Remove `rustc_middle::mir::tcx` module.
This is a really weird module. For example, what does `tcx` in `rustc_middle::mir::tcx::PlaceTy` mean? The answer is "not much".
The top-level module comment says:
> Methods for the various MIR types. These are intended for use after
> building is complete.
Awfully broad for a module that has a handful of impl blocks for some MIR types, none of which really relates to `TyCtxt`. `git blame` indicates the comment is ancient, from 2015, and made sense then.
This module is now vestigial. This commit removes it and moves all the code within into `rustc_middle::mir::statement`. Some specifics:
- `Place`, `PlaceRef`, `Rvalue`, `Operand`, `BorrowKind`: they all have `impl` blocks in both the `tcx` and `statement` modules. The commit merges the former into the latter.
- `BinOp`, `UnOp`: they only have `impl` blocks in `tcx`. The commit moves these into `statement`.
- `PlaceTy`, `RvalueInitializationState`: they are defined in `tcx`. This commit moves them into `statement` *and* makes them available in `mir::*`, like many other MIR types.
r? `@tmandry`
This is a really weird module. For example, what does `tcx` in
`rustc_middle::mir::tcx::PlaceTy` mean? The answer is "not much".
The top-level module comment says:
> Methods for the various MIR types. These are intended for use after
> building is complete.
Awfully broad for a module that has a handful of impl blocks for some
MIR types, none of which really relates to `TyCtxt`. `git blame`
indicates the comment is ancient, from 2015, and made sense then.
This module is now vestigial. This commit removes it and moves all the
code within into `rustc_middle::mir::statement`. Some specifics:
- `Place`, `PlaceRef`, `Rvalue`, `Operand`, `BorrowKind`: they all have `impl`
blocks in both the `tcx` and `statement` modules. The commit merges
the former into the latter.
- `BinOp`, `UnOp`: they only have `impl` blocks in `tcx`. The commit
moves these into `statement`.
- `PlaceTy`, `RvalueInitializationState`: they are defined in `tcx`.
This commit moves them into `statement` *and* makes them available in
`mir::*`, like many other MIR types.
Move methods from `Map` to `TyCtxt`, part 2.
Continuing the work started in #136466.
Every method gains a `hir_` prefix, though for the ones that already have a `par_` or `try_par_` prefix I added the `hir_` after that.
r? Zalathar
Continuing the work started in #136466.
Every method gains a `hir_` prefix, though for the ones that already
have a `par_` or `try_par_` prefix I added the `hir_` after that.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #137095 (Replace some u64 hashes with Hash64)
- #137100 (HIR analysis: Remove unnecessary abstraction over list of clauses)
- #137105 (Restrict DerefPure for Cow<T> impl to T = impl Clone, [impl Clone], str.)
- #137120 (Enable `relative-path-include-bytes-132203` rustdoc-ui test on Windows)
- #137125 (Re-add missing empty lines in the releases notes)
- #137145 (use add-core-stubs / minicore for a few more tests)
- #137149 (Remove SSE ABI from i586-pc-windows-msvc)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
HIR analysis: Remove unnecessary abstraction over list of clauses
`rustc_hir_analysis::bounds::Bounds` with its methods is nowadays a paper-thin wrapper around `Vec<(Clause, Span)>`s and `Vec::push` essentially.
Its existence slightly annoyed me (and I keep opening its corresp. file instead of the identically named `bounds.rs` in `hir_ty_lowering/` that I actually want most of the time :P).
Opening to check if you agree with inlining it.
r? compiler-errors or reassign
Replace some u64 hashes with Hash64
I introduced the Hash64 and Hash128 types in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110083, essentially as a mechanism to prevent hashes from landing in our leb128 encoding paths. If you just have a u64 or u128 field in a struct then derive Encodable/Decodable, that number gets leb128 encoding. So if you need to store a hash or some other value which behaves very close to a hash, don't store it as a u64.
