DIR/sealed-trait-local.rs:3:23
|
LL | pub trait Sealed: self:🅱️:Hidden {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Sealed`
= note: `Sealed` is a "sealed trait", because to implement it you also need to implelement `a:🅱️:Hidden`, which is not accessible; this is usually done to force you to use one of the provided types that already implement it
```
Deduplicate privacy errors that point to the same path segment even if their deduplication span are different.
When encountering a path that is not reachable due to privacy constraints path segments other than the last, keep metadata for the last path segment's `Res` in order to look for alternative import paths for that item to suggest. If there are none, be explicit that the item is not accessible.
```
error[E0603]: module `b` is private
--> $DIR/re-exported-trait.rs:11:9
|
LL | impl a:🅱️:Trait for S {}
| ^ private module
|
note: the module `b` is defined here
--> $DIR/re-exported-trait.rs:5:5
|
LL | mod b {
| ^^^^^
help: consider importing this trait through its public re-export instead
|
LL | impl a::Trait for S {}
| ~~~~~~~~
```
```
error[E0603]: module `b` is private
--> $DIR/private-trait.rs:8:9
|
LL | impl a:🅱️:Hidden for S {}
| ^ ------ trait `b` is not publicly reachable
| |
| private module
|
note: the module `b` is defined here
--> $DIR/private-trait.rs:2:5
|
LL | mod b {
| ^^^^^
```
Suggest publicly accessible paths for items in private mod:
When encountering a path in non-import situations that are not reachable
due to privacy constraints, search for any public re-exports that the
user could use instead.
Track whether an import suggestion is offering a re-export.
When encountering a path with private segments, mention if the item at
the final path segment is not publicly accessible at all.
Add item visibility metadata to privacy errors from imports:
On unreachable imports, record the item that was being imported in order
to suggest publicly available re-exports or to be explicit that the item
is not available publicly from any path.
In order to allow this, we add a mode to `resolve_path` that will not
add new privacy errors, nor return early if it encounters one. This way
we can get the `Res` corresponding to the final item in the import,
which is used in the privacy error machinery.
When implementing a public trait with a private super-trait, we now emit
a note that the missing bound is not going to be able to be satisfied,
and we explain the concept of a sealed trait.
Print def_id on EarlyBoundRegion debug
It's not the first time that I can't make sense out of the default debug print on `EarlyBoundRegion`. As I was working on #112682 I needed this.
I was doing some git archeology and found that we used to print everything dfbc9608ce/src/librustc/util/ppaux.rs (L425-L430) but we lost the ability in some refactor midway.
Don't substitute a GAT that has mismatched generics in `OpaqueTypeCollector`
Fixes#111828
I didn't put up minimized UI tests for #112510 or #112873 because they'd minimize to literally the same code, but with different substs on the trait/impl. I don't think that warrants duplicate tests given the nature of the fix.
r? `@oli-obk`
----
Side-note: I checked, and this isn't fixed by #112652 -- I think we discussed whether or not that PR fixed it either intentionally or by accident. The code here isn't really touched by that PR either as far as I can tell?
Also, sorry, did some other drive-bys. Hope it doesn't make rebasing #112652 too difficult 😅
Warn on unused `offset_of!()` result
The usage of `core::hint::must_use()` means that we don't get a specialized message. I figured out that since there are plenty of other methods that just have `#[must_use]` with no message it'll be fine, but it is a bit unfortunate that the error mentions `must_use` and not `offset_of!`.
Fixes#111669.
Syntactically accept `become` expressions (explicit tail calls experiment)
This adds `ast::ExprKind::Become`, implements parsing and properly gates the feature.
cc `@scottmcm`
The only regression is one ambiguity in the new trait solver, having to
do with two param-env candidates that may apply. I think this is fine,
since the error message already kinda sucks.
Revert #112758 and add test case
Fixes#112831.
