Reproduce the bug from <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123282>
that indicates this feature gate hits edition-dependent resolution paths.
Resolution changed in edition 2018, so test that as well.
```
error: `S2<'_>` is forbidden as the type of a const generic parameter
--> $DIR/lifetime-in-const-param.rs:5:23
|
LL | struct S<'a, const N: S2>(&'a ());
| ^^
|
= note: the only supported types are integers, `bool` and `char`
help: add `#![feature(adt_const_params)]` to the crate attributes to enable more complex and user defined types
|
LL + #![feature(adt_const_params)]
|
```
Fix#55941.
`f16` and `f128` step 3: compiler support & feature gate
Continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121841, another portion of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114607
This PR exposes the new types to the world and adds a feature gate. Marking this as a draft because I need some feedback on where I did the feature gate check. It also does not yet catch type via suffixed literals (so the feature gate test will fail, probably some others too because I haven't belssed).
If there is a better place to check all types after resolution, I can do that. If not, I figure maybe I can add a second gate location in AST when it checks numeric suffixes.
Unfortunately I still don't think there is much testing to be done for correctness (codegen tests or parsed value checks) until we have basic library support. I think that will be the next step.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116909
r? `@compiler-errors`
cc `@Nilstrieb`
`@rustbot` label +F-f16_and_f128
Add a test that `f16` and `f128` are usable with the feature gate
enabled, as well as a test that user types with the same name as
primitives are not improperly gated.
Includes related tests and documentation pages.
Michael Goulet: Don't issue feature error in resolver for f16/f128
unless finalize
Co-authored-by: Michael Goulet <michael@errs.io>
This gives one extra error message on two tests, but is necessary to fix
bigger problems caused by the cancellation of stashed errors.
(Note: why not just avoid stashing altogether? Because that resulted in
additional output changes.)
Continue compilation after check_mod_type_wf errors
The ICEs fixed here were probably reachable through const eval gymnastics before, but now they are easily reachable without that, too.
The new errors are often bugfixes, where useful errors were missing, because they were reported after the early abort. In other cases sometimes they are just duplication of already emitted errors, which won't be user-visible due to deduplication.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120860
When we have a resolution error when looking at a fully qualified path
on a type, look for all associated functions on inherent impls that
return `Self` and mention them to the user.
Fix#69512.
Suggest trait bounds for used associated type on type param
Fix#101351.
When an associated type on a type parameter is used, and the type parameter isn't constrained by the correct trait, suggest the appropriate trait bound:
```
error[E0220]: associated type `Associated` not found for `T`
--> file.rs:6:15
|
6 | field: T::Associated,
| ^^^^^^^^^^ there is a similarly named associated type `Associated` in the trait `Foo`
|
help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
|
5 | struct Generic<T: Foo> {
| +++++
```
When an associated type on a type parameter has a typo, suggest fixing
it:
```
error[E0220]: associated type `Baa` not found for `T`
--> $DIR/issue-55673.rs:9:8
|
LL | T::Baa: std::fmt::Debug,
| ^^^ there is a similarly named associated type `Bar` in the trait `Foo`
|
help: change the associated type name to use `Bar` from `Foo`
|
LL | T::Bar: std::fmt::Debug,
| ~~~
```
Fix#101351.
When an associated type on a type parameter is used, and the type
parameter isn't constrained by the correct trait, suggest the
appropriate trait bound:
```
error[E0220]: associated type `Associated` not found for `T`
--> file.rs:6:15
|
6 | field: T::Associated,
| ^^^^^^^^^^ there is a similarly named associated type `Associated` in the trait `Foo`
|
help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
|
5 | struct Generic<T: Foo> {
| +++++
```
When an associated type on a type parameter has a typo, suggest fixing
it:
```
error[E0220]: associated type `Baa` not found for `T`
--> $DIR/issue-55673.rs:9:8
|
LL | T::Baa: std::fmt::Debug,
| ^^^ there is a similarly named associated type `Bar` in the trait `Foo`
|
help: change the associated type name to use `Bar` from `Foo`
|
LL | T::Bar: std::fmt::Debug,
| ~~~
```
resolve: skip underscore character during candidate lookup
Fixes#116164
In use statement, an underscore is merely a placeholder symbol and does not bind to any name. Therefore, it can be safely ignored.