This reverts part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117603, which turned an encoded Hash64 into a u64.
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110083, I don't expect this to be perf-sensitive on its own, though I expect that it may help stabilize some of the small rmeta size fluctuations we currently see in perf reports.
Overhaul `rustc_middle::limits`
In particular, to make `pattern_complexity` work more like other limits, which then enables some other simplifications.
r? ``@Nadrieril``
Start removing `rustc_middle::hir::map::Map`
`rustc_middle::hir::map::Map` is now just a low-value wrapper around `TyCtxt`. This PR starts removing it.
r? `@cjgillot`
First of all, note that `Map` has three different relevant meanings.
- The `intravisit::Map` trait.
- The `map::Map` struct.
- The `NestedFilter::Map` associated type.
The `intravisit::Map` trait is impl'd twice.
- For `!`, where the methods are all unreachable.
- For `map::Map`, which gets HIR stuff from the `TyCtxt`.
As part of getting rid of `map::Map`, this commit changes `impl
intravisit::Map for map::Map` to `impl intravisit::Map for TyCtxt`. It's
fairly straightforward except various things are renamed, because the
existing names would no longer have made sense.
- `trait intravisit::Map` becomes `trait intravisit::HirTyCtxt`, so named
because it gets some HIR stuff from a `TyCtxt`.
- `NestedFilter::Map` assoc type becomes `NestedFilter::MaybeTyCtxt`,
because it's always `!` or `TyCtxt`.
- `Visitor::nested_visit_map` becomes `Visitor::maybe_tcx`.
I deliberately made the new trait and associated type names different to
avoid the old `type Map: Map` situation, which I found confusing. We now
have `type MaybeTyCtxt: HirTyCtxt`.
The end goal is to eliminate `Map` altogether.
I added a `hir_` prefix to all of them, that seemed simplest. The
exceptions are `module_items` which became `hir_module_free_items` because
there was already a `hir_module_items`, and `items` which became
`hir_free_items` for consistency with `hir_module_free_items`.
It's always good to make `rustc_middle` smaller. `rustc_interface` is
the best destination, because it's the only crate that calls
`get_recursive_limit`.
It's similar to the other limits, e.g. obtained via `get_limit`. So it
makes sense to handle it consistently with the other limits. We now use
`Limit`/`usize` in most places instead of `Option<usize>`, so we use
`Limit::new(usize::MAX)`/`usize::MAX` to emulate how `None` used to work.
The commit also adds `Limit::unlimited`.
Because it's only used in `rustc_mir_transform`. (Presumably it is
currently in `rustc_middle` because lots of other MIR-related stuff is,
but that's not a hard requirement.) And because `rustc_middle` is huge
and it's always good to make it smaller.
valtree performance tuning
Summary: This PR makes type checking of code with many type-level constants faster.
After https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136180 was merged, we observed a small perf regression (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136318#issuecomment-2635562821). This happened because that PR introduced additional copies in the fast reject code path for consts, which is very hot for certain crates: 6c1d960d88/compiler/rustc_type_ir/src/fast_reject.rs (L486-L487)
This PR improves the performance again by properly interning the valtrees so that copying and comparing them becomes faster. This will become especially useful with `feature(adt_const_params)`, so the fast reject code doesn't have to do a deep compare of the valtrees.
Note that we can't just compare the interned consts themselves in the fast reject, because sometimes `'static` lifetimes in the type are be replaced with inference variables (due to canonicalization) on one side but not the other.
A less invasive alternative that I considered is simply avoiding copies introduced by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136180 and comparing the valtrees it in-place (see commit: 9e91e50ac5 / perf results: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136593#issuecomment-2642303245), however that was still measurably slower than interning.
There are some minor regressions in secondary benchmarks: These happen due to changes in memory allocations and seem acceptable to me. The crates that make heavy use of valtrees show no significant changes in memory usage.