Cannot unwrap `update_resolution` for `resolution.single_imports.remove(&Interned::new_unchecked(import));` because there is a relationship between the `Import` and `&NameBinding` in `NameResolution`. This issue caused by my unfamiliarity with the data structure and I apologize for it.
This PR had been reverted, and test case have been added.
r? `@Nilstrieb`
cc `@petrochenkov`
Sort the errors from arguments checking so that suggestions are handled properly
Fixes#112507
The algorithm of `find_issue` does not make sure the index comes out in order, which will make suggesting `remove` or `add` arguments broken in some cases.
Modifying the algorithm to obey order involves much more trivial change, so it's better to order the `errors` after iterations.
Add `implement_via_object` to `rustc_deny_explicit_impl` to control object candidate assembly
Some built-in traits are special, since they are used to prove facts about the program that are important for later phases of compilation such as codegen and CTFE. For example, the `Unsize` trait is used to assert to the compiler that we are able to unsize a type into another type. It doesn't have any methods because it doesn't actually *instruct* the compiler how to do this unsizing, but this is later used (alongside an exhaustive match of combinations of unsizeable types) during codegen to generate unsize coercion code.
Due to this, these built-in traits are incompatible with the type erasure provided by object types. For example, the existence of `dyn Unsize<T>` does not mean that the compiler is able to unsize `Box<dyn Unsize<T>>` into `Box<T>`, since `Unsize` is a *witness* to the fact that a type can be unsized, and it doesn't actually encode that unsizing operation in its vtable as mentioned above.
The old trait solver gets around this fact by having complex control flow that never considers object bounds for certain built-in traits:
2f896da247/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/candidate_assembly.rs (L61-L132)
However, candidate assembly in the new solver is much more lovely, and I'd hate to add this list of opt-out cases into the new solver. Instead of maintaining this complex and hard-coded control flow, instead we can make this a property of the trait via a built-in attribute. We already have such a build attribute that's applied to every single trait that we care about: `rustc_deny_explicit_impl`. This PR adds `implement_via_object` as a meta-item to that attribute that allows us to opt a trait out of object-bound candidate assembly as well.
r? `@lcnr`
Don't consider TAIT normalizable to hidden ty if it would result in impossible item bounds
See test for example where we shouldn't consider it possible to alias-relate a TAIT and hidden type.
r? `@lcnr`
Don't ICE on bound var in `reject_fn_ptr_impls`
We may try to use an impl like `impl<T: FnPtr> PartialEq {}` to satisfy a predicate like `for<T> T: PartialEq` -- don't ICE in that case.
Fixes#112735
Treat TAIT equation as always ambiguous in coherence
Not sure why we weren't treating all TAIT equality as ambiguous -- this behavior combined with `DefineOpaqueTypes::No` leads to coherence overlap failures, since we incorrectly consider impls as not overlapping because the obligation `T: From<Foo>` doesn't hold.
Fixes#112765
Continue folding in query normalizer on weak aliases
Fixes#112752Fixes#112731 (same root cause, so didn't make a test for it)
fixes#112776
r? ```@oli-obk```
Rewrite various resolve/diagnostics errors as translatable diagnostics
additional question:
For trivial strings is it ever accepted to use `fluent_generated::foo` in a `label` for example? Or is an empty struct `Diagnostic` preferred?
`#[test]` function signature verification improvements
This PR contains two improvements to the expansion of the `#[test]` macro.
The first one fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112360 by correctly recovering item statements if the signature verification fails.
The second one forbids non-lifetime generics on `#[test]` functions. These were previously allowed if the function returned `()`, but always caused an inference error:
before:
```text
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
--> src/lib.rs:2:1
|
1 | #[test]
| ------- in this procedural macro expansion
2 | fn foo<T>() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot infer type
```
after:
```text
error: functions used as tests can not have any non-lifetime generic parameters
--> src/lib.rs:2:1
|
2 | fn foo<T>() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Also includes some basic tests for test function signature verification, because I couldn't find any (???) in the test suite.