More accurate suggestion for `self.` and `Self::`
Detect that we can't suggest `self.` in an associated function without `&self` receiver.
Partially address #115992.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
This function is now used to check `#[panic_handler]`, `start` lang item, `main`, `#[start]` and intrinsic functions.
The diagnosis produced are now closer to the ones produced by trait/impl method signature mismatch.
Improve diagnostic for generic params from outer items (E0401)
Generalize the wording of E0401 to talk about *outer items* instead of *outer functions* since the current phrasing is outdated. The outer item can be a function, constant, trait, ADT or impl block (see the new UI test for the more exotic examples).
Further, don't suggest introducing generic parameters to constant items unless the feature `generic_const_items` is enabled.
Lastly, make E0401 translatable while we're at it.
Fixes#115720.
Add filter with following segment while lookup typo for path
From the discussion: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112917#discussion_r1239150173
Seems we can not get the assoc items for `Struct`, `Enum` in the resolving phase.
A obvious filter is avoid suggesting the same name with the following segment path.
Use `following_seg` can extend the function `smart_resolve_partial_mod_path_errors` for more scenarios, such as `std::sync_error::atomic::AtomicBool` in test case.
r? `@estebank`
Suggest publicly accessible paths for items in private mod:
When encountering a path in non-import situations that are not reachable
due to privacy constraints, search for any public re-exports that the
user could use instead.
Track whether an import suggestion is offering a re-export.
When encountering a path with private segments, mention if the item at
the final path segment is not publicly accessible at all.
Add item visibility metadata to privacy errors from imports:
On unreachable imports, record the item that was being imported in order
to suggest publicly available re-exports or to be explicit that the item
is not available publicly from any path.
In order to allow this, we add a mode to `resolve_path` that will not
add new privacy errors, nor return early if it encounters one. This way
we can get the `Res` corresponding to the final item in the import,
which is used in the privacy error machinery.
fix(resolve): update shadowed_glob more precision
- Fixes#109153
- Fixes#109962
## Why does it panic?
We use #109153 as an illustration.
The process of `resolve_imports` is:
| Iter | resolve | resolution of **`(Mod(root), Ident(bar) in type ns)`** |
| - | - | - |
| 0 | `use foo::*` | `binding` -> foo::bar, `shallowed_glob` -> `None` |
| 1 | `use bar::bar` | `binding` -> foo::bar::bar, `shallowed_glob` -> foo::bar |
| 2 | `use bar::*` | `binding` -> foo::bar::bar, `shallowed_glob` -> foo::bar::bar::bar |
So during `finalize_import`, the `root::bar` in `use bar::bar` had been pointed to `foo::bar::bar::bar`, which is different from the `initial_module` valued of `foo::bar`, therefore, the panic had been triggered.
## Try to solve it
~I think #109153 should check-pass rather than throw an ambiguous error. Following this idea, there are two ways to solve this problem:~
~1. Give up the `initial_module` and update `import.imported_module` after each resolution update. However, I think this method may have too much impact.~
~2. Do not update the `shadowed_glob` when it is defined.~
~To be honest, I am not sure if this is the right way to solve this ICE. Perhaps there is a better resolution.~
Edit: we had made the `resolution.shadowed_glob` update more detailed.
r? `@petrochenkov`
- Either explicitly annotate `let x: () = expr;` where `x` has unit
type, or remove the unit binding to leave only `expr;` instead.
- Fix disjoint-capture-in-same-closure test
Suppress "erroneous constant used" for constants tainted by errors
When constant evaluation fails because its MIR is tainted by errors,
suppress note indicating that erroneous constant was used, since those
errors have to be fixed regardless of the constant being used or not.
Fixes#110891.
When constant evaluation fails because its MIR is tainted by errors,
suppress note indicating that erroneous constant was used, since those
errors have to be fixed regardless of the constant being used or not.
