library/std: Remove unused `gimli-symbolize` feature
library/backtrace also declares a feature called `gimli-symbolize` which appear used, but the feature in std with the same name is unused, so remove it.
library/backtrace also declares a feature called `gimli-symbolize` which
appear used, but the feature in std with the same name is unused, so
remove it.
Use `target_vendor = "apple"` instead of `target_os = "..."`
Use `target_vendor = "apple"` instead of `all(target_os = "macos", target_os = "ios", target_os = "tvos", target_os = "watchos", target_os = "visionos")`.
The apple targets are quite close to being identical, with iOS, tvOS, watchOS and visionOS being even closer, so using `target_vendor` when possible makes it clearer when something is actually OS-specific, or just Apple-specific.
Note that `target_vendor` will [be deprecated in the future](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100343), but not before an alternative (like `target_family = "apple"`) is available.
While doing this, I found various inconsistencies and small mistakes in the standard library, see the commits for details. Will follow-up with an extra PR for a similar issue that need a bit more discussion. EDIT: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124494
Since you've talked about using `target_vendor = "apple"` in the past:
r? workingjubilee
CC `@simlay,` `@thomcc`
`@rustbot` label O-macos O-ios O-tvos O-watchos O-visionos
`man posix_spawn` documents it to be able to return `ENOENT`, and there
should be nothing preventing this. Tested in the iOS simulator and on
Mac Catalyst.
Abort a process when FD ownership is violated
When an owned FD has already been closed before it's dropped that means something else touched an FD in ways it is not allowed to. At that point things can already be arbitrarily bad, e.g. clobbered mmaps. Recovery is not possible.
All we can do is hasten the fire.
Unlike the previous attempt in #124130 this shouldn't suffer from the possibility that FUSE filesystems can return arbitrary errors.
Unconditionally call `really_init` on GNU/Linux
This makes miri not diverge in behavior, it fixes running Rust linux-gnu binaries on musl with gcompat, it fixes dlopen edge-cases that cranelift somehow hits, etc.
Fixes#124126
thou hast gazed into this abyss with me:
r? ``@ChrisDenton``
This makes miri not diverge in behavior, it fixes running Rust linux-gnu
binaries on musl with gcompat, it fixes dlopen edge-cases that cranelift
somehow hits, etc.
thread_local: be excruciatingly explicit in dtor code
Use raw pointers to accomplish internal mutability, and clearly split references where applicable. This reduces the likelihood that any of these parts are misunderstood, either by humans or the compiler's optimizations.
Fixes#124317
r? ``@joboet``
PathBuf: replace transmuting by accessor functions
The existing `repr(transparent)` was anyway insufficient as `OsString` was not `repr(transparent)`. And furthermore, on Windows it was blatantly wrong as `OsString` wraps `Wtf8Buf` which is a `repr(Rust)` type with 2 fields:
51a7396ad3/library/std/src/sys_common/wtf8.rs (L131-L146)
So let's just be honest about what happens and add accessor methods that make this abstraction-breaking act of PathBuf visible on the APIs that it pierces through.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124409
windows fill_utf16_buf: explain the expected return value
The comment just says "return what the syscall returns", but that doesn't work for all syscalls as the Windows API is not consistent in how buffer size is negotiated. For instance, GetUserProfileDirectoryW works a bit differently, and so home_dir_crt has to translate this to the usual protocol itself. So it's worth describing that protocol.
r? ``@ChrisDenton``
remove an unused type from the reentrant lock tests
At least it seems unused. This was added back in 45aa6c8d1b together with a test related to poisoning; when the test got removed, it seems like it was forgotten to also remove this type.
Fix watchOS and visionOS for pread64 and pwrite64 calls
In #122880, links to `preadv64` and `pwritev64` were added for `watchOS` however the underlying [`weak!` macro did not include `target_os = "watchos"`](c45dee5efd/library/std/src/sys/pal/unix/weak.rs (L30-L74)).
This resulted in an `xcodebuild` error when targeting `watchOS`:
```
Undefined symbols for architecture arm64:
"_preadv64", referenced from:
__rust_extern_with_linkage_preadv64 in libliveview_native_core.a[274](std-324fdd8d31e8eaa2.std.e18cf7e8d0336778-cgu.08.rcgu.o)
"_pwritev64", referenced from:
__rust_extern_with_linkage_pwritev64 in libliveview_native_core.a[274](std-324fdd8d31e8eaa2.std.e18cf7e8d0336778-cgu.08.rcgu.o)
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture arm64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
```
So I added them. I also went ahead and added the same for visionOS because it's bound to create the same issue.
When an EBADF happens then something else already touched an FD in ways it is not allowed to.
At that point things can already be arbitrarily bad, e.g. clobbered mmaps.
Recovery is not possible.
All we can do is hasten the fire.
Use raw-dylib for Windows synchronization functions
Fixes#123999 by using the raw-dylib feature to specify the DLL to load the Windows futex functions from (e.g. [`WaitOnAddress`](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/synchapi/nf-synchapi-waitonaddress)). This avoids reliance on the import library causing that issue.
With apologies to ``@bjorn3,`` as it's currently necessary to revert this for cranelift.
Add support for Arm64EC to the Standard Library
Adds the final pieces so that the standard library can be built for arm64ec-pc-windows-msvc (initially added in #119199)
* Bumps `windows-sys` to 0.56.0, which adds support for Arm64EC.
* Correctly set the `isEC` parameter for LLVM's `writeArchive` function.
* Add `#![feature(asm_experimental_arch)]` to library crates where Arm64EC inline assembly is used, as it is currently unstable.
Document overrides of `clone_from()` in core/std
As mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96979#discussion_r1379502413
Specifically, when an override doesn't just forward to an inner type, document the behavior and that it's preferred over simply assigning a clone of source. Also, change instances where the second parameter is "other" to "source".
I reused some of the wording over and over for similar impls, but I'm not sure that the wording is actually *good*. Would appreciate feedback about that.
Also, now some of these seem to provide pretty specific guarantees about behavior (e.g. will reuse the exact same allocation iff the len is the same), but I was basing it off of the docs for [`Box::clone_from`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.75.0/std/boxed/struct.Box.html#method.clone_from-1) - I'm not sure if providing those strong guarantees is actually good or not.
